ug.cgi?id=17113
Thanks!
--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the release
[ ] -1 I am against this proposal (must include a reason).
--
I am +1 on the Struts 1.1-rc1 release plan.
--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e
e
"Zarro Boogs found". I've just finished getting FileUpload 1.0 Beta 1 out
the door, so I can now tackle Struts 1.1 RC1. I believe we still need to
vote, so I'll post an RC1 release plan and call it, and we can go from
there.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> -Ted.
>
>
>
>
ig
> file -- I think the STXX folks are planning to take advantage of this to
> define their processing pipelines inside an element.
This option also moves the problem, but this time it's moved to web.xml
instead of struts-config.xml. ;-)
I really don't see a way of doing what Peter wants without modifying the
code.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Craig
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
only in a JSP 1.2 environment is still way better than having
no tests! However, if others are not comfortable with this, then I think
we'd have to resort to using scriptlets in the test pages to isolate the tag
tests.
--
re final?
The former - you are correct. I found the section on Lifecycle, on page 163
of the JSP 1.2 spec, and the accompanying diagram on page 164, very helpful
when I was trying to get my head around this.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> regards,
> Mohan.
Right. Neither not have 'title' or 'titleKey'
attributes. Perhaps you have the wrong TLD in place?
--
Martin Cooper
"David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I couldn't find t
+1 for Struts as 100% Apache Code. :-)
--
Martin Cooper
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> If you're subscribed to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list,
> you'll be aware that there have been some recent policty decisions with
> the goal of tightening down
rned about case (b), and don't believe we should
go out of our way to provide a nice solution for it. I realise that some
people will want to continue to use action chaining, so we will need to
allow for it in some shape or form. However, I have a scheme that allows
me to achieve the same e
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, aswath satrasala wrote:
> Hello,
> What version of source should be used for commons-beanutils.jar
> that shipped with struts.
The corresponding sources are tagged with the label STRUTS_1_1_B3 in the
CVS repository.
--
Martin Cooper
&g
eeing that the mapping is
available regardless of the type of request being processed.
Comments?
--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I looked at this one too, and came out with similar feelings. I think this
needs the eyes of our resident Keyboard Monkey, if he's around.
Calling all Keyboard Monkeys... We need your help...
--
Martin Cooper
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, James Turner wrote:
> I've taken a look at the c
ruts-EL should stay put until we get Struts 1.1 out the door. After
that, we can discuss how to incorporate contrib code into the release as
part of a broader discussion of how to factor distributions.
--
Martin Cooper
>
>
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, James Turner wrote:
> > Dear Mr. Validator,
> >
> > Bugzilla #16272 looks like a Commons Validator bug, and
> > #16337 may be a problem with Struts/Validator integration.
> > Any progress to report?
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> >
Struts has now joined the (rather small) list of Jakarta projects which
have *zero* bad imports (i.e. unused or unnecessary) in their code base:
http://cvs.apache.org/~tcopeland/jakarta_bad_imports.htm
Cool!
--
Martin Cooper
and #16337 may be a
problem with Struts/Validator integration. Any progress to report?
;-)
--
Martin Cooper
>
> James Turner
> Owner & Manager, Black Bear Software, LLC
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Author:
> MySQL & JSP Web Applications:
> Data Driven Programming
is a guess, since I don't use this functionality. Hence this
message instead of just changing the code base. If someone who knows this
area could take a look and confirm/deny, that would be great.
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ot;ant -projecthelp" should tell you
> everything about the targets that are designed for human consumption (i.e.
> the ones that have "description" attributes).
+1
Ant is our friend.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> >
> > --
> > James Mitchell
>
> Craig
>
&g
ires a fair amount of work.
One day, I'll finish writing up the Struts release process, so that others
can step up to the plate and know what they need to do. The trick is that
I have to write it up in such a way as to encourage people to take it on,
rather than scare them away... ;-)
--
Marti
going to have much time to help kill the remaining bugs, and the tag and
build will have to happen over a weekend. So should it be next weekend,
the weekend after that, or when?
--
Martin Cooper
>
>
>http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=
t, complete with comments
around the scripts.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> The requirement that the htmlComment attribute be ignored in XHTML mode does
> not allow for the above situation.
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
> >My original intent was indeed to veto the change. Since then, I have
g will not.
>
> Is there an easy way to get the diffs or comments of all elements with commits
> since the 1.1b3 tagging?
I haven't tried it, but you should be able to use 'cvs log' or 'cvs diff'
with a dat
release candidate. Calling 1.1-b3 a release candidate
is, in my opinion, tantamount to lowering our standards, or at least
appearing to do so in the eyes of our customer base. That is not a good
precedent to set.
--
Martin Cooper
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, James Turner wrote:
> In line with Crai
n prevention of markup
processing within the script block is necessary. The default should be
'true', as it is currently. In addition, if XHTML is being generated, then
the 'htmlComment' attribute should be ignored, and script blocks never
wrapped in HTML comments.
Wi
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, David Graham wrote:
> Ok, what do you think about a boolean "cdata" attribute for the javascript
> tag? I think this will accomodate everyone's needs.
You mean add a "violate the spec to keep some browsers happy" attribute?
-1.
--
Marti
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
> I would tend to agree with Craig in that if we can't do it correctly,
> then let's not do it.
+1
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Using the Struts taglibs provided with the core distribution is not a
> technical requirement. Other tag
ta Taglibs has a DBTags tag
library. Perhaps one or both of those might be of use to you?
--
Martin Cooper
>
> I'm interesting in developping such a library if not.
>
> Please send me your reaction.
>
> reguards
>
>
> Lionel
>
>
>
>
> --
> To
ruts-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg08356.html
You sold me on Resources. ;-) See the thread for the various naming
options we discussed.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> So, then, ActionMessages would also become a wrapper around a Commons
> class and would also encapsulate the Struts globals.
>
> Of
it (and +1 the
move to Proper and the release).
--
Martin Cooper
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> As we've discussed a couple of times, the last major functionality change
> we had discussed for Struts 1.1 was to migrate to dependence on
> commons-resources, rather
Enhancement requests should be posted to the bug database, as described
here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/using.html#Bugs
That will make sure it doesn't get lost, and will be addressed at some
point.
--
Martin Cooper
On 13 Jan 2003, Jay wrote:
> Requested modification
This question is really a question for the struts-user list, and not the
struts-dev list. In any case, the answer to your question is documented at
the link Laird provided.
--
Martin Cooper
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Rajendra Yadav wrote:
>
> Can we pass objects using the struts fra
the release manager will get, and thus what the source
distribution will contain.
The only thing that needs fixing is the developer who commits changes to
the code base from a different platform than they checked out from.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> David Morris
>
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Da
t over the fence to Jakarta Commons, since
that is where BeanUtils lives now. It'll be fixed before Struts 1.1 Final
is released, and probably much sooner.
--
Martin Cooper
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, David Morris wrote:
> I added a similar comment to the bugzilla site, but
> it never s
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, David Graham wrote:
>
> > Like you said, Struts does not use the source as the documentation. The
> > majority of people looking at the source are contributors and people looking
> > to extend th
ntire code base to move them to the bottom. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
>
> David
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "James Higginbotham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Struts Devel
section entitled "Bugs To Be Addressed".
--
Martin Cooper
>
> --
> Nick
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nd
then we can talk more about the latter.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> This could be done in 2 places:
> 1) The Jakarta script that
> checks to see if a user has access to one of
> the Jakarta projects.
>
> 2)CVS provides hooks/calls to be made
> before or after any check out, or ch
uple of tweaks to those that he prefers, and I'd be willing to listen
to those. I'm not familiar with what the Elements of Java Style promotes,
but I'm also willing to listen to what you have in mind, especially if
it's something that can be codified for Checkstyle to verify.
riate Commons classes
to this, too, as well as any others we wanted to link to.
--
Martin Cooper
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Matt Raible wrote:
> I don't know if this is a possibility, but it'd be pretty cool to use
> Java2HTML to generate browseable source code from the JavaDocs.
x27;.
> - a good many of them are probably due to the difference between the Sun
> Coding standards and the Apache coding standards. I have mostly
Well, the default coding conventions in Jakarta *are* the Sun coding
conventions, so I'd say we have a problem... ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
&g
ument, which is why DSSSL was designed to provide those semantics.)
For example, look at Tiles. I can create a definition in XML, and then I
can create further definitions that 'extend' the first one.
Just as other languages such as Java and C++ can be used for object
oriented programming,
I actually started to work on this
a while ago, but got derailed and never got back to it. I hope to find
some time to finish what I started after Struts 1.1 Final.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Craig
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
output through XSLT to generate customised HTML. However, if we move
to Maven (which I'd really like to do as soon as both 1.1 Final and Maven
are released), we may not need to worry about this.
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, James Turner wrote:
> > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > Sigh. OK, OK.
> >
> > But three changes I'd like to see in the code you posted earlier:
> >
> > 1) Instead of calling Class.forName(), you should u
to do that. I seem to recall
Craig admitting that he should have done that in the original code base.
;-)
--
Martin Cooper
>
> James
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 4:37 PM
> &
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, James Turner wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> > If you want to do this, I'd rather see it happen in the html-el taglib
> > than the regular html taglib. Struts-EL already depends on
> > JSTL, and is
> > designed to wor
than the regular html taglib. Struts-EL already depends on JSTL, and is
designed to work in cooperation with it, so it's a much more natural fit
than trying to sneak JSTL functionality into the regular tags.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> _
> James
&
pages don't yet address that well. We
need to sort this out...
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Martin Cooper wrote:
> The Struts 1.1 Beta 3 release is now available for download from more than
> 20 mirror sites worldwide. To download, follow this link:
>
> http://jakart
Beta 3".
Happy Strutting!
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fixed. Thanks.
(And you are dear to us, Pier. :)
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
> FYI, not acked... And I ain't "dear"... :-)
>
> Pier
>
>
> -- Forwarded Message
> From: Boujraf Abdelkrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+1
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> James Turner has been a long-time contributor of patches to Struts, took
> over commons-validator when it was languishing (he's a committer there),
> and is the author of Struts Kick Start. I'd like
ing.
The main Apache distribution site now know about Struts, too. See:
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/struts/
I plan on having the remainder of the mirroring setup completed within the
next week. I have not yet decided on whether to use a Struts-specific
download page, or use the generic J
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
th being used by the tests.
2) Don't worry about what version of JUnit to use, just use whatever is in
the Cactus distribution, whatever that happens to be, because if you use
something different, the tests may fail.
Happy testing!
--
Martin Cooper
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Martin Cooper wrote
ing changes and adding tests recently.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> It was originally marked for 1.1 in the build.properties.sample, but
> there has been one of those yet.
>
> Martin Cooper wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
> >
> >
>
the latest
sources at code freeze time tonight. This is true also for all the other
Commons components we use.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Using 1.0.2, we expose
>
> ==
> compile.library:
> [javac] Compiling 272 source files to
> J:\apache\jakarta\jakarta-struts\target\libra
hard time figuring out which...
I'm using Cactus 13-1.3 (the tests fail even earlier with more recent
versions) and Ant 1.5.1.
Anyone have any idea what's up?
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
he site with your updated release plan. Given that the
plan has changed from what people voted on, do we need to ((re-)re-)vote
on the updated release plan? I hope not, but I fear so.
FYI, we had 9 +1/+0 responses and no -1/-0 responses, so 9 committers
responding out of 14 currently listed.
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
> 12/24/2002 6:53:29 PM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The plan doesn't say we're committing to fixing the problem, it
> >says the problem report must be resolved before final release of
> >Struts 1.1. I b
o 1.1 final. Unless that happens before this
coming freeze date, we can't call this anything other than a Beta.
>
> Also, is the freeze date [29-JAN-2002 00:00] or [29-JAN-2002
> 24:59]?
By convention, the freeze date is neither of the above ;-) it's
29-DEC-2002 23:59 PST.
--
Mar
27;s not an issue now. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
>
> 12/22/2002 9:01:19 PM, Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >FYI - Not acked.
> >
> > Pier
> >
> >Begin forwarded message:
> >
> >> From: Kris Resellmo <[EMAIL PROTECT
Here's Rob's vote:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:06:58 -0800
From: Rob Leland Speaks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)
I DOn't have access to my nor
Has anyone ever seen the Povoglie link actually work? It's been in here
for a long time now, but every time I try to chase the link, it fails.
It seems to me that we should probably just remove it, rather than
preserving a broken link.
--
Martin Cooper
On 24 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g one user's credit card number to another user.
I haven't dug into the code sufficiently to determine whether or not this
is a real problem, but if it is, I would have expected all sorts of other
problems with DynaBeans to have surfaced before now, resulting from the
same underlying cause.
--
release
[ ] -1 I am against this proposal (must include a reason).
--
I am +1 on the Struts 1.1b3 release plan.
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: &
king of b3, I'm still waiting for feedback from the committers before I
post a revised release plan...
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Craig
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gt;Craig
> >
> The contrib project, that Oleg originally checked in, used it. It still
> has some interesting JDBC code
> that I would like to salvage.
I guess we could remove the commons-services.jar from the builds, but
still leave the contrib code in CVS for a while. Do you
ger. I'm all for removing the jar from
our builds, and for removing the code in contrib. I haven't seen people
using it, but I have seen confusion over whether people should use that or
use plugins. Removing services would avoid that confusion.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Craig
>
&
e to submit an
enhancement request. It is still an open issue.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> If this has been fixed, please let me know.
>
> Matt
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
&
th.
Getting old, memory fading... ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Are you using a release build of Ant? 1.5.1? If you built your own
> version of Ant, that could be an issue also as you have to have
> junit.jar available for the build to have it incorporated properly.
>
>
d not create
task or type of type: junit. Ant could not find the task or a class this
task relies upon.
I have JUnit, and all the appropriate properties and classpaths set. I
also have all the 'optional' pieces required.
Anyone have any idea what I forgot?
Thanks!
--
Martin Coope
e (and the bug list), is that enough?
--
Martin Cooper
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
> A number of new features have been added to Struts since the 1.1 Beta 2
> release, and many bugs have been fixed. Therefore, I propose that we
> release the tip of the main trunk in
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Peter A. Pilgrim wrote:
>
> Is there a wizard behind the machine bugzilla at Apache.org?
> Someone who could check the bugzilla is working?
You might try sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Martin Cooper
>
> --
> Peter Pilgrim
> ServerSide J
ions for Checkstyle to work with. I'm not suggesting
that we have to spend the time now to decide what our conventions are,
just suggesting that we, at some point in time, need to decide on a single
set of coding conventions for the entire Struts code base.
--
Martin Cooper
> For me, the
sed Apache mail seems to be a bit slow right now,
so it may just be that.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/query.cgi?GoAheadAndLogIn=1
> --
> Peter Pilgrim
> ServerSide Java Specialist
>
> My on-line resume and for interview v
/v1.0.1/
The Validator web site is located at:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/validator/
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dea (as it has completion
> assistance for commands too).
What happens if you forget the key sequence to invoke a command by name?
:-)
Remembering all those funky key sequences (or rather, failing to remember
them!) is the main reason I've never got into emacs. It always seems so
daunting, and
tself (as a part of another DTD,
> it might still be OK): DTD/Schema error - element 'small-icon' is
> undefined.
Fixed in the 20021213 nightly build.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Matt
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Cedric Dumoulin [mailto:[EMA
nd decreases response time for the user.
2) Request attributes are lost, so you have to persist everything you
need, either in the session or as hidden fields in the form, both of which
have their own sets of issues.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Edgar P. Dollin wrote:
>
> >My viewpoints are a
o
do, and therefore make this extension available in contrib (or perhaps
even core, given how many people seem to run into these issues).
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Ted Husted wrote:
> >>>Struts is not very powerful. There's no action chaining;
web site, but don't knoe if I myself
> have access to do it ?
FYI, the JavaDocs on the site were updated when I uploaded the 1.1-b3
release plan last night.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> -Rob
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
eze / Tag Date.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> David
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: [VOTE]
id the query like this: Open the
query page, select Struts as the Program, and select everything except
Enhancement for Severity. That's it. This morning, that comes up with 16
bugs.
Certainly 15 (16) bugs is more than we had when we released 1.1-b2, but is
that really too many for a Beta?
--
s listed, almost iidentical to those for
1.1-b1 and 1.1-b2. The process itself is identical.
However, if what you're suggesting is that we need to discuss a new
release process, then I guess we'd better hop to it! ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Robert Leland wrote:
>
proposal (must include a reason).
--
I am +1 on the Struts 1.1b3 release plan.
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
the latest nightlies are not
including the latest Validator code, that suggests there might be a glitch
in the build process.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
>
>
>
> _
> Add photos to you
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Rob Leland wrote:
> Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> >Hmm, I'm just reading this on December 1st... ;-)
> >
> >I'm just about finished with a complete system rebuild on my PC, so I'm
> >just about back in action. I'm not sure how muc
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:18:05 -0800 (PST)
> > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
rious shortcoming in the DynaActionForm infrastructure - that
properties cannot be added in subclasses.
Does anyone have any insight on why this is the way it is, and how best to
rectify the issues identified in (2) and (3)?
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
this on December 1st... ;-)
I'm just about finished with a complete system rebuild on my PC, so I'm
just about back in action. I'm not sure how much time I'll have this week,
but I'll see what I can do. I'm doubtful on a b3 this week, but I agree
with the sentiment - let's
pache.org).
There was a bug in the Commons Validator which caused it to look for the
local copy of the DTD in the wrong location. If you pick up a recent
nightly build of Validator, you should find that it fixes the problem you
are seeing.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Regards
> Ralph
>
all it
that would make sense.
The problem with calling it here is that I really don't think you want to
be going through all the trouble of filling out the form fields right
before Struts overwrites them with the parameters of an incoming request.
Remember that form beans are created for you whe
is with clause 2. BTW clause three has a spelling error
> (acknowlegement is acknowledgement).
You should read the ASL FAQ here:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/licence-FAQ.html
and follow up according to the instructions on that page if your questions
are not answered there.
--
Martin Coop
en there since the class
was first created. Probably a cut/paste mistake when adding in the XHTML
handling.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
>
>
>
> _
> Protect your PC - get McAfee.com V
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, James Holmes wrote:
> Cool...I just thought it would help save us some time
> on the mailing lists.
It might, but the problem is that I don't think most people actually look
inside DTD files. ;-(
--
Martin Cooper
>
> -james
>
> --- Robert L
that fussed about the name - isXhtml, useXhtml, or just xhtml. I
do agree with David Karr that just xhtml is rather subtle, but I'm not
going to veto it. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Regardless, I'll get the changes in soon so people can start playing with
> it.
>
> David
&
t
it is XHTML, instead of having the decision about whether or not to
generate XHTML be made externally (i.e. on the topmost page). Given that
the non-Struts tags on the page must also be explicitly XHTML, that makes
sense.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> --
> Eddie Bush
>
>
>
&g
e would be rendered as xhtml. This tag would only
> be useful for jsp included files.
>
> Another question: what if is nested inside
> ?
I think we should probably log a warning. In many cases, the resulting
output will work, but we need to flag that there's a potential problem.
store the value of its 'xhtml' attribute as a
request attribute, and use that in BaseHandlerTag.isXhtml().
Of these, I prefer the first approach because it makes it harder for
people to futz (technical term :) with the value in their pages.
--
Martin Cooper
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, David G
recommend to those of us just using
> text editors to turn off the 'trim trailing spaces' when saving. This
> causes just as much of a headache.
+1
JBuilder is also a big culprit here.
>
> Your thoughts?
Basically, I couldn't agree more. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
>
201 - 300 of 682 matches
Mail list logo
