Edgar P Dollin wrote:
1) It is fine that the basic tags in struts don't emit non-standard html,
but why do struts tags have to 'police' the emission of non-html. For many
intranet style projects, non standard html is important to achieve specific
required functionality. To deny the need for
Chris Gastin wrote:
As I can tell from the list I have opened topic that is pretty well
beaten. Let me first apologize. I did not realize this was such a
political topic in the Struts community.
There was a time when we were encouraging people to use the JSTL, and
there was a political bent
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 5:07 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
David Graham wrote:
There are 3 things that earn my -1 on tag enhancements:
1. Functionality already provided by the JSTL.
Just as an aside, I believe
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Gastin wrote:
As I can tell from the list I have opened topic that is pretty well
beaten. Let me first apologize. I did not realize this was such a
political topic in the Struts community.
There was a time when we were encouraging people
- Original Message -
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
However, at this time, we have a Struts-el taglib in circulation. We
even have a Struts-faces
, September 26, 2003 5:07 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
David Graham wrote:
There are 3 things that earn my -1 on tag enhancements:
1. Functionality already provided by the JSTL.
Just as an aside, I believe by -1 David means
--- Sgarlata Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
However, at this time, we have a Struts-el
Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Of course if I really want that I should probably just use
Velocity, huh? ;)
+1. I do =:)
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Graham wrote:
--- Sgarlata Matt [EMAIL
In the beginning, there was no Jakarta Taglibs, or inkling of something
like JSTL. So, Craig bravely put together a useful implementation of
some custom tags that did two things. First, they exposed the internals
of the Struts Controller framework. Second, they provided some basic
that
already exist?
Edgar
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 5:07 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
David Graham wrote:
There are 3 things that earn my -1 on tag
You could use a JSP expression to output the readonly='true' attribute of
the html:text or use the html-el library and use jstl to evaluate the
attribute.
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Chris Gastin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:29 AM
To: [EMAIL
Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3 years,
and probably has been implemented several times extending the Struts tags.
I am not opposed to such a feature, and would support it,
though other committers might not.
The key argument against it is that it would transform the html
attribute,
but I just included it as an example.
Just a thought...
Matt
- Original Message -
From: Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
Yes, This has been brought
Message-
From: Robert Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:23 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3
years, and probably has been implemented several times
Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Has anyone ever discussed adding a general-purpose attributes attribute to
the html tag library to support non-standard HTML like this? For example,
Yes, it was vetoed by several committers. Search the archives.
List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3 years,
and probably has been implemented several times extending the Struts
tags.
I am not opposed to such a feature
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3 years,
and probably has been implemented several times extending the Struts
tags.
I am not opposed to such a feature, and would support it,
though other committers might not.
The key
David Graham wrote:
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3 years,
and probably has been implemented several times extending the Struts
tags.
I am not opposed to such a feature, and would support it,
though other committers might not.
Edgar P Dollin wrote:
If the tags were structured differently so they were easier to extend
without breaking when new releases of struts come out these issues might not
come up. Of course, I myself have resigned myself to this issue since the
tags are such a political football on this list.
Edgar P Dollin wrote:
If the tags were structured differently so they were easier to extend
without breaking when new releases of struts come out these issues might not
come up. Of course, I myself have resigned myself to this issue since the
tags are such a political football on this list.
, September 25, 2003 2:23 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
It's only a political football in the sense that most of
the current
committers would prefer not to work on the HTML tags. If other folks
came to the fore and committed themselves
emit
HTML
4.01 or XHMTL 1.0, only a 'thin' layer over standard html tags, etc.
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:23 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:39 PM
Subject: RE: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
Whenever tag extendability enhancements are discussed, we always hear
complaints from a vocal minority but no tested working patches show up. I
haven't heard any good
a pain.)
Matt
- Original Message -
From: Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Has anyone ever discussed adding a general-purpose attributes
a pain.)
Matt
- Original Message -
From: Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Has anyone ever discussed adding a general-purpose attributes
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Has anyone ever discussed adding a general-purpose attributes
attribute
to
the html tag library to support non-standard HTML like this? For
example,
Yes
willing to work on those as well.
Does this sound reasonable?
David
Niall
- Original Message -
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:39 PM
Subject: RE: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
Whenever
PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
--- Edgar P Dollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is more than a 'preference' based on the rapidity with which
INVALID or WONTFIX is stamped
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
It's only a political football in the sense that most of
the current
committers would prefer not to work on the HTML tags. If other folks
came to the fore and committed themselves to supporting those
Sounds good. I'll put some thought into it.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
--- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
David Graham wrote:
--- Sgarlata Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, here's another idea. I searched the archives for it and couldn't
find
it.
How about two simple changes:
1) Add a new renderExtraAttributes() method that gives people the chance
to
throw non-standard HTML into their tags that
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
David Graham wrote:
--- Sgarlata Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, here's another idea. I searched the archives for it and couldn't
find
it.
How about two simple changes:
1) Add a new renderExtraAttributes() method that gives people
Chris Gastin wrote:
Rob:
I am not an contributer, but I am a young developer. I am willing to step up
and support these abilities in the struts tags
Great !
I have come to believe that young/single developers older/grown
kids/empty nesters developers are better
situated to be Open Source
, 2003 2:23 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
It's only a political football in the sense that most of
the current
committers would prefer not to work on the HTML tags. If other
folks
came to the fore and committed themselves
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Graham wrote:
--- Sgarlata Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, here's another idea. I searched the archives for it and couldn't
find
it.
How about two simple changes:
1) Add a new renderExtraAttributes() method that gives people the
36 matches
Mail list logo
