>> From: MARK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:57 AM
>> To: Struts Developers List
>> Subject: RE: [Resources] XMLMessageResources and Proposal
>>
>>
>> Why use xml for the message resources in the first place?
>> Using XMl do
A Dissabte 12 Octubre 2002 00:25, Craig R. McClanahan va escriure:
> Do *you*
> really want to have to type all those messages in more than once? Or
> could I use the same source document to produce both the end user docs and
> the message resources file for the webapp?
>
Is a plain tex
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, James Mitchell wrote:
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:11:49 -0400
> From: James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [Resources]
Oh, one thing I forgot to mention.
Not sure if we overlooked it, but I was wondering how are you handling
special (XML/HTML) character data? Especially for Struts (errors.header and
errors.footer)
One peice of functionality that I am adding will (for the most part) take
care of that in a clean
> -Original Message-
> From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 3:58 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: [Resources] XMLMessageResources and Proposal
>
>
> James Mitchell wrote:
>
> >I'm involved in t
s Developers List
> Subject: Re: [Resources] XMLMessageResources and Proposal
>
>
> I was reading a thread last night somewhere off in bozo-land where this
> fellow was trying *so* hard to "shove" patterns into his design it was
> hillarious. I won't go into de
ers List
Subject: Re: [Resources] XMLMessageResources and Proposal
I was reading a thread last night somewhere off in bozo-land where this
fellow was trying *so* hard to "shove" patterns into his design it was
hillarious. I won't go into details - but shove is an appropriate
desc
James Mitchell wrote:
>I'm involved in this as a way to help others and add to list of
>functionality provided by this framework. Personally, I prefer
>DBMessageResources. (You'll see why when I finish the Management Tool for
>it)
>
>This topic has been discussed many times, over many months, a
I was reading a thread last night somewhere off in bozo-land where this
fellow was trying *so* hard to "shove" patterns into his design it was
hillarious. I won't go into details - but shove is an appropriate
description.
Sometimes, people want so badly to use a "new thing" that ... well they
At 03:33 PM 10/11/2002, Antoni Reus wrote:
>A Divendres 11 Octubre 2002 20:56, MARK va escriure:
> > Why use xml for the message resources in the first place? Using XMl doesnt
> > add any inherent value. The properties file is fine, easy to use/read, and
> > XML is way too wordy, constricting.
> -Original Message-
> From: MARK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:57 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: [Resources] XMLMessageResources and Proposal
>
>
> Why use xml for the message resources in the first place?
&g
ftware Engineer/Struts Evangelist
http://www.open-tools.org
> -Original Message-
> From: MARK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:57 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: [Resources] XMLMessageResources and Proposal
>
>
> Why use xml
LOL
James Mitchell
Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
http://www.open-tools.org
> -Original Message-
> From: Antoni Reus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 3:33 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: [Resources] XMLMessageResourc
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:29 PM
> To: 'Struts Developers List'; Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [Resources] XMLMessageResources and Proposal
>
>
> > -Original
A Divendres 11 Octubre 2002 20:56, MARK va escriure:
> Why use xml for the message resources in the first place? Using XMl doesnt
> add any inherent value. The properties file is fine, easy to use/read, and
> XML is way too wordy, constricting. Seems like its not advantageous to me,
> perhaps I
Why use xml for the message resources in the first place? Using XMl doesnt add any
inherent value. The properties file is fine, easy to use/read, and XML is way too
wordy, constricting. Seems like its not advantageous to me, perhaps Im missing
something. There is already a tool that builds
> -Original Message-
> From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 8:33 AM
> To: Struts Developers List; Commons Developers List
> Subject: [Resources] XMLMessageResources and Proposal
>
>
> Martin (and others)
>
> On a suggestion by Craig, I had a
17 matches
Mail list logo
