Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-26 Thread Ted Husted
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:22:48 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote: As I've been saying (a lot, it seems, lately) on struts-user, I think there are legitimate Struts JSP tags like html:messages that are not best replaced by JSTL. Any time Struts tools put resources in special locations in request or

StrutsContext/ConfigHelper (was Re: Making Struts Build Easier)

2004-03-26 Thread Joe Germuska
At 7:00 AM -0500 3/26/04, Ted Husted wrote: Another way to go would be to provide a API object in the request that the tags, or any other presentation technology, could use to access framework resources. In this way, no one else would need to the various special locations, only where to find

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-26 Thread David Graham
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:22:48 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote: As I've been saying (a lot, it seems, lately) on struts-user, I think there are legitimate Struts JSP tags like html:messages that are not best replaced by JSTL. Any time Struts tools put

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27943] - resource files for non-default modules not loading correctly

2004-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27943. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27332] - The bundle attr do not have subapp resolution.

2004-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27332. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27384] - Add support for other keys in saveMessages functions

2004-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27384. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26668] - errors messages tags enhancement: make them show only errors/messages

2004-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26668. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

FIFO ordering of ActionErrors

2004-03-26 Thread Haroon Rafique
I sent this to struts-user with no responses. I thought I would try here before posting a bug report. Hi listers, I have been working on this issue for the last couple of days but haven't found any satisfactory answers through the usual channels (mailing list archives, API, and some source

FW: html:text -- value attribute won't take rtexprvalue

2004-03-26 Thread Bender, James
Hi, I'm new to Struts and have searched without luck on this one: I have an html:text ... that I'm simply trying to put a runtime expression into, like % String rtexpr = bob; % html:text property=searchType value=%=rtexpr % And instead of interprestting the rtexprvalue bob, it

RE: html:text -- value attribute won't take rtexprvalue

2004-03-26 Thread Wendy Smoak
From: Bender, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm new to Struts and have searched without luck on this one: I have an html:text ... that I'm simply trying to put a runtime expression into, like % String rtexpr = bob; % html:text property=searchType value=%=rtexpr % And instead of

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-26 Thread Peter A. Pilgrim
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Quoting Peter A. Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Joe Germuska wrote: Whether the classic and el taglibs are one chunk or two isn't hugely important to me either -- I would prefer that this decision be made by developers who've done more work on that code to date.

Re: StrutsContext/ConfigHelper (was Re: Making Struts Build Easier)

2004-03-26 Thread Ted Husted
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:56:11 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote: I love this. I actually hadn't seen it before. We had talked briefly a few days ago about a StrutsContext as the argument to Action.execute() and Renderer.render() -- but it looks to me like this class is everything I would expect that

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-26 Thread Tim Chen
... logic:match no equalivant in JSTL 1.0 but exists String functions in JSTL 1.1 ... logic:match equivalent is c:if test=${foo.bar eq 'hello world'}xxx/c:if -Tim Peter A. Pilgrim wrote: Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Quoting Peter A. Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Joe Germuska wrote: Whether

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-26 Thread David Graham
--- Peter A. Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip bean:size we need a simple tag lib action for JSP 1.2 and JSTL 1.0 to get the size of java.uitl.Collection until there is widespread support JSP 2.0 JSTL 1.1 The current proposal is for Struts 2.0 to be based on Servlet 2.4/JSP 2.0 so we

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-26 Thread Kris Schneider
Nope. logic:match does substring matching. Quoting Tim Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ... logic:match no equalivant in JSTL 1.0 but exists String functions in JSTL 1.1 ... logic:match equivalent is c:if test=${foo.bar eq 'hello world'}xxx/c:if -Tim Peter A. Pilgrim wrote: Craig R.

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-26 Thread Tim Chen
You're right (as usual ;)) I was using the String taglib in addition to the JSTL 1.0 taglib to do the test. (duh) Although looking at it now.. there isnt any support for begin and ends in that neither. -Tim Kris Schneider wrote: Nope. logic:match does substring matching. Quoting Tim Chen

Re: StrutsContext/ConfigHelper (was Re: Making Struts Build Easier)

2004-03-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED]: At 7:00 AM -0500 3/26/04, Ted Husted wrote: Another way to go would be to provide a API object in the request that the tags, or any other presentation technology, could use to access framework resources. In this way, no one else would need to the

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-26 Thread Kris Schneider
With JSTL 1.1 (JSP 2.0), you get a set of string manipulaton functions (which Peter was referring to) that includes: fn:contains(string, substring) fn:startsWith(string, prefix) fn:endsWith(string, suffix) In addition, you also get a length function that operates on collections and strings:

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-26 Thread David Graham
--- Kris Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nope. logic:match does substring matching. IMO, any tag that does not interact with Struts' core resources should live in the Jakarta Taglibs project. This allows non-Struts projects to benefit from the functionality while freeing Struts to focus on

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-26 Thread Kris Schneider
+1. Just keeping the functionality facts straight... Quoting David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]: --- Kris Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nope. logic:match does substring matching. IMO, any tag that does not interact with Struts' core resources should live in the Jakarta Taglibs project.

Re: Making Struts Build Easier (Re: coming out for JSF + Struts, was: Struts JSR?)

2004-03-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Peter A. Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Quoting Peter A. Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Joe Germuska wrote: Whether the classic and el taglibs are one chunk or two isn't hugely important to me either -- I would prefer that this decision be made by

Re: FIFO ordering of ActionErrors

2004-03-26 Thread Haroon Rafique
On Today at 11:15am, HR=Haroon Rafique [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HR I sent this to struts-user with no responses. I thought I would try HR here before posting a bug report. HR I have found the problem in src/share/org/apache/struts/action/ActionMessages.java and I'll be posting a bug report

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27992] New: - FIFO ordering in ActionErrors

2004-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27992. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27992] - FIFO ordering in ActionErrors

2004-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27992. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: StrutsContext/ConfigHelper (was Re: Making Struts Build Easier)

2004-03-26 Thread Ted Husted
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:32:20 -0800, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Quoting Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wouldn't the context object used by struts-chain contain everything you might need in Velocity-land? It would be a shame to invent a second context object if we're going that direction

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27992] - FIFO ordering in ActionErrors

2004-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27992. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27992] - FIFO ordering in ActionMessages

2004-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27992. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27992] - FIFO ordering in ActionMessages

2004-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27992. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27992] - FIFO ordering in ActionMessages

2004-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27992. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27992] - FIFO ordering in ActionMessages

2004-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27992. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27992] - FIFO ordering in ActionMessages

2004-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27992. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27992] - FIFO ordering in ActionMessages

2004-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27992. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.