A little portal :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 28 June 2001 23:36
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Oleg V Alexeev
> Subject: Re[2]: New name for Components / Extended Templates?
>
>
> Sorry to be a bit dense, but 'po
Sorry to be a bit dense, but 'portlets' isn't at all clear to me. Given
that I know what 'applets' and 'servlets' are, I would have guessed that
'portlets' had something to do with a TCP/IP (or maybe HTTP) port, but I
can't see how this would relate to Components, so I think I must be wrong.
W
Portlet gets my votes as well.
> -Original Message-
> From: Oleg V Alexeev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 28 June 2001 21:27
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re[2]: New name for Components / Extended Templates?
>
>
> Hello Chuck,
>
> Thursday, J
Hello Chuck,
Thursday, June 28, 2001, 11:14:00 PM, you wrote:
CS> How about Portlet? When I look at the features that's the first thing that
CS> comes to mind.
Good choice. Components, blocks, pieces - all this terms do not point
to the general position of this package. Portlets term is clear
