A little portal :-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 28 June 2001 23:36
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Oleg V Alexeev
> Subject: Re[2]: New name for Components / Extended Templates?
>
>
> Sorry to be a bit dense, but 'portlets' isn't at all clear to me. Given
> that I know what 'applets' and 'servlets' are, I would have guessed that
> 'portlets' had something to do with a TCP/IP (or maybe HTTP) port, but I
> can't see how this would relate to Components, so I think I must
> be wrong.
> What's a portlet?
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> At 01:27 PM 6/28/01, Oleg V Alexeev wrote:
> >Hello Chuck,
> >
> >Thursday, June 28, 2001, 11:14:00 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >CS> How about Portlet? When I look at the features that's the
> first thing
> >that
> >CS> comes to mind.
> >
> >Good choice. Components, blocks, pieces - all this terms do not point
> >to the general position of this package. Portlets term is clear and
> >easy to understand.
> >
> >CS> -----Original Message-----
> >CS> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >CS> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 1:51 PM
> >CS> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >CS> Subject: Re: New name for Components / Extended Templates?
> >
> >
> >CS> What name would make sense to you, Jonathan?
> >
> >CS> Jonathan wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Please just make the name something that makes sense. Something that
> > >> implies its function.
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Best regards,
> > Oleg mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
