Re[2]: New name for Components / Extended Templates?

[Martin Cooper]

Sorry to be a bit dense, but 'portlets' isn't at all clear to me. Given 
that I know what 'applets' and 'servlets' are, I would have guessed that 
'portlets' had something to do with a TCP/IP (or maybe HTTP) port, but I 
can't see how this would relate to Components, so I think I must be wrong. 
What's a portlet?

--
Martin Cooper


At 01:27 PM 6/28/01, Oleg V Alexeev wrote:
>Hello Chuck,
>
>Thursday, June 28, 2001, 11:14:00 PM, you wrote:
>
>CS> How about Portlet?  When I look at the features that's the first thing 
>that
>CS> comes to mind.
>
>Good choice. Components, blocks, pieces - all this terms do not point
>to the general position of this package. Portlets term is clear and
>easy to understand.
>
>CS> -----Original Message-----
>CS> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>CS> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 1:51 PM
>CS> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>CS> Subject: Re: New name for Components / Extended Templates?
>
>
>CS> What name would make sense to you, Jonathan?
>
>CS> Jonathan wrote:
> >>
> >> Please just make the name something that makes sense.  Something that
> >> implies its function.
>
>
>
>--
>Best regards,
>  Oleg                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]