: Assenza, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 6:28 AM
Subject: RE: some comparision between JSP/struts and velocity
I tend to agree with Tim here, but only in certain circumstances. If you
place very specific HTML code in your tag library then that tag library
Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 5:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: some comparision between JSP/struts and velocity
One thing to consider here is the partitioning of functionality across tag
libraries. For example, Struts currently
tags, but it's very generic HTML that can be used again and
again without much actual change to the Java code itself. :)
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: Tim Colson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 9:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: some comparision between JSP
Scriptlets OK for view only?
Another developer in my group and I discussed this at length last week. I
believe scriptlets in the view to be bad practice...or at least a slippery
slope towards badness. grin
I suggest that there are two levels of separation we are trying to achieve.
1)
Tim Colson wrote:
Scriptlets OK for view only?
Another developer in my group and I discussed this at length last week. I
believe scriptlets in the view to be bad practice...or at least a slippery
slope towards badness. grin
I suggest that there are two levels of separation we are
PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2001 00:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: some comparision between JSP/struts and velocity
Scriptlets OK for view only?
Another developer in my group and I discussed this at length last week. I
believe scriptlets in the view to be bad practice...or at least
Niall Pemberton suggested
...if the Struts tags dont do what you want then write your
own. Then you dont have to use scriptlets, you have a re-useable bit of
functionality, the web designers are happy and you dont have to use
Velocity.
While a custom tag is an option; this bit of
: RE: some comparision between JSP/struts and velocity
Niall Pemberton suggested
...if the Struts tags dont do what you want then write your
own. Then you dont have to use scriptlets, you have a re-useable bit of
functionality, the web designers are happy and you dont have to use
Velocity
On 30 Jul 2001 18:20:29 -0700, Tim Colson wrote:
While a custom tag is an option; this bit of functionality would have
required embedding javascript code and html inside the custom tag lib. To
me, putting view specific code like inside a tag library is also a slippery
slope in the quest to
This month's Java Developer's Journal has an article comparing jsp/struts
and velocity/turbine. Pretty interesting read, especially since I wasn't
too familiar with velocity/turbine.
-jason
suhas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/27/2001 06:40 AM
Please respond to struts-user
To:
-From: Greg Maletic
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: July 27, 2001 1:45
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: some
comparision between JSP/struts and velocity
This article contains an assertion that goes unquestioned in a lot of
the documentationfor templating engines, but it's one
Totally agree! Exactly what I was thinking when I read
that!
-Original Message-From: Greg Maletic
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 10:45
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: some
comparision between JSP/struts and velocity
This article contains
12 matches
Mail list logo
