RE: struts-workflow-extension and DynaValidatorForm

2004-03-12 Thread shirishchandra.sakhare
Hi Dean, The struts workflow extension will just work as well with dynaValidatorForms or any other type of bean you use as form bean.The only point where it differs from standard struts is the ActionMapping.It uses a ActionMapping class of its own.But that also can be taken care of. Just start

RE: Struts Workflow - Questions ?

2004-03-03 Thread shirishchandra.sakhare
Also you need not use the session scope for the form.What ever data you want to share across pages, you can use workflow container to hold that data... Have a look at the Demo application and Test Application(available with the standard download ).The test application in fact demonstrates

RE: Struts Workflow

2004-02-27 Thread shirishchandra.sakhare
a look at the extension and let me know if you still have any questions. HTH. Regards, Shirish. -Original Message- From: Hookom, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 7:58 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: Struts Workflow No matter what, I would

Re: Struts Workflow

2004-02-26 Thread Geeta Ramani
Mike, search this list's archives. This was discussed a few days ago.. Regards, Geeta Mike Duffy wrote: Does anyone have any great ideas on creating customizable workflows in Struts? __ Do you Yahoo!? Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.

Re: Struts Workflow

2004-02-26 Thread Alvaro Martinez
You can visit this web: http://www.livinglogic.de/Struts/ Alvaro - Original Message - From: Mike Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 7:08 PM Subject: Struts Workflow Does anyone have any great ideas on creating

Re: Struts Workflow

2004-02-26 Thread Michael McGrady
My suggestion is to build your own. This is fairly simple stuff that must be wedded to your own way of coding your site or application that will fit your business requirements. Make it general for use in other places. Create, for example, you own do/undo/redo to work with but independent of

RE: Struts Workflow

2004-02-26 Thread Hookom, Jacob
, February 26, 2004 12:42 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Struts Workflow My suggestion is to build your own. This is fairly simple stuff that must be wedded to your own way of coding your site or application that will fit your business requirements. Make it general for use in other

Re: Struts workflow problem.Request for enhancement to struts.

2004-01-23 Thread Hubert Rabago
Here's part of a thread on struts-dev related to your question: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg20449.html --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have used the workflow extension for struts (http://www.livinglogic.de/Struts/introduction.html) and found it very useful. My question is

Re: [Struts Workflow Extension] Any volunteers for furtherdevelopment and maintenance?

2003-12-16 Thread Matthias Bauer
Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:09 AM Subject: Re: [Struts Workflow Extension] Any volunteers for furtherdevelopment and maintenance? Matthias, How much of your spare time have you been spending on it ? I have some spare time but I don't know if I have

Re: [Struts Workflow Extension] Any volunteers for further development and maintenance?

2003-12-15 Thread Marcus Peixoto
Matthias, How much of your spare time have you been spending on it ? I have some spare time but I don't know if I have enough experience in Java to handle it. []'s Marcus Em Seg, 2003-12-15 s 08:41, Matthias Bauer escreveu: Hi everybody, I am looking for someone who would like to take

Re: [Struts Workflow Extension] Any volunteers for furtherdevelopment and maintenance?

2003-12-15 Thread Martin Gainty
- Original Message - From: Marcus Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:09 AM Subject: Re: [Struts Workflow Extension] Any volunteers for furtherdevelopment and maintenance? Matthias, How much of your spare time have you been

Re: [Struts Workflow Extension] Any volunteers for furtherdevelopment and maintenance?

2003-12-15 Thread Matthias Bauer
: [Struts Workflow Extension] Any volunteers for furtherdevelopment and maintenance? Matthias, How much of your spare time have you been spending on it ? I have some spare time but I don't know if I have enough experience in Java to handle it. []'s Marcus Em Seg, 2003-12-15 s 08:41, Matthias Bauer

Re: [Struts Workflow Extension] Any volunteers for furtherdevelopment and maintenance?

2003-12-15 Thread Markus
15, 2003 7:09 AM Subject: Re: [Struts Workflow Extension] Any volunteers for furtherdevelopment and maintenance? Matthias, How much of your spare time have you been spending on it ? I have some spare time but I don't know if I have enough experience in Java to handle it. []'s

Re: Struts workflow question

2003-12-02 Thread Matthias Bauer
Tommy Holm - TELMORE wrote: Hi I have a problem which best is described as follows. I have a primary workflow(WF1) that at a certain time branches off to a secondary workflow. It is left in a state so that progess can be continued at a later stage. I my new workflow (WF2) I describe that a

Re: [Struts Workflow] - The workflow definition should allow for dynamic navigation

2003-12-02 Thread Matthias Bauer
First of all my apologies for the late response to your mails you also sent to me personally, but I was on vacation and did not check my E-Mails for quite a while. I feel that the workflow definition, beside of violation detection, should allow for dynamic navigation. The framework should

Re: [Struts Workflow] Test application - why two actions for loop? [solved]

2003-10-22 Thread Axel Gross
Thanks Mathias! That makes everything clear. I think you should do that documentation update, it's so crucial to workflow security and at least I didn't get that point without asking :)) Dankeschön nochmals! Axel On 2003-10-21 at 09:21:08 +0200, Matthias Bauer wrote: Axel, your suggestion

Re: [Struts Workflow] Test application - why two actions for loop?

2003-10-21 Thread Matthias Bauer
Axel, your suggestion unforunately does not work as you would expect. The action definition you are suggesting defines nextState=2 and newState=2. This means, that after the action has been executed, the wf1 is in state 2. Thus, any action that does not change the state of wf1 can be executed

RE: [Struts Workflow] Test application - why two actions for loop?

2003-10-20 Thread shirishchandra.sakhare
can you elaborate a little? Too less info :-(( -Original Message- From: Axel Gross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 5:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Struts Workflow] Test application - why two actions for loop? Hello! I had a close look to the test

Re: [Struts Workflow] Test application - why two actions for loop?

2003-10-20 Thread Axel Gross
Well. If you take a look at the struts-config.xml you'll see that there are two actions defined: wf1St2Loop and wf1St2LoopEnd The second is just a forward changing workflow values. I just can't figure out a reason, why there are two instead of one simpler action. for your convenience,

RE: [struts workflow extension]workflow problem incase of validation errors.

2003-09-30 Thread shirishchandra.sakhare
Hi Mattias, We have run into another problem with the workflow extension. We are not using the auto validation mechanism of struts(We set validate=false in action mapping.) Following is the scenario where we run into problem.The relevant workflow action mapping parameters are indicated in

Re: [struts workflow extension]workflow problem incase of validation errors.

2003-09-30 Thread Matthias Bauer
Shirish, I really like your mails, because you always seem to be answering your questions for yourself. :-) It does not make any difference whether the validation checks are done in the form or the action: The workflows' states have already been updated before. Thus, you need to point your

Re: [struts workflow extension] design question

2003-09-29 Thread Matthias Bauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Matthias, I will have a close look at the demo and test applications.I need some generic way to add the workflow extention to my existing working screens so that the user will be kept informed of the workflow violations and given a choice to leave the workflow or

RE: [struts workflow extension] design question

2003-09-29 Thread shirishchandra.sakhare
- From: Matthias Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 9:47 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [struts workflow extension] design question [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Matthias, I will have a close look at the demo and test applications.I need some

Re: [struts workflow extension] design question

2003-09-29 Thread Matthias Bauer
Mailing List Subject: Re: [struts workflow extension] design question [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Matthias, I will have a close look at the demo and test applications.I need some generic way to add the workflow extention to my existing working screens so that the user will be kept informed

RE: [struts workflow extension] design question

2003-09-26 Thread shirishchandra.sakhare
:26 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [struts workflow extension] design question Shirish, why do you want to change the workflow extension for doing this? Maybe you want to have a look at the demo application. If I am getting you right, I suppose I am doing exactly what you want

Re: [struts workflow extension and tiles]Problem with configuring the request processor

2003-09-25 Thread Matthias Bauer
Shirish, what Struts version are you using? I certainly tested the TilesWorkflowRequestProcessor together with the Tile plugin and it worked fine in my setup. Has the Tiles initialization code changed lately? --- Matthias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I am evaluating the struts workflow

RE: [struts workflow extension and tiles]Problem with configuring the request processor

2003-09-25 Thread shirishchandra.sakhare
AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [struts workflow extension and tiles]Problem with configuring the request processor Shirish, what Struts version are you using? I certainly tested the TilesWorkflowRequestProcessor together with the Tile plugin and it worked fine in my setup. Has

Re: [struts workflow extension and tiles]Problem with configuring the request processor

2003-09-25 Thread Matthias Bauer
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:22 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [struts workflow extension and tiles]Problem with configuring the request processor Shirish, what Struts version are you using? I certainly tested the TilesWorkflowRequestProcessor together

Re: [struts workflow extension] design question

2003-09-25 Thread Matthias Bauer
Shirish, why do you want to change the workflow extension for doing this? Maybe you want to have a look at the demo application. If I am getting you right, I suppose I am doing exactly what you want to do: Just let the action that handles the workflow violation put the application specific

Re: [Struts Workflow] Who is using it?

2003-05-31 Thread Matthias Bauer
I know of about 30 people having me contacted directly for questions since May 15, when version 1.0.0 of the extension came out. All of them seemed to be very much willing to use the extension in their projects. Before Version 1.0.0 there were about 400 downloads per month for about half a

Re: struts workflow

2002-11-25 Thread Matthias Bauer
Anyone has implementing an workflow engine or workflow application with struts? Sorry to answer so late, but I did not have the chance to check the mailing list for some time... Depending how you define workflow engine you can have a look at http://www.livinglogic.de/Struts/ . I know two

RE: struts workflow

2002-11-16 Thread Adolfo Miguelez
: struts workflow Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:32:07 -0600 Diego, At my company we are using struts and weblogic intergrater. It is going pretty good with the development. Shay -Original Message- From: Diego Campodonico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:11 AM

RE: struts workflow

2002-11-15 Thread Shay Logan
Diego, At my company we are using struts and weblogic intergrater. It is going pretty good with the development. Shay -Original Message- From: Diego Campodonico [mailto:dcampodonico;netversatile.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: struts

Re: [Struts Workflow Extension] Help

2002-07-29 Thread Matthias Bauer
Yes, specifying multiple prevStates is allowed. --- Matthias Amit Harsola wrote: Hi Matthias, Thanks. It worked. I want to know one more thing. Can there be 2 prevStates for a single action. action path=/main type=MainAction set-property property=primaryWorkflow value=w1 /

Re: [Struts Workflow Extension] Help

2002-07-28 Thread Amit Harsola
Hi Matthias, Thanks. It worked. I want to know one more thing. Can there be 2 prevStates for a single action. action path=/main type=MainAction set-property property=primaryWorkflow value=w1 / set-property property=prevState value=1 / set-property property=prevState value=2 / set-property

Re: Struts Workflow Extension with CactusServletTestCase

2002-04-24 Thread Matthias Bauer
Chris, I have not used any Cactus Test Cases with the Workflow Extension, but the exception indicates, that the mapping that is passed into the Action's perform method is not an instance of com.livinglogic.cms.struts.workflow.ApplicationMapping. How to resolve this issue depends on what

Re: Struts Workflow Extension Package V0.9 and Struts 1.1

2002-03-01 Thread Robson Miranda
Hi... I also did some testings with this package in Struts 1.1, and got it working. There was some modifications in that must be done in the example application so it can work: In web.xml, the init-parameter mapping is not used anymore. Instead, you must add