On 27.10.2014, at 04:27, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
Good morning,
Robert appears to have stepped up to help our Willem to get this right,
but the more people work on this and help figure out what's the right way
to do things, the better.
indeed, more people needed here. I cannot
On 27 October 2014 05:18, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 01:03:28PM +0300, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
please ignore anything in particular if you see fit.
i'm not really advocating any of these.
[PATCH 1/9] MainWindow: prevent a possible crash on re-plan
[PATCH
Good morning...
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 08:42:12AM +0100, Robert Helling wrote:
Robert appears to have stepped up to help our Willem to get this right,
but the more people work on this and help figure out what's the right way
to do things, the better.
indeed, more people needed here. I
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:37 PM, William Perry wmpe...@kadath.us wrote:
I just finished by CCR training down in Bonaire last week so I don’t have a
lot of experience, but I did find that minor depth changes did not impact
the loop volume enough for me to feel the need to add diluent. My
I can probably get my instructor to run a download against a bunch of
shearwaters or Nitek Qs with the 4th cell monitoring if we need test data for
subsurface or libdivecomputer.
Maybe I can convince my wife that I need to buy the rebreather a bit earlier
than planned so I can help… :)
-bill
On Oct 27, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Rodrigo Severo rodr...@fabricadeideias.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:37 PM, William Perry wmpe...@kadath.us wrote:
I just finished by CCR training down in Bonaire last week so I don’t have a
lot of experience, but I did find that minor depth
On Oct 27, 2014, at 03:42 PM, Rodrigo Severo rodr...@fabricadeideias.com
wrote:
Bill,
I agree: 1/2 foot is noise, 10 m is significant.
What value do you think we should use as limit? I just proposed 1 m on
my previous email to Robert but I'm not sure if this value is big
enough.
What do
On Oct 27, 2014, at 04:26 PM, William Perry wmpe...@kadath.us wrote:
I can probably get my instructor to run a download against a bunch of
shearwaters or Nitek Qs with the 4th cell monitoring if we need test data for
subsurface or libdivecomputer.
I've got tons of Shearwater data. Can
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:23:11PM +, Paul Sargent wrote:
So who are the rebreather divers besides Willem who are helping to get
this right and are especially testing this as thoroughly as possible.
I'd hate to release 4.3 and announve rebreather support and then have to
say never
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:26:52AM -0400, William Perry wrote:
I can probably get my instructor to run a download against a bunch of
shearwaters or Nitek Qs with the 4th cell monitoring if we need test
data for subsurface or libdivecomputer.
I'll leave this to the experts to ask for the data
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:29:47AM -0400, William Perry wrote:
I just finished by CCR training down in Bonaire last week so I don’t have
a
lot of experience, but I did find that minor depth changes did not impact
the loop volume enough for me to feel the need to add diluent. My
We cannot zero setpoint value upon import if the current and previous
values are zero. This is because on setpoint context a value of 0 means
open circuit.
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia miika.tur...@gmail.com
---
dive.c | 11 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git
Ok, I'll try to put some time aside over the next couple of days to have a
play.
On Oct 27, 2014, at 05:05 PM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:23:11PM +, Paul Sargent wrote:
So who are the rebreather divers besides Willem who are helping to get
this
A few notes...
- I would like to have a first beta released no later than Nov 10.
- I have fixed the script that created the daily builds. It was still
uploading them to the old site. :facepalm:
- I will make a go/no-go decision on some of the features in a week or so;
what that means is that
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
With the benefit of absolutely know subject matter expertize, I think what
would make sense is to smooth out the depth graph. Something like a
gliding average across one minute - that should remove jitter and the
quick pop
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:34:37PM -0400, John Van Ostrand wrote:
What other things are partly done and likely / unlikely to be finished in
the next two weeks?
Any chance the Cochran import can make it in?
That's more a libdivecomputer question. Or are there Subsurface patches as
well
The device supports a up to 60 chars custom text. This limits the
LineEdit to that amount, so users see when they reach the max limit.
Signed-off-by: Anton Lundin gla...@acc.umu.se
---
qt-ui/configuredivecomputerdialog.ui | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git
This cleans up some styling and syntax in the Configure Dive Computer
code path.
Signed-off-by: Anton Lundin gla...@acc.umu.se
---
configuredivecomputerthreads.cpp | 20 +---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configuredivecomputerthreads.cpp
The OSTC supports a bit different functionalities than the OSTC3 does.
The unsupported bits are
setBrightness
setCalibrationGas
setCompassGain
setDiveMode - Bult into setDecoType (OC/CCR)
setDiveModeColor - Lots of different colors
setFlipScreen
setLanguage - Controlled via flashing different
This adds code to decode the configuration blocks from the OSTC.
Signed-off-by: Anton Lundin gla...@acc.umu.se
---
configuredivecomputerthreads.cpp | 250 +++
1 file changed, 250 insertions(+)
diff --git a/configuredivecomputerthreads.cpp
This code is to debug the rest of the existing CF's, so we can look at
the rest of the values.
Signed-off-by: Anton Lundin gla...@acc.umu.se
---
configuredivecomputerthreads.cpp | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/configuredivecomputerthreads.cpp
This adds code to decode the custom functions data.
We only decode the relevant CF's. The relevant ones are chosen by which
ones have corresponding settings in the OSTC3.
Signed-off-by: Anton Lundin gla...@acc.umu.se
---
configuredivecomputerthreads.cpp | 57
On the OSTC's the salinity is in kg/l and is stored as kg/l * 100
Signed-off-by: Anton Lundin gla...@acc.umu.se
---
qt-ui/configuredivecomputerdialog.cpp | 4 ++--
qt-ui/configuredivecomputerdialog.ui | 11 +++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 27 October 2014 22:44, Robert Helling hell...@atdotde.de wrote:
On 27 Oct 2014, at 21:03, Lubomir I. Ivanov neolit...@gmail.com wrote:
this is Robert's code (CC) so perhaps he or others have some ideas.
on a brief look, DiveLogExportDialog::export_depths() would not always
produce a
This creates a delegate to simplify the handling of gas components and
the change depth.
Signed-off-by: Anton Lundin gla...@acc.umu.se
---
qt-ui/configuredivecomputerdialog.cpp | 44 +++
qt-ui/configuredivecomputerdialog.h | 20
2 files changed,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Anton Lundin gla...@acc.umu.se wrote:
-#define READ_SETTING(_OSTC3_SETTING, _DEVICE_DETAIL) \
+#define READ_SETTING(_OSTC3_SETTING, _DEVICE_DETAIL); \
That extra ';' as the first token in the macro definition seems entirely broken.
rc
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 02:13:54PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Anton Lundin gla...@acc.umu.se wrote:
-#define READ_SETTING(_OSTC3_SETTING, _DEVICE_DETAIL) \
+#define READ_SETTING(_OSTC3_SETTING, _DEVICE_DETAIL); \
That extra ';' as the first token in
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:04:57PM +0100, Anton Lundin wrote:
On 27 October, 2014 - Anton Lundin wrote:
Here is the results of my last little project. This stack of patches
adds support for reading and writing the config blocks of the OSTC
devices.
All this bit magic was a bit tricky to
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:12:44PM +0100, Anton Lundin wrote:
These patches was as far as i manage to get in my delegate handling.
These ones looks ok, but the ComboBox one would be better if it saved
the string value instead of the numeric value after you clicked on it,
and you managed to
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 08:14:44PM +0100, Anton Lundin wrote:
On 27 October, 2014 - Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2014-10-24 16:48:34 +0200] Robert Helling:
what happened to Gaetan’s attempts at coming up with a UI implementation?
I wanted to do something basic and Anton convinced me that
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Jef Driesen j...@libdivecomputer.org wrote:
On 23-10-14 00:34, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Both the windows and non-libusb builds are broken.
I have no sane way to test the windows build issues. But I fixed the
non-libusb build by moving the ifdef around a bit, and I
Signed-off-by: John Van Ostrand j...@vanostrand.com
---
cochran.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cochran.c b/cochran.c
index 9e31f55..7651441 100644
--- a/cochran.c
+++ b/cochran.c
@@ -351,11 +351,13 @@ int cochran_dive_event(struct divecomputer *dc, const
unsigned char
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 5:51 PM, John Van Ostrand j...@vanostrand.com wrote:
+/* waiting for libdivecomputer patch
case 0xC2: // Low battery warning
add_event(dc, seconds, SAMPLE_EVENT_BATTERY,
Signed-off-by: John Van Ostrand j...@vanosrand.com
---
cochran.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cochran.c b/cochran.c
index 9e31f55..b3ba7b4 100644
--- a/cochran.c
+++ b/cochran.c
@@ -351,11 +351,13 @@ int cochran_dive_event(struct divecomputer *dc, const
unsigned char *s,
BTW, did you check git master…?
:-)
/D
On Oct 27, 2014, at 7:02 PM, John Van Ostrand j...@vanostrand.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: John Van Ostrand j...@vanosrand.com
---
cochran.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cochran.c b/cochran.c
index 9e31f55..b3ba7b4 100644
---
35 matches
Mail list logo
