, 2015 at 11:01:06AM +0100, Jan Darowski wrote:
1) To be honest I'm not sure where it comes from, seems like
QtDesigner chenged it...
OK, that makes sense.
2) I think this qstrdup can and should be removed... I used qstrdup
instead of strdup (they work the same) because somewhere else
wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:33:53PM +0100, Jan Darowski wrote:
I've cleaned whitespaces, removed completely qstrdump (left one
copy_string where it was needed), merged 2 later patches into one (3.
was just changing message from 2.), changed author of the commits to
match Signed-off
discovered during the implementation. And I
need to dive into the Subsurface code before starting coding to know
how to organize it and make compatible with other parts, like the case
from point 2
2015-03-25 10:07 GMT+01:00 Robert Helling hell...@atdotde.de:
Jan,
On 24.03.2015, at 21:34, Jan Darowski
Hi!
Here is my proposal for the GSoC. I believe it's the last thing from
the projects checklist so if you have any suggestions on how I could
improve it, please let me know.
Jan Darowski
subsurface.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
subsurface
asked me
at the beginning.
Are you fine with the table solution? (sorry that I didn't respond for
a while, busy time lately).
2015-03-16 8:55 GMT+01:00 Miika Turkia miika.tur...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Jan Darowski jan.darow...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ok, I can introduce changes
Hi!
Thanks for accepting me as a GSoC participant!
I hope to meet your expectations and add some useful
features to the project. It's going to be a busy and exciting summer.
Regards,
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface
in the compartment and
ambient pressure). And that's all!
As soon as my implementation will correctly read input files and
simulate gas pressures, I will link a repo so anyone could take a look
at it. I hope it will be done this weekend.
Jan Darowski
will add the basic deco.
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
but I think the result is fine.
Now I will focus on testing these deco plans, integrating with
Subsurface (ui part) and cleaning up the code. By the end of the week,
code should be ready for pull request.
--
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
.
Do you want to do this as proposed or maybe you're busy and I should do it?
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
ok.
2015-06-15 6:24 GMT+02:00 Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:25:43AM +0200, Jan Darowski wrote:
First problem from the daily build of subsurface hangs (reproducable
for me) thread solved:
in planner.c unsigned int stoplevels were compared with int depth.
Thanks
First problem from the daily build of subsurface hangs (reproducable
for me) thread solved:
in planner.c unsigned int stoplevels were compared with int depth.
Jan Darowski
From ed0d74a067e2dd33e83bc4f5c48bc453d4b1eb1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Darowski jan.darow...@gmail.com
Date: Mon
problems with reaching the first big milestone: having a basic
implementation of the algorithm on 14.06.
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
logic of the current deco algorithm. Can I add
plan_buehlmann and plan_vpmb() which will be called from the current
plan() function?
Thanks,
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi
something that can be checked / changed
easily later.
2015-05-27 21:38 GMT+02:00 Robert C. Helling hell...@atdotde.de:
On 27 May 2015, at 19:22, Jan Darowski jan.darow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jan,
The most important thing is if we want both algorithms to be
calculated for the current dive
to completely ignore this part of the
dive (the saturation increases so the first deco stop is deeper what
increases deco time but that's not connected to the gradient). I will
test this, maybe I'm missing something.
--
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
Of course, I'm working on it right now, should be ready tonight..
2015-07-03 6:09 GMT-07:00 Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 08:49:29PM +0200, Jan Darowski wrote:
Solution tested, results the same as with existing implementation.
Great.
I assume that I will get a pull
. On Friday I've rebased my changes and
prepared for merging with master.
This week I will write the promised paper about the algorithm and
maybe add Boyle's Law compensation. What also needs to be done is
optimization of some calculations.
--
Jan Darowski
much
time it will take. I will also implement Boyle's law compensation and
finish the algorithm's description. Then the great testing will come
but it will probably the next week.
--
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface
on the
results or any cases that I should test please, tell me.
--
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
reproduce this. I've checked, there are only two places setting this
variable, the only place it's used is passing it to the boyles_law().
Printing it
there gives the same value several times...
--
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface
on searching for bugs in this
code. I suppose there can be some other small issues but this one
explains a lot.
Today there will be a patch for this.
--
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org
when the first gas change during the deco is
before the first deco stop.
--
Jan Darowski
From 81a792e1209e0943b6ff848c1b54467b5066845c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Darowski jan.darow...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:20:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] VPM-B: Fix calculating Boyles compensation
against other implementations... And they differ. Yay!
--
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
the
conservatism levels already, so users can manipulate how aggressive
their schedule is.
--
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
-06-26 20:47:13 +0200)
Jan Darowski (11):
Added basic VPM-B deco algorithm settings.
Added crushing pressure state and is_vpmb parameter.
Added basic crushing pressure calculation, without
calculating current
for the VPM with the Boyles
compensation. Also missing units comments were added. (2015-08-15
15:55:46 +0200)
Jan Darowski (7):
VPM-B: Fix trial_ascent() for vpm-b. Previously, current
depth was checked, instead of the depth after
because later gradients are calculated against
this depth.
--
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
of
difference without Boyles compensation and 235 vs 289min with it on.
That's way too much.
--
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
boyle
On 15 July 2015 at 06:31, Jan Darowski jan.darow...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I've seen this link first time you sent it. Parameters are not
the problem here. We have a different tissue saturation calculation
method, so results differ a little bit at the beginning of the ascent.
So the first
I agree that these commits would make the code cleaner and easier to
understand. So if their influence on the plan is insignificant, they
should be applied.
--
Jan Darowski
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http
31 matches
Mail list logo
