Re: stuck in deco calculations

Hi, > On 20 Sep 2015, at 07:46, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > But regardless how much I stare at this, I can't see why we have entries > for 2005 and then 1996, so 33:25 and then 33:16. > > The Uemis contains a sample at 33:25, but none at 33:16. And this happens > when switching

Re: stuck in deco calculations

Hi, > On 20 Sep 2015, at 08:30, Robert Helling wrote: > > > I figured that what is special about 33:16 is that there is a sample with 0 > depth at 33:17. When I delete all 0 depth samples from the Uemis, the problem > goes away. My guess (so far unconfirmed is that some part

Re: stuck in deco calculations

On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > A silly patch like this prevents the hang, but I really want to understand > why we end up with two consecutive entries that have non-monotonous time > stamps... So we've done something slightly odd. Your XML file has

Re: stuck in deco calculations

Sorry, had an invalid address for Robert... On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:29:22PM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > So I tested the Uemis download with force and retry and a couple of > iterations of that... it all looked good. And then I accepted the download > and Subsurface hung. Attached a debugger

Re: stuck in deco calculations

Good morning,On 20 Sep 2015, at 07:29, Dirk Hohndel wrote:Robert, any comment on this?just got out of bed, before the first coffee. This patch prevents the deco calculation (which takes a lot of time) but of course does not help with the original problem. Hope to have some time