[Sugar-devel] osbuild check fails during running

2014-03-10 Thread Gaurav Parida
Hi, I want to run pep8, so I need to do osbuild check for it. On running osbuild check for it, I am getting this traceback. http://fpaste.org/83897/ I could install the library manually, should I do so? Daniel told that the dependencies are installed automatically, so what could be the reason

[Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Re: small patch for sugar-base to build on Arch

2014-03-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Looks good. These days we use github pull requests but the deprecated modules has not been moved to github. Could someone with access with sugar-base gitorious please push this? On 10 March 2014 05:08, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Re: small patch for sugar-base to build on Arch

2014-03-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Somehow I had access to the repo... so I pushed it. Thanks! On 10 March 2014 11:26, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Looks good. These days we use github pull requests but the deprecated modules has not been moved to github. Could someone with access with sugar-base gitorious

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 10 March 2014 04:41, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: Also, when building sugar, I had to manually create the directory ./out/install/etc/gconf/ or it would fail to install Can I see the output? It seems like something we

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 10 March 2014 05:10, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: It's unsupported because it's unlikely to work out-of-the-box. But if anyone wants to try it on the latest version of a distro and do the kind of analysis you have been

Re: [Sugar-devel] osbuild check fails during running

2014-03-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Download error on https://pypi.python.org/simple/: [Errno 1] _ssl.c:504: error:140770FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:unknown It's probably this https://bitbucket.org/pypa/setuptools/issue/52/ssl-errors-with-https-proxy I updated sugar-builld to use latest virtualenv which uses setuptools

[Sugar-devel] Calling async callbacks always async

2014-03-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, Code pointed out a good explanation of why we should be always calling async callbacks async in sugar-web. We have been doing it, but I was never able to produce good rationale/example for it :) http://blog.osteele.com/posts/2008/04/minimizing-code-paths-in-asychronous-code.html --

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I had to fix this for another bug, I have not tested with use_broot=false but in theory we should be always using the virtualenv python now. On 10 March 2014 01:27, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Oh interesting! osbuild is actually using a virtualenv. I suspect it doesn't work

Re: [Sugar-devel] osbuild check fails during running

2014-03-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 10 March 2014 12:06, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Download error on https://pypi.python.org/simple/: [Errno 1] _ssl.c:504: error:140770FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:unknown It's probably this https://bitbucket.org/pypa/setuptools/issue/52/ssl-errors-with-https-proxy

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2014-03-09 14:46 GMT-03:00 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: On 9 March 2014 17:53, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: Hi dear Sugar developers. We have participated in the deployment in Peru of Sugar 0.94 (classic) for XO1 and XO1.5. It will be ongoing in 2014 and hopefully

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.orgwrote: Hi dear Sugar developers. We have participated in the deployment in Peru of Sugar 0.94 (classic) for XO1 and XO1.5. It will be ongoing in 2014 and hopefully we will tighten the feedback circle and work closer

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] webaccounts panel

2014-03-10 Thread Manuel Quiñones
Much better! Some feedback: Current label is configure your web services. I think web services is better. your seems wrong person, because we use first person in other sections: about me my computer. You should highlight the icon for the selected account. In this case Facebook icon should be

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Activity startup time is in the shell.log if sugar have debug enabled. +100 on Gonzalo's recommendations. Also a couple of notes, from memory, - Gobject Introspection turned out to be slow to instantiate (IIRC, dsd

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-10 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 10/03/14 05:50, Daniel Narvaez escribió: On 10 March 2014 05:10, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org mailto:sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: It's unsupported because it's unlikely to work out-of-the-box. But if anyone

Re: [Sugar-devel] Calling async callbacks always async

2014-03-10 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2014-03-10 8:18 GMT-03:00 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: Hello, Code pointed out a good explanation of why we should be always calling async callbacks async in sugar-web. We have been doing it, but I was never able to produce good rationale/example for it :)

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.101.3 (unstable)

2014-03-10 Thread Manuel Quiñones
We recently added a Release Notes section in developer.sugarlabs.org :-) http://developer.sugarlabs.org/release-notes/102.md.html We agreed to add the deprecations notes there. 2014-03-09 21:10 GMT-03:00 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com: It didn't take me too long to pull together

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 09/03/14 12:46, Daniel Narvaez escribió: On 9 March 2014 17:53, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org mailto:sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: For us to base our work on 0.101+ (new) Sugar, we have to make sure we have solved the performance issues plaguing (new) Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
A quick note, be sure you have the last packages gobject-introspection and pygobject3 from dsd repository [1] or the patches applied to your own packages. Gonzalo [1] http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/public_rpms/f18/ On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Sebastian Silva
Thanks for the notes, do you maybe have a link to the patches that need applying? Sebastian El 10/03/14 10:30, Gonzalo Odiard escribió: A quick note, be sure you have the last packages gobject-introspection and pygobject3 from dsd repository [1] or the patches applied to your own packages.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: Thanks for the notes, do you maybe have a link to the patches that need applying? No, but the src rpms are in the same directory, and have the patches. The changes were explained by dsd in a old mail in this

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] webaccounts panel

2014-03-10 Thread Walter Bender
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: Much better! Some feedback: Current label is configure your web services. I think web services is better. your seems wrong person, because we use first person in other sections: about me my computer. +1 You

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.101.3 (unstable)

2014-03-10 Thread Walter Bender
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: We recently added a Release Notes section in developer.sugarlabs.org :-) http://developer.sugarlabs.org/release-notes/102.md.html This will be very nice for developers. Maybe less nice for our end users. Seems we will

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
This is a initial report about the use of systemtap to profile sugar http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Profile/Systemtap Gonzalo On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.orgwrote: On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote:

[Sugar-devel] Proposing review 0.102 schedule

2014-03-10 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
I want propose modify the actual schedule, to include two weeks more and allow finish the inclusion of pending features. We can add another unstable release, and preserve, the previous periods: 0.101.4 - 03/24/14 - Feature Freeze 0.101.5 - 04/24/14 - String, UI, API freeze 0.102.0 - 05/24/14 -

Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposing review 0.102 schedule

2014-03-10 Thread Walter Bender
This schedule also makes sense for the Uruguay release schedule, the other large deployment which plans to migrate to 102. -walter On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: I want propose modify the actual schedule, to include two weeks more and allow finish

Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposing review 0.102 schedule

2014-03-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 10 March 2014 22:53, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Looking at our pull request queue [1], these are: * System notifications. * Notifications for activities * Backup/restore * Journal toolbar improvements * Improvements in language selection control panel. * Color coded

Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposing review 0.102 schedule

2014-03-10 Thread Ignacio Rodríguez
Daniel, I agree. I like the post-freeze features.. If you wait to 0.104 as example Uruguay needs to wait for Color Coded Devices.. I think we need to work urgent in the list of features. I'll start asap 2014-03-10 19:50 GMT-03:00 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: On 10 March 2014 22:53,

[Sugar-devel] Logs of the #sugar irc channel

2014-03-10 Thread Gaurav Parida
Hi guys, Since, I always can't keep my computer switched on for IRC logs, I built this bot with the help of ignacio which keeps the logs of the #sugar IRC channel. It is built using python and twisted library. It is currently deployed by ignacio at

Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposing review 0.102 schedule

2014-03-10 Thread Walter Bender
Daniel, I think that what is behind this request is that there are some deployments (Australia and Uruguay) where a few weeks delay wouldn't make much difference but carrying a bunch of patches downstream for another release cycle will mean a lot of work. I don't think Gonzalo made this request