Hi,
I would like to add this enhancement to Browse activity ->
https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4394
Could anyone please guide me how to go about it?
Thanks,
Utkarsh Tiwari
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
I gather there is a lot of skepticism about Microsoft's announcement.
I was intrigued by the marketing opportunity to show potential sponsors
of deployments that they can run Sugar on their laptop as a Microsoft
program. As I understood the announcement, it should be possible to set
up a
The operative code on the school server is /usr/libexec/create_user.
What Manash describes
is apparently using the db setup by idmgr to list the registered
laptops. I don't think you will
break compatibility.
What I hope we can look at is implementing LDAP as a central
authentication for all
A more direct way to support Windows would be to use the Windows port of
the GTK toolkit.
This has been done before:
https://blogs.gnome.org/kittykat/2014/01/29/developing-gtk-3-apps-with-python-on-windows/
A GTK expert might be able to point us to the current preferred approach.
On Wed, Apr
> On April 15, 2016 at 6:56 PM Manash Raja wrote:
>
>
> @Jerry,
> I haven't modified anything for this feature on the server side. I found
> that it uses both idmgr and xs-authserver. But the 5000 port is used by
> xs-authserver to display a list of registered laptops. I
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 08:36:22AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
> On 04/16/2016 05:51 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> >Looks good. A few points on first review;
> >
> >1. you're changing "Register" and "Register again" to "Connect to
> >server", but it isn't clear in the commit message why it is
Re OwnCloud
The software is included in xsce; however, the last time I tried it was
not configured. The key in OwnCloud is configuration (db, etc.).
One concern I have is that we have a way to authenticate users. We are
growing the number of server 'services' which require a username and
On 04/16/2016 05:51 AM, James Cameron wrote:
Looks good. A few points on first review;
1. you're changing "Register" and "Register again" to "Connect to
server", but it isn't clear in the commit message why it is necessary;
Register has nothing to do with connect. The word 'connect' should
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 05:26:37AM +0530, Manash Raja wrote:
> @James,
>
> 1. you're changing "Register" and "Register again" to "Connect to
> server", but it isn't clear in the commit message why it is necessary;
>
> I felt as "Register" refers to an action done for first time (Add new
@James,
> 1. you're changing "Register" and "Register again" to "Connect to
> server", but it isn't clear in the commit message why it is necessary;
I felt as "Register" refers to an action done for first time (Add new
laptop entry in the server), while "Register again" means to redo the same
Hi, Jerry
/library/user/ refers to the directory on the school server.
Currently, the store on the school server is a metadata file and a
document file in the Journal directory per Journal object. The Log
directory contains the
metadata file for Journal objects without a document.
The
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:02:39PM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Hi, James
>
> This thread was getting long so I replied only to the most recent
> communication. I am sure you have the full thread which shows the
> scope of the discussion.
You're making it longer, yes, by hijacking it. You can
> On April 15, 2016 at 3:37 AM Tony Anderson wrote:
>
>
> Hi, Jerry
>
> I am not sure what you mean by 'remote network datastore'.
>
The objects that are not stored as part of the local journal would need to
live somewhere, you have being referring to
Hi, Jerry
I am not sure what you mean by 'remote network datastore'.
What I am doing now is looking at each Journal object. If is is new
(doesn't have Journal in the metadata - Journal showing the
item has been backed up to the school server), the script uses sftp to
upload it to
> On April 15, 2016 at 12:36 AM James Cameron wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:25:59AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
> > Hi Manash
> >
> > The registration process is awkward but not the problem.
>
> This is unfair scope creep. Manash began by asking about bug #362
Hi, James
This thread was getting long so I replied only to the most recent
communication. I am sure you have the full thread which shows the scope
of the discussion.
According to trac bug #362 was opened seven years ago against 0.82 and
last looked at three years ago. Several competent
16 matches
Mail list logo