Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Glucose 0.84 and 0.85 packaged for Debian!

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 00:32, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi all, > > As subject says, Glucose (and some of Fructose) 0.84.0 and 0.85.7 is now > packaged for Debian! > > More info at http://wiki.debian.org/Sugar and > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Debian . Wow, tomorrow will

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [support-gang] which Sugar(s) will/should run on XO's? [was: Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94]

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
done, what is still to be done, which items are owned and which are for grabs, etc. No in-depth knowledge of anything is needed, just coordinate the different efforts that are already going on and advertise the areas that need help. Regards, Tomeu > Yama > > Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > &g

Re: [Sugar-devel] gtk.Label expanding/aligning issue

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
roduces the widget hierarchy so I can play more easily with the different options. Regards, Tomeu > 2009/9/19 Tomeu Vizoso : >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 23:10, Lucian Branescu >> wrote: >>> I'm having trouble with making a gtk.Label expand to the whole screen. >

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.85.9

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, this release just removes some autogenerated files from the tarball. Thanks to Jonas Smedegaard for noticing it and to Daniel Drake for telling the solution. == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.85.9.tar.bz2 __

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 89

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 01:51, Bill Bogstad wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:17, Elena of Valhalla >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Jim Simmons wrote: >>>> [...] Fedora 11 >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [support-gang] which Sugar(s) will/should run on XO's? [was: Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94]

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
he >> coming year then we Have A Shot :) >> --A! >> >> >> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94 >> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:06:18 +0200 >> From: Tomeu Vizoso >> To: Daniel Drake >> CC: David Farning , Jim Simmons >&

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SoaS: Searching for Decision Panel volunteers.

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 22:27, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi all, > > Sebastian Dziallas has asked for clarity on how the SoaS distribution > he maintains is going to be treated and considered by SL.  It doesn't > seem that there's consensus, so we suggest forming a Decision Panel: > >   On the rare occa

[Sugar-devel] tasks for grab in F11-for-XO (was Re: Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94)

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 05:45, Bill Bogstad wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 19:45, Daniel Drake wrote: >>> 2009/9/17 David Farning : >>>> One step in that direction might be to clearly communicate and try to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.85.8

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 21:30, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:42:58PM -0400, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> * Install sugar-emulator.desktop application file #1139 > > Please do not ship autogenerated desktop file with tarball.  Noone but Tomeu > needs a f

Re: [Sugar-devel] gtk.Label expanding/aligning issue

2009-09-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 23:10, Lucian Branescu wrote: > I'm having trouble with making a gtk.Label expand to the whole screen. You mean the whole screen or the whole available space? > I've tried various combinations of box packing options, label props > and box props, no success so far. AFAICS

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-presence-service-0.85.3

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-presence-service/sugar-presence-service-0.85.3.tar.bz2 == News == * buddy colors aren't transferred when using salut #1320 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.85.8

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Attention packagers, this new file is installed in this release: /usr/share/applications/sugar-emulator.desktop Thanks, Tomeu On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 18:42, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > == Source == > > http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.85.8.tar.bz2 &g

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-toolkit-0.85.8

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.85.8.tar.bz2 == News == * Color of sugar.activity.widgets.ActivityButton is owners all time despite of 'icon-color' metadata property #1368 * Circular dependecy in ToolbarBox #1389 * ObjectChooser d

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-base-0.85.6

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-base/sugar-base-0.85.6.tar.bz2 == News == * Filtering for Audio doesn't show mp3 files #1340 * Add mimetype for Epub in sugar-base #1319 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@l

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.85.8

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.85.8.tar.bz2 == News == * ASLO knows only about stable SP releases #1369 * Sugar craches during undo for the first Keyboard component startup #1341 * favoritesview.py: icon-color KeyError #976 * python-xklavier fail

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.84 for XO-1 (was Re: Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94)

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 17:56, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/9/18 Tomeu Vizoso : >> Great, thanks for the kind offer. >> >> I think the effort is already underway, leaded by Fedora's Steven M. Parrish: >> >> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1 >> >&

[Sugar-devel] 0.84 for XO-1 (was Re: Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94)

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 16:57, Jim Simmons wrote: > Tomeu, > > You can put me down as an XO owner that is willing to try new images > and file bug reports.  I don't have any immediate plans to enhance my > three Activities so I should have time for other work. Great, thanks for the kind offer. I

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SoaS] The Future of Sugar on a Stick

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 05:38, Mel Chua wrote: > I read the multiple "future of SoaS" discussions on this mailing list > and... to be honest, I was frustrated and didn't quite know how to > respond. > > So I called my aunt Lynne May (I stay with her family when I'm in > Boston). She's been a teach

Re: [Sugar-devel] new journal and datastore maintainer

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 09:51, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:10 AM, James Cameron wrote: >> By branching at the 0.82 point as deployed, determining from evidence > > Good theoretical re-statement. You post may clarify things for other > readers -- as for me, I know very well

Re: [Sugar-devel] new journal and datastore maintainer

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:26, James Cameron wrote: > And just a question on Ivan's try/except patch that is so effective in > 0.82 in allowing a child to continue using the system with a fresh > journal ... would it be true to say that this also hides the cause of > the failure to open the journa

Re: [Sugar-devel] new journal and datastore maintainer

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:10, James Cameron wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:51:47PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> So I am strictly looking forward -- and wondering if we can help these >> users of 0.82 now. > > By branching at the 0.82 point as deployed, determining from evidence > (those

Re: [Sugar-devel] new journal and datastore maintainer

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 16:51, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Gary C Martin wrote: >> FWIW, your three major points were fixed way back by Tomeu's 0.84 data-store >> re-write to make for robustness. Actually I'm fairly sure it was these >> kind'a reports that prompted T

Re: [Sugar-devel] new journal and datastore maintainer

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:37, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Welcome new maintainer! > > I am currently doing a bit of work with LatAm deployments, so I do > have some notes related to DS. You may be aware of these issues, of > course. > >  - "Dataloss" on startup. We are hearing of some issues in the

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugaronastick.com (was Re: Beta Test of Sugar on a Stick Backup Service.)

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:15, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote: >> The only problem I see is that the same name is used to denominate a >> community project and a private initiative. These are two different >> things but not different enough to avoid confusion. >> >> I'm not talking right now abou

Re: [Sugar-devel] Jabber on the server

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/9/15 Philippe Clérié : > Is there any reason to prefer ejabberd on the server rather than another > Jabber server? I am thinking of using jabberd2 instead. > > I can't seem to wrap my head around ejabberd's configuration file but I am > quite comfortable with the xml used by jabberd2. Other t

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugaronastick.com (was Re: Beta Test of Sugar on a Stick Backup Service.)

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 00:10, Bill Bogstad wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Sorry about top posting, but I agree with most of what you said below, >> and I'm not yet particularly worried about the content of the site >> itself for now.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 19:45, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/9/17 David Farning : >> One step in that direction might be to clearly communicate and try to >> gather momentum around a series of stable releases. >> >> One thought that might work is to set .84, .88, .94, and 1.0 as stable >> releases fo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is python-xklavier a new 0.86 dependancy?

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 02:25, Gary C Martin wrote: > Hi folks, > > Just wanted to ask if python-xklavier is meant to be a new dependancy for > 0.86 and the Keyboard control panel (F11 sugar-jhbuild)? If it really is > needed shouldn't if be showing with ./sugar-jhbuild depscheck? > >        http:

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugaronastick.com (was Re: Beta Test of Sugar on a Stick Backup Service.)

2009-09-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
eb based XS > services.  My hope is that you could download the official Sugar and change > the network setting and use our services.  But I don't want to make parents > do that, I want it to be easy. Also that won't happen until at least > Blueberry because the code to connec

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 89

2009-09-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:17, Elena of Valhalla wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Jim Simmons wrote: >> [...] Fedora 11 >> with the included Sugar environment, [...] >> This does not give the child all the advantages of SoaS, but it's >> probably far from useless. > > I wonder how hard w

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94

2009-09-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 00:02, Jim Simmons wrote: > Jonas, > > As an Activity developer I want to have my stuff run well for as many > children as possible.  As an XO owner I want my XO set up as much as > possible like the XOs out in the field, so I can be sure that children > with XOs have the b

[Sugar-devel] gtk.TreeView alternatives

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Aleksey, this may be a source for ideas if we decide to drop gtk.TreeView in the Journal for 0.88: http://abock.org/2007/06/27/my-hack-week-the-new-banshee Regards, Tomeu -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the parti

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Some pics from the new GNOME Activity Journal

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, this may interest you: http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2009/09/some-pics-from-the-new-gnome-activity-journal/ We are going to meet with some of the Zeitgeist team in Bolzano later this year and we'll talk about ways to work together. Regards, Tomeu -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 18:58, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/9/16 Tomeu Vizoso : >> I cannot speak for Sebastian nor the whole SoaS community, but >> something like making SoaS an official project in SLs could go a long >> way. This would mean saying that "Sugar on a Stick&

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 18:37, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/9/16 Tomeu Vizoso : >> That's true for SoaS, Sugar and for any other FOSS project, but I >> think it's a reasonable request to ask for some explicit commitment >> from the umbrella organization, just t

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 18:20, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas : >> Now it comes to what I think is important in a project. And that is - also - >> certainty and trust. Those are pretty important factors. For developers, as >> well as for users, to know where one stands. > > Per

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 17:11, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:24, Daniel Drake  wrote: >>> >>> 2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas: >>>> >>>> Let me rephrase again, to make things clear.

[Sugar-devel] new sugar-artwork maintainer

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi all, Benjamin Berg has accepted becoming the maintainer of sugar-artwork. He is the main developer of the GTK+ theme that gives the Sugar look to our UI controls and one of the most knowledgeable people on GTK+ theming. Also, Gary has became a peer of the sugar-artwork module, where he will ke

[Sugar-devel] new journal and datastore maintainer

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, the other day I passed maintenance of the Journal and the Datastore to Aleksey, who has been doing already a great job at helping with new features, bug fixes, design discussions and all the rest of what makes a maintainer. But I would like to warn that Aleksey codes very fast and lives very

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:38, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:24, Daniel Drake wrote: >> 2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas: >>> Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an >>> "official" answer on this. Soon. >>> >>> Is the current SoaS going to be th

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:24, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas : >> Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an >> "official" answer on this. Soon. >> >> Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a >> Sugar-centric GNU/Linux dist

[Sugar-devel] sugaronastick.com (was Re: Beta Test of Sugar on a Stick Backup Service.)

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 20:04, Caroline Meeks wrote: > I'd like to announce to just the sugar development list at this point. > We are ready for the first tests of backup and restore on a Sugar Stick.  We > will be using this code for both Sugaronastick.com and the GPA but each will > point to a d

Re: [Sugar-devel] Searching for datastore entries by title

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 14:50, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On 16.09.2009, at 14:40, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 14:22, Bert Freudenberg >> wrote: >>> On 16.09.2009, at 14:11, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> >>>> Right now we onl

Re: [Sugar-devel] Searching for datastore entries by title

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 14:22, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On 16.09.2009, at 14:11, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> Right now we only index what the journal needs, see the _PREFIX_ >> constants below: >> >> >> http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar-datastore/repos/

Re: [Sugar-devel] Searching for datastore entries by title

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 14:05, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > > On 16.09.2009, at 13:48, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:09, Bert Freudenberg >> wrote: >>> >>> On 16.09.2009, at 03:11, Gary C Martin wrote: >>> >>>> H

Re: [Sugar-devel] Searching for datastore entries by title

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:09, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > > On 16.09.2009, at 03:11, Gary C Martin wrote: > >> Hi Bert, >> >> On 16 Sep 2009, at 00:51, Bert Freudenberg wrote: >> >>> I want to find a datastore entry with a specific title and mime_type. >>> But it returns *all* entries with that mim

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SoaS] The Future of Sugar on a Stick

2009-09-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/9/15 Philippe Clérié : >> >> So you probably disagreed with my statement that SoaS is not about >> installing user files to a hard drive.  Or do you mean having the Base >> OS on the drive, but the user files/activities directory on a stick? > > My use case does not require the user's environm

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Road to Sucrose 0.86 - status report (2)

2009-09-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 13:43, Simon Schampijer wrote: > > Aleksey reports: > - Latest packages for Ubuntu karmic can be tried out at: > https://launchpad.net/~alsroot/+archive/sugar-0.86, instructions are at: > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Ubuntu#Using_sugar_PPAs Is anybo

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Road to Sucrose 0.86 - status report (2)

2009-09-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 13:43, Simon Schampijer wrote: > > Check out the constant bug workflow of Gary for example. He does not > only file bugs, he follows up on questions from the developers and he > helps triaging. A good start is to follow up on the bugs you filed, see > if it is still valid,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Trac maintenance

2009-09-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 07:39, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > == Hostname change == > > Our trac instance is now reachable as bugs.sugarlabs.org.  The old > hostname dev.sugarlabs.org is not going away anytime soon, but > please update your links for consistency. > > == Plugin updates == > > I refreshe

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] The Future of Sugar on a Stick

2009-09-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:10, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> FWIW, as a (upstream) Sugar developer what I would like to see is: >> >> == Further separation between upstream and downstreams == >> >> Wit

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Karma 0.1

2009-09-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:30, Bryan Berry wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 10:26 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:42, Bryan Berry wrote: >> > >> > We are proud to release Karma version 0.1 today. Please download the >> > code and try it

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Karma 0.1

2009-09-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:42, Bryan Berry wrote: > > We are proud to release Karma version 0.1 today. Please download the > code and try it out for yourself. You can also test out the demo here. > You need Firefox 3.5 to run the demo and to tweak your display to > properly fit the XO's dimensions

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] The Future of Sugar on a Stick

2009-09-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
FWIW, as a (upstream) Sugar developer what I would like to see is: == Further separation between upstream and downstreams == Without artificially privileging nor discriminating any downstream. So a big +1 to giving a stronger identity to the SoaS project and to creating a separate mailing list.

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Fwd: #806 UNSP: Activities list view is very similar to Journal view and users delete activities instead of journal entries

2009-09-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, any comments about this user report? Thanks, Tomeu -- Forwarded message -- From: SugarLabs Bugs Date: Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 22:25 Subject: #806 UNSP: Activities list view is very similar to Journal view and users delete activities instead of journal entries To: Cc: b...@list

Re: [Sugar-devel] Soas3-200909132138 Font too large. Unable to see all of zyx-liveinstaller and gparted. _(most off terminal and unreachable)

2009-09-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 03:12, Thomas C Gilliard wrote: > I just tried Snapshot Soas3-200909132138 (and SoaS3-200909131305 ) in VM > Workstation. > > Comments: > > 1.) Fonts are much too large. I am not able to see all of the screen of > zyx-liveinstaller or gparted. (critical selections are not o

Re: [Sugar-devel] Window properties?

2009-09-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 02:52, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > When I run Etoys in a recent jhbuild, the shell does not recognize the > Etoys window. It displays a gray circle in the frame instead, and > after quitting Etoys, the launch icon is still blinking. > > I verified using "xprop" that the windo

Re: [Sugar-devel] InfoSlicer: "Error downloading... check your connection"

2009-09-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 13:02, wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to add new wikis (in French and designed for kids, such as > - http://fr.wikiversity.org/wiki/Accueil > - http://fr.vikidia.org/index.php/Accueil > - http://www.omegawiki.org/Meta:Main_Page > - http://www.omegawiki.org/OLPC_Children

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Project Guidelines posted

2009-09-12 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:34, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 03:51:55PM -0500, David Farning wrote: >> The project guidelines are now on the wiki at >> >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Project_Guidelines . >> >> Please edit as necessary.   When it looks like the editing ha

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Feature Freeze] Request for exception for Chat-66

2009-09-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 15:09, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 09/09/2009 12:01 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> == Source == >> >> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Chat/Chat-66.tar.bz2 >> >> == News == >> >> * Utilize new toolbars

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.85.7

2009-09-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.85.7.tar.bz2 == News == * Do not fail on treemodel switching #1318 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-d

Re: [Sugar-devel] How to make a SoaS (or liveCD) from scratch

2009-09-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 04:04, Martin Dengler wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 03:01:47AM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 06:43:31PM -0300, Andrés Nacelle wrote: >> > Hi guys, basically I'm trying to do a SoaS or a live CD with the image we >> > are using now on the XO, whi

[Sugar-devel] client side windows in gtk

2009-09-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, just a heads up that we may find some issues with newer versions of gtk. http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/2.17/gtk-migrating-ClientSideWindows.html Regards, Tomeu -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participan

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.85.6

2009-09-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.85.6.tar.bz2 == News == * Journal list view: jumping back to first page when popping up a palette #1235 * Do not requery if visibility wasn't changed #1250 * alt key gets stuck in favorites view #1311 * Hidden decor

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-toolkit-0.85.7

2009-09-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.85.7.tar.bz2 == News == * Palette isn't being closed after activating some kinds of subwidgets #1301 * Palette will fail to open if you have just 'scrubbed' over some number of icons quickly #1312 *

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-base-0.85.5

2009-09-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-base/sugar-base-0.85.5.tar.bz2 == News == * ObjectChooser displays USB media files, but fails to access file (datastore traceback) #1241 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar on a Stick v2 Release Naming

2009-09-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:33, Martin Dengler wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:41:31AM +0200, Sean DALY wrote: >> I'm sorry Martin, I thought I was answering > > You were but there's a lot of extra information that's sometimes hard > to parse - ultimately someone needs to put an image file in a

[Sugar-devel] bolzano 2009

2009-09-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Silbe, are you planning to attend the SugarCamp in Bolzano? http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Marketing_Team/Events/Sugarcamp_Bolzano_2009 There's going to be a Zeitgeist meeting and will be great to discuss our journal goals with them. http://live.gnome.org/ZeitgeistHackFest2009 Regards, Tomeu

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] development team meeting tomorrow at 14.00 UTC

2009-09-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, we are going to meet tomorrow to discuss this particular moment in the 0.86 release cycle, please add topics here: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Meetings#Upcoming_Meetings See you then, Tomeu -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Suga

[Sugar-devel] [Feature Freeze] Request for exception for Chat-66

2009-09-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Chat/Chat-66.tar.bz2 == News == * Utilize new toolbars design * Add new translations: mg, sq, ta ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RFA] Feature freeze break: Read

2009-09-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 20:37, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: > Hello, > Attached is the patch for making Read support the new toolbar system > (patch courtesy of Simon). While it is a bit long, most of the changes > is moving around stuff. > > Known issue: > a) The TOC combobox, the bookmark toggle and

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Feature Freeze] Request for exception for Turtle Art

2009-09-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 16:18, Walter Bender wrote: > I updated Turtle Art to use the new toolbars (thanks for all the help, > Simon) for which I would like an exception to the feature freeze. The > source tarball is: > > http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/TurtleArt/TurtleArt-64.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Feature exception request for Write toolbars (Was: Sucrose 0.85.5 Tarballs Due)

2009-09-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 18:09, Gary C Martin wrote: > On 7 Sep 2009, at 09:45, Simon Schampijer wrote: > >> * Toolbars >> As the toolbars work is not too trivial in terms of code changes you >> have to ask for a Feature Exception as well. Please send it out in time, >> that we can evaluate it. Crite

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Differentiate open tabs

2009-09-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 00:37, Simon Schampijer wrote: > Hi, > > we have an issue with our current tabs design (Browse and Terminal). It is > impossible to differentiate two open tabs - to find out which is the current > active one. This works for more then two, but is not ideal imho. Is the screen

Re: [Sugar-devel] [project ideas] - port of sugar to pyjamas.

2009-09-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 00:09, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > folks, hi, > yesterday i thought i'd investigate doing a port of sugar to > pyjamas[-desktop].  reading around i saw the project ideas page, and > filled in a section: > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Project_Ideas#P

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Read toolbar - not enough space for TOC on little dimensions

2009-09-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 15:09, Simon Schampijer wrote: > Hi, > > with the new toolbar design I have the issue of 'loosing' the some widgets, > with smaller dimensions (800x600). > > Any ideas on how we could rearrange that? Putting it in a secondary toolbar? > Other ideas? I think we should use onl

Re: [Sugar-devel] #1296 UNSP: close collaboration tube after the activity window is destroyed

2009-09-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, could some activity author who has worked on collaboration give a look to this patch and comment on its consequences? Thanks, Tomeu On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 13:17, SugarLabs Bugs wrote: > #1296: close collaboration tube after the activity window is destroyed >

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Fwd: #292 NORM: add more details to the object palette in the journal

2009-09-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, anyone wants to specify the design for this? Thanks, Tomeu -- Forwarded message -- From: SugarLabs Bugs Date: Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:31 Subject: #292 NORM: add more details to the object palette in the journal To: Cc: b...@lists.sugarlabs.org #292: add more details to the

Re: [Sugar-devel] #1259: [Bug 422701] Journal blocks popups in F12 alpha, cannot log off : Update to metacity (i686 2.27.0.9.fc12 rawhide) fixes it

2009-09-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 06:10, Thomas C Gilliard wrote: > #1259: Journal blocks popups in F12 alpha, cannot log off > --+- >    Reporter:  sdz                        |          Owner:  tomeu >        Type:  defect              

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem rejoining a shared Write

2009-09-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 19:28, J.M. Maurer wrote: > Ola Tomeu, > >> > Now a "ListTubes"[1] call on the existing tube channel will return >> no >> > tubes in the callback. Why is that? >> > >> > It's especially weird since it WILL return a tube when you fire up >> > another jhbuild/XO and join that s

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem installing and running hulahop on ubuntu 8.10

2009-09-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 21:22, vijit singh wrote: > Hello Tomeu, > > >> >> It is a warning, but I don't see why you think it isn't related to the >> exception. > > I might be missing some point or might be unable to interpret this warning > properly. >> >> Removing 2.4 is not enough, you need to reb

Re: [Sugar-devel] minutes of today's meeting

2009-09-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 01:57, Gary C Martin wrote: > On 1 Sep 2009, at 19:50, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 20:49, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> we had an excellent discussion in today's meeting, pity we ran ou

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal Listview (gtk.treeview)

2009-09-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 18:18, Gary C Martin wrote: > On 18 Aug 2009, at 09:17, Simon Schampijer wrote: > >> with the current switch to use gtk.TreeView in the Journal list view >> I came across: >> >> a) patch to remove the column headers, with removing of the clickable >> >> b) issues: >> - when s

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem rejoining a shared Write

2009-09-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 23:19, J.M. Maurer wrote: > For the collaboration people: > > I added some code to AbiCollab to let a collaborative Write session > continue when the session initiator disconnects. However, I seem to have > a problem rejoining an activity. This is what I do: > > 1. Start Writ

Re: [Sugar-devel] Remove the naming alert in 0.86

2009-09-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 13:46, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> I also think that improving the default texts will improve greatly >> this issue. Anybody wants to tackle it? Maybe for a reduced number of >> activities at first? > > Ah, but what shoul

Re: [Sugar-devel] Remove the naming alert in 0.86

2009-09-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 00:05, Bill Bogstad wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Bastien wrote: >> "Art Hunkins" writes: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> I think the alerts are a pain and an unwelcome interruption of a train of >>> thought. Almost as much of a pain as Windows popups. >> >> +1 >> >> Or maybe m

Re: [Sugar-devel] Request Feature Freeze Exception for ticket #916 to allow sugar on non-xo hardware to register with a schoolserver

2009-09-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 00:00, Bill Bogstad wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Hamilton Chua wrote: >> Hello Bill, >> >>> If my vote counts, I'll +1 as well.  In the XO case, it should work >>> the same as before.  In the non-XO, it tries to do something useful >>> rather then nothing. >> >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem installing and running hulahop on ubuntu 8.10

2009-09-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 23:37, vijit singh wrote: > Hi Tomeu, > > >> >> # >> /var/lib/python-support/python2.5/xpcom/xpt.py:72: RuntimeWarning: >> tp_compare didn't return -1 or -2 for exception >> >> I think this is due to some python C modules being compiled with a >> python version and others wit

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem installing and running hulahop on ubuntu 8.10

2009-09-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 19:15, vijit singh wrote: > Hi Tomeu, > > Thanx for replying. > > >> >> You still get this error if you run this? >> >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.6 python -c "import hulahop" > > Well, running this command was still giving errors, I mean it didn't started > the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem installing and running hulahop on ubuntu 8.10

2009-09-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 18:45, vijit singh wrote: > Hello all, > > I am facing problem in installing and running hulahop on ubuntu 8.10. Here > are the steps taken- > > 1. Firstly, I build the req xulrunner and xpcom libraries, though xulrunner > was already installed by default, anyways it was upgr

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS and VideoChat activity not working

2009-09-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
sk of activity maintenance. > > 2009/9/4 Tomeu Vizoso >> >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 16:44, Walter Bender >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Andrés >> > Nacelle wrote: >> >> Hi guys, I have some doubts and some results to share with, from so

Re: [Sugar-devel] Request Feature Freeze Exception for ticket #916 to allow sugar on non-xo hardware to register with a schoolserver

2009-09-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 17:24, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 09/04/2009 10:16 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 16:36, Tomeu Vizoso  wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 13:23, Hamilton Chua >>>  wrote: >>>> >>>>

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS and VideoChat activity not working

2009-09-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 16:44, Walter Bender wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Andrés > Nacelle wrote: >> Hi guys, I have some doubts and some results to share with, from some tests >> I been running so I'll be writing them one at a time. >> >> >> Lets start by one kind of simple, has anyone

Re: [Sugar-devel] Request Feature Freeze Exception for ticket #916 to allow sugar on non-xo hardware to register with a schoolserver

2009-09-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 16:36, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 13:23, Hamilton Chua wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like to kindly request for an exception to the feature freeze >> currently in place to allow the inclusion of a patch that will enable sug

Re: [Sugar-devel] Smile activity version 1

2009-09-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 18:31, Tony Anderson wrote: > I posted version 1 of the Smile activity to activities.sugarlabs.org. It > matches the code posted on gitorious. > > The Smile activity implements the open source Ambulant SMIL3 player. It > plays a variety of media types. More importantly it can

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.85.5

2009-09-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.85.5.tar.bz2 == News == * Linux-specific terminology in Removable Storage context menu. #632 * Sugar crash when stopping inactive Etoys #571 * add star badge to APs that are in our connections #19 * Let user upgrade

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-toolkit-0.85.6

2009-09-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.85.6.tar.bz2 == News == * Sugar crash when stopping inactive Etoys #571 * Journal showing in frame as default grey circle #1251 * Sugar crashing when saving a journal entry upon closing an activity #

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-base-0.85.4

2009-09-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-base/sugar-base-0.85.4.tar.bz2 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] minutes of today's meeting

2009-09-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 20:49, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi, > > we had an excellent discussion in today's meeting, pity we ran out of > time. Here you can find the logs and minutes: > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Meetings#Tuesday_1st_September_2009_16:00_UTC

[Sugar-devel] minutes of today's meeting

2009-09-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, we had an excellent discussion in today's meeting, pity we ran out of time. Here you can find the logs and minutes: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Meetings#Tuesday_1st_September_2009_16:00_UTC We have already two interesting subjects for the next meeting: extensions, engineeri

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >