Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue tracking on Github?

On 06/06/2016 07:08 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > First, I think there must be a large fraction of all github repos that > have less than 10 commits with almost nothing in them and are > essentially worthless. If those don't have a LICENSE file, I don't > mind :) I think this way of looking at the

[Sugar-devel] Thank you for your efforts!

Hi All, I just want to say thank you to everyone on this list for all your efforts! :-) There are certainly many behind the scenes components that make up "Sugar Labs". Cheers! Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlab

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue tracking on Github?

ect, so I do think it would be important (for someone) to look into and not trust this one figure completely. Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue tracking on Github?

(This is long, gnarly thread, but I just like to think about this sort of stuff, what can I say...) On 05/27/2016 09:05 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > This has been the topic of a lot of discussion on the FOSS foundation list > of late. I think there is a movement afoot to push them towards a default

Re: [Sugar-devel] fun with fonts

On 06/24/2016 04:54 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > Taking inspiration from the GSoC Font Editor project, I wrote a Glyph > editor in Turtle Blocks. > Cool! > > [1] http://github.com/walterbender/turtle-font-script > [2] http://walterbender.github.io/turtleblocksjs/?file=fonteditor.tb That is a great

[Sugar-devel] Music Blocks | Interesting code from Google that would be helpful for widgets

nd of integration with solfege, but not one of the widgets I designed and IMHO not a priority (but will put here anyway for the record) https://musiclab.chromeexperiments.com/Arpeggios -- Devin Ulibarri www.devinulibarri.com/Bio.html ___ Sugar-

Re: [Sugar-devel] Music Blocks | Interesting code from Google that would be helpful for widgets

On 03/10/2016 12:01 PM, Devin wrote: > This email is for those interested in the widget GSoC '16 project. > > Hi, > > Check this out: > > https://musiclab.chromeexperiments.com/Experiments Source Code is available HERE: https://github.com/googlecreativ

Re: [Sugar-devel] Music widgets basic implementation patch

I will test soon. Below is reply re: export to blocks On 03/12/2016 03:17 PM, yoshita arora wrote: > I have made a basic implementation of Rhythm Rulers as you suggested in the > last mail, i.e, I have made a simple UI of Rhythm Rulers with the > dissection functionality. Yoshita's code is

Re: [Sugar-devel] Music widgets basic implementation patch

On 03/12/2016 09:13 PM, Devin wrote: > I will test soon. Below is reply re: export to blocks Please help me out. I tested your repo, but cannot understand where I am to find the rhythm ruler. How do I use it? Where should I click to find it? (please always remember that I am not liter

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue tracking on Github?

n/* be preferable to GitHub? If so, I can send out an email to see if volunteers are available to take to such a task. I need to do something similar for another project--helping Harvard's MOOC use free/libre software instead of proprietary Adobe Connect. Thanks, Devin

[Sugar-devel] Minutes from Today's Meeting (7-15-2016)

Hi, Here are the minutes from today's meeting: http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2016-07-15T12:26:15.html It was fun! Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSOC 2017 - Going Beyond Equal Temperament in Music Blocks

/harmony.tb (a slightly different version also attached) Please open it in Music Blocks, run it, and study it. Thanks! Devin Sachithra Dangalla: > Hi, > > I'm interested in the project *Going Beyond Equal Temperament in Music > Blocks*. I would like to know more informati

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] meeting reminder

On 09/01/2016 02:25 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > Election 2016 (for three SLOB positions); At any point, now or in the future, does it make sense (from Sugar Labs' point of view) for me to run for one of these positions? If so, I will think about it. Thanks, De

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] meeting reminder

Hi, Okay, I will go for it. You can have me run this time, if possible. See you tomorrow at 3 p.m. Devin On 09/01/2016 04:44 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > I would encourage you to run -- you have a unique perspective -- that of > educator and developer -- which would add value to our discu

[Sugar-devel] GCI Poster for 2016

) Thanks! Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2017 proposal

Hi, Some helpful materials for those interested in the MB Manual and the MB Timbre Widget: https://owncloud.libretools.com/index.php/s/kslQFDb0Bbs8HQk (available until May 31st) Devin Melnita Dabre: > Dear Sir/Ma'am, > > The User Manual for Music Blocks project Idea for GSoC 2017

Re: [Sugar-devel] Libreplanet talk in an hour

Hi, >From the FSF: > Following O'Brien in the "Freedom" room of the conference were Devin Ulibarri > and Walter Bender of Sugar Labs, who gave an overview of the project's > developers, teachers, and students coming together to work on educational > free softwa

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Oversight Board - Update

Hi All, The board meets today (9/2) at 20:00 UTC on Jitsi. Our current agenda is https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2020-09-02 As always, please let us know if you would like to join these meetings. Devin On 2020-08-18 15:06, devin@ulibarri.website wrote: Hi All

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Oversight Board - Update

Hi, Our meeting minutes are up at https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2020-09-02 We plan to meet in two weeks on Weds 9/16 at 20:00 UTC on Jitsi. Devin On 2020-09-02 13:57, devin@ulibarri.website wrote: Hi All, The board meets today (9/2) at 20:00 UTC on Jitsi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gradual reorganizing of Music Blocks codebase

@Anindya, I defer to Walter Bender as he is the project lead for this Sugar Labs project. That being said, everything you propose sounds great and I trust you have the technical ability given all the great work you did over the summer. If we do end up refactoring, I am happy to test anything out

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Music Blocks v3.3

, and Devin.) enjoy. -walter [1] https://github.com/sugarlabs/musicblocks/releases/tag/v3.3 -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org <http://www.sugarlabs.org> ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) i...@lists.sugarla

[Sugar-devel] Reminder: SLOBs Meeting Today 20:00 UTC

...@lists.sugarlabs.org and request the link. Best, Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Oversight Board - Update

-05T20:12:25.html and https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2020-08-05 (We met on IRC that week) Devin devin@ulibarri.website: Hi All, Just a reminder that, as planned, we are meeting this July 20th at 20:00 UTC. The prior meeting's minutes are published here: https

[Sugar-devel] Reminder: SLOBs Meeting Today 20:00 UTC

...@lists.sugarlabs.org and request the link. Best, Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Reminder: SLOBs Meeting Today 20:00 UTC

...@lists.sugarlabs.org and request the link. Special Note: We plan to end early at around 20:30 UTC to discuss 1023 filing and bylaws with the Sugar Labs Inc. lawyer. Best, Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http

Re: [Sugar-devel] Music Blocks in the Playstore

Thanks Favour!!! I posted on my blog at https://musicblocks.net/2020/07/21/music-blocks-is-now-available-in-google-play/ Also, Favour, perhaps you can put on f-droid as well? https://f-droid.org/ MB should fit their profile. On 2020-07-21 09:10, Jaskirat Singh wrote: Great to hear that.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Oversight Board - Update

something to add to the agenda, likewise, please let us know. Best, Devin James Cameron: Your oversight board meets every two weeks. The next meeting is 8th July, 20:00 UTC. If you would like the board to discuss something, you may either; * write to sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] 2020-07-22 Meeting Minutes

will be on Jitsi. Please let us know in advance if you would like to join. Best, Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] 2020-07-22 Meeting Minutes

devin@ulibarri.website: Our next meeting is planned for 2020-08-05 at 20:00 UTC on IRC The agenda is published at https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2020-08-05 Meeting to start in just a few minutes on IRC. #sugar-meeting on freenode Devin

[Sugar-devel] 2020-07-22 Meeting Minutes

-05 at 20:00 UTC on IRC The agenda is published at https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2020-08-05 == Minutes for SLOBs Meeting == 2020-07-22 at 20:00 UTC Attendance: Devin, Lionel, Ibiam, James, Walter, Samson (Alex excused himself beforehand.) === Vote on Prior

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] 2020-07-22 Meeting Minutes

On 2020-07-22 23:58, Rahul Bothra wrote: Thanks Devin. Added myself to list of attendees Sorry about that. Thanks for reading it over. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [IAEP] Oversight Board - Update

on a regular basis. Devin devin@ulibarri.website: Hi All, Just a reminder that, as planned, we are meeting this July 20th at 20:00 UTC. The prior meeting's minutes are published here: https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2020-07-08 (but have yet to be voted

[Sugar-devel] Today's Minutes and Next Meeting Time

ou a link in advance. Please send your request to sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org As for today's meeting minutes, they are up at: https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2020-12-09 Best, Devin Links: -- [1] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Overs

[Sugar-devel] Reminder: SLOBs Meeting Today 20:00 UTC

Inc. Officers. As always, if any community members would like to join and do not already know the link for the meeting, please reply to sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org and request the link. Best, Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] Reminder: SLOBs Meeting Today 20:00 UTC

My previous message reads like Claudia's term has ended, which it has not. Apologies. ...and thank you all once more! On 2020-11-18 17:01, devin@ulibarri.website wrote: Hi, And thank you to those who have served on their board whose term has ended. Thank you, James, Claudia, and Rahul

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] Reminder: SLOBs Meeting Today 20:00 UTC

is...) Thank you, thank you, thank you! Devin On 2020-11-13 01:47, Favour Kelvin wrote: Welcome to the new members on board :) On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, 17:18 Claudia Urrea, wrote: Apologies for having missed the meeting yesterday. I had a medical appointment, which took longer than expected

Re: [Sugar-devel] Reminder: SLOBs Meeting Today 20:00 UTC

Hi All, This is the latest bylaws which impacts all members and board of directors. As everyone has had sufficient time to review the last draft and this is only slightly modified, I plan to give the lawyer the green light tomorrow morning. Thank you all! Best, Devin On 2020-10-28 14:53

Re: [Sugar-devel] Second Call for Candidacies Sugar Labs Oversight Board Elections 2020-2022

deadline is on the 4th of November, 2020. Devin On 2020-11-04 11:06, Martin Guy wrote: Re: oversight board, I would be happy to apply since I gather that achieving a quorum has been an obstacle to its effectiveness, but I feel too new to Sugar and its community to know the ins and outs of Sugar Labs

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Reminder: SLOBs Meeting Today 20:00 UTC

it. At any rate, good catch! Devin On 2020-11-03 18:38, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: Thanks Devin; some comments. "Composition and Meetings. The Corporation shall have an Advisory Board whose members shall be appointed by corporate sponsors who pay annual fee to be determined by the Board of Dire

Re: [Sugar-devel] Reminder: SLOBs Meeting Today 20:00 UTC

Hi All, If you would like to look over a draft of the bylaws for a future Sugarlabs Inc. and can make it at 20:00 UTC today (SLOB's usual time, every other Weds), please reply. Devin On 2020-10-14 10:45, devin@ulibarri.website wrote: Hi All, Just a friendly reminder that today is the next

Re: [Sugar-devel] Reminder: SLOBs Meeting Today 20:00 UTC

Attached is current draft. It was drafted from the SugarLabs Wiki by Aaron Williamson, Sugar Labs Inc.'s lawyer. (https://www.akwlc.com/) (sending this separately as sometimes mailing lists send attachments later) On 2020-10-28 14:52, devin@ulibarri.website wrote: Hi All, If you would like

[Sugar-devel] Music Blocks Development and Music Blocks Users Channels on Matrix

/#/!TQlGQdCOIbjZmCHair:matrix.org?via=matrix.org #music-blocks:matrix.org Hope to speak to you there! Best, Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Music Blocks Block Graphics Refactoring proposal for GSOC

I would imagine that using Blockly could help us focus our efforts on the core musical functions of Music Blocks. Walter, maybe you could specify the main design decisions you would like to revisit, so research can be done ahead of deciding whether or not to use Blockly? I am looking

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SLOB meeting reminder

ly for NPO status. As for receipts, Alex Perez should have access to those. (I never received them myself). I am sorry you are having a bad experience. Thanks for your help thus far. Devin On 2021-02-17 10:46, Martin Guy wrote: OK, I thought I'd make this official, hoping that someone may be a

[Sugar-devel] Donations to SugarLabs

send this email for the broader, long-term benefit, and general awareness.) Best, Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Help with Music Blocks Wikipedia Page?

admission into Wikipedia. Lastly, if anyone is familiar with other articles that have been written about Music Blocks, referencing those would be helpful. Thank you, Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with Music Blocks Wikipedia Page?

admission into Wikipedia. Lastly, if anyone is familiar with other articles that have been written about Music Blocks, referencing those would be helpful. Thank you, Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with Music Blocks Wikipedia Page?

them to my draft and just cross my fingers that these reviewers will approve of it. At any rate, glad I found these! Devin On 2021-12-30 08:34, devin@ulibarri.website wrote: Hi, Thanks. Walter, that article is helpful because it is 3rd party, but is probably not sufficiently substantial. @All

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with Music Blocks Wikipedia Page?

g research on programming languages for kids would benefit to such a reference on Wikipedia. Thanks in advanced! Best, Devin On 2021-12-29 20:29, Walter Bender wrote: Here is one reference to Music Blocks in Peru: https://www.gob.pe/institucion/minedu/noticias/419064-tablets-para-aprendo-en-c

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue tracking on Github?

th GitHub is it allows developers to upload code without a license (thus being proprietary by default, even though we can all see the code). As a start, I think we should push on GitHub to discourage this practice. Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Su

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue tracking on Github?

(I found this in my drafts folder and am sending it out. I know a decision was made about this, but am sending for continued reference.) On 05/16/2016 11:13 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > Hi > > Does anyone want to discuss any more objections with me, or can I > migrate the issue tracking to Github

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue tracking on Github?

On 05/27/2016 11:16 AM, Devin Ulibarri wrote: > Having no license, if someone accidentally downloads and uses the code > without express permission, since the default US copyright law would > have it "All Rights Reserved" it puts the people who have access to the > co

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue tracking on Github?

On 05/27/2016 09:03 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: > > On 27 May 2016 at 08:59, Devin Ulibarri <devin@ulibarri.website > <mailto:devin@ulibarri.website>> wrote: > > Notice from the ethics article that one big deal with GitHub is it > allows developers to uploa

Re: [Sugar-devel] Music widgets basic implementation patch

because what we are creating is innovative, and therefore takes teamwork to implement. Thank you! Devin -- Devin Ulibarri www.devinulibarri.com/Bio ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] What is the "free pitch slider" widget? [Music Blocks GSoC]

Direct link to packaged source code (same code that I am running on my phone that gave me the idea initially): https://f-droid.org/repo/eu.flatworld.android.slider_3_src.tar.gz On 03/24/2016 09:50 AM, Devin Ulibarri wrote: > Hi, > > Many are asking what is the "free pitch

[Sugar-devel] What is the "free pitch slider" widget? [Music Blocks GSoC]

oid-slider/source (upstream code is non-free and probably not available, but the basic functionality should be available and free to study) The difference is that the user will need a way to 1) choose pitches they like and 2) export those to main music blocks code. Hope this he

[Sugar-devel] For GSoC interested in "Music Blocks Challenges"

Hi, Someone outside of this list asked where they might start for the "Music Blocks Challenges" for GSoC. This is the short of my reply. > > The project description on the ideas page > mentions that > there is a Music Blocks activity which

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2016-03-25

to being adopted, e.g., Devin, a music teacher, > has adopted me). We need to make our voices heard. I do not know "who adopted who". I have been telling everyone it is a "collaboration" to suggest that we are on equal footing. Yes, I am music teacher. I found out about So

Re: [Sugar-devel] What is the "free pitch slider" widget? [Music Blocks GSoC]

On 03/24/2016 05:47 PM, Yash Khandelwal wrote: > How do you run the packaged source code on mobile? APK is here: https://f-droid.org/repo/eu.flatworld.android.slider_3.apk ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] Answer to Question RE: Music Blocks' Rhythm Rulers Widget

A student has asked: > Could you please elaborate what you mean by "generating the Rhythm > block that is in the matrix palette to produce the resultant sound". A > Rhythm block takes "the no. of notes" and "the note value" as > arguments to generate the corresponding "rhythm blocks in the pitch

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSOC 2016

of the rulers and dissection functionality (click and prompt a number for division) b) start with a back-end of audio playback and blocks export. I hope this helps a little. The main design picture is the file "rhythm-ruler-design.jpg" Also, understand know next to

[Sugar-devel] want to contribute in Music Blocks and Widgets Ideas

://owncloud.libretools.com/index.php/s/gTYvM1Iyc92lVWG Pitch Stairs -- See the staris folder from the above. ...that should get you started. I will send more later. Devin On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 12:27 -0500, Walter Bender wrote: From: Raghav Mittal <raghavmittal...@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, Ma

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue tracking on Github?

ontributing to the advancement of software libre tools for the entire community (even if we are just filing bug reports, etc). My two cents, Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue tracking on Github?

river firmware software, nor software project > hosting software. Just like we would appreciate it if people used Sugar software and sent in bug reports when they ran into problems, I know that developers of server-side libre git solutions would appreciate having more members of the community tr

Re: [Sugar-devel] facebook verification

On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 08:06 +1000, Sam P. wrote: > But you just posted the twitter password on the public, archived, > sugar-devel mailing list. Please reset the password. Question: On these group mailings (this is "mailman", I think) is there a way to make an automatic header/footer appended to

Re: [Sugar-devel] SL GSoC proposal text

Utkarsh Tiwari: > I think we need to correct the answer to this question - "If your org > has applied for GSoC but not been selected, select the year". > > Shouldn't we mention only those years in which we were not selected? I think that what was sent to us was a copy/paste of original

Re: [Sugar-devel] Google Summer of Code 2017

Walter Bender: > Anyone interested in either being a > mentor or an administrator? I am interested in being a mentor. I probably will not have time for administrator this summer. My goal is to finish the summer with a completely functional, stable (and fun, of course) Music Blocks, which I

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2017

Dear wonderful SLOB members, Please approve of the motions for Sugar's participation in GSoC. Thanks! Devin Dave Crossland: > I can't imagine any objections - GCI and GSOC seem to be a key input to the > project :) > > > > ___ >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Interested in contributing to Sugar Labs

ave plenty of bugs! :) Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] (no subject)

On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 12:33 +0100, adwumi ogunbiyi wrote: > > On Feb 24, 2017 12:22, "adwumi ogunbiyi" <adwumiogunb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > Hello my name is ibraheem ogunbiyi Pleased to meet you. I am Devin and I help out with the Music Blocks (www.musicblo

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] Outreachy

> place in Boston’s communities Maybe something here, too. http://www.massculturalcouncil.org/programs/programs.asp Keep on the radar for the future: https://bostonculturalcouncil.com/ Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Call for Testers/Bug-Reporters/Patcher-uppers: Music Blocks v1 Testing to Begin

ease create a copy and rename it with your name and which section you are currently working on and upload it to this folder frequently. Feel free to add pictures and .tb files as well and organize the folder however you like by adding other folders. Thanks! Devin ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] Outreachy project participation

creating some music with MB. Best, Devin On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 21:38 +0530, soumya vadlamannati wrote: > Hello everyone, > I am a computer science student of International Institute of > Information Technology, Hyderabad, India. I am interested in > participating in Outreachy this ye

Re: [Sugar-devel] New activity

. Just a thought... one of many. Devin Walter Bender: > Mastermind would be great!!! > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Tony Anderson <tony_ander...@usa.net> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Tetris already has an excellent tetris activity - block party. I would

Re: [Sugar-devel] Newcomer - need mentor for contribution

ode is here: https://github.com/walterbender/musicblocks You can try Music Blocks at https://play.musicblocks.net Also, WE CURRENTLY RECOMMEND FIREFOX, because of a bug with Chrome/ium. Are you GCI student? Or college? Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Su

Re: [Sugar-devel] New activity

Tony Anderson: > Naturally, a concern with Mario Bros. is that it is proprietary. I did not mean to say that they work on Mario Bros. They could hack on SuperTux. It is both familiar and different. https://supertuxproject.org/download.html > Generally, side scrollers are easier to implement >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Outreachy - Going Beyond Equal Temperament in Music Blocks

ise tuning of those notes, and thus the relationship of the tuning of those notes with each other. For example, if the tuning in Hz of E is changed, the relationship between C and E changes too... thus affecting the sound. So, with different temperaments, the same mod

Re: [Sugar-devel] Outreachy - Going Beyond Equal Temperament in Music Blocks

On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 14:31 -0400, Walter Bender wrote: > That seems like the correct approach to me in terms of the internals. > The tricky bits then come into play when we start applying different > types of transformations, such as adding half-steps, generating > intervals, etc. Plus, there may

Re: [Sugar-devel] Outreachy - Going Beyond Equal Temperament in Music Blocks

On Sun, 2017-03-26 at 16:46 +0530, Sachithra Dangalla wrote: > After mapping the frequencies, the next focus has to be on > transformations such as adding half-steps, intervals and mode - as > Walter said on a previous mail. But I still have a lot to figure out > about them. Or will they be

Re: [Sugar-devel] Outreachy - Going Beyond Equal Temperament in Music Blocks

On Sat, 2017-03-25 at 20:48 +0530, Sachithra Dangalla wrote: > I wonder if it cannot be a bit more simple in that you could > define the number of steps in a key/mode by simply the number > of define frequency blocks in the clamp? and maybe you don't > need to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Outreachy - Going Beyond Equal Temperament in Music Blocks

On Sat, 2017-03-25 at 14:28 +0530, Sachithra Dangalla wrote: > I came up with the following simple activity diagram(attachment 1) to > capture what happens when the user defines a temperament. By > incorporating the comments and Devin's mockups in the GitHub issue[1] > I came up with a mockup

Re: [Sugar-devel] Outreachy - Going Beyond Equal Temperament in Music Blocks

On Sat, 2017-03-25 at 14:06 -0400, Walter Bender wrote: > (Question for Devin: What naming convention do we use if there are > more than 12 half-steps? Do you mean "by default"? > I guess we just use pitch number?) Pitch Number is a good option to have (that is why I reco

Re: [Sugar-devel] Outreachy - Going Beyond Equal Temperament in Music Blocks

On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 00:36 +0530, Sachithra Dangalla wrote: > I went through some of the temperaments available in order to get an > idea about the types of temperaments that can be added to Music > Blocks. According to [1] the temperaments that could be added are: > 1. Equal

[Sugar-devel] Proposals: MusicBlocks (Outreachy and GSoC)

not have access to power. Thank you, Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] 2017 Goals for Sugar Labs

Walter Bender: > * Stand-alone projects such as Music Blocks have merit as long as they > maintain both a degree of connection with Sugar and promote the values of > the community. It is not certain that these projects will lead users > towards Sugar, but they do promote FOSS and Constructionist

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2017 proposal

e idea that uses other tools, that is fine. However, any libraries you use must be free/libre (AKA open source). Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2017 proposal

t. Prior contributions? You can start by seeing if there is any outstanding issues you might fix as your contribution. https://github.com/walterbender/musicblocks/issues/ Do you have projects that you are currently contributing to? Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing l

Re: [Sugar-devel] Outreachy - Going Beyond Equal Temperament in Music Blocks

On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 15:48 +0530, Sachithra Dangalla wrote: > When applying to Outreachy, is submitting an application through > Outreachy application process sufficient? For GSOC Sugar Labs have a > proposal template but there is no such template for Outreachy is it? > (Apart from the

[Sugar-devel] Call for Testers/Bug-Reporters/Patcher-uppers: Music Blocks v1 Testing to Begin

right now is to have a stable Music Blocks for a version 1 release. Thank you! Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Outreachy - Going Beyond Equal Temperament in Music Blocks

Sachithra Dangalla: > Just to be clear, is it something like this? I think that is correct. Walter? ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Outreachy - Going Beyond Equal Temperament in Music Blocks

eater than -1. Is that so? I mean that -1 is a lower pitch than 0. These numbers represent /pitch contour/ (having trouble finding a good reference on the Internet, but the basic idea is to abstract pitches to just higher and lower and assign them integers) Does this make sense? Devin ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs 2017-2019 Oversight Board Election Results

Hi, I did not understand the voting system either. I was expecting a message to tell us when and where (and maybe even how) to vote. At any rate, I wish us all success. Devin Thomas Gilliard: > I never got an invitation to vote here. : / > > satellit > > thomas gilliard >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs 2017-2019 Oversight Board Election Results

for the case: https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Governance Devin Laura Vargas: > Thomas, > > The ballot should have arrived to your inbox on October 3, 2017. > > Please double check and report cc Samson Goddy if you didn't get the > ballot at all. > > > Rega

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs 2017-2019 Oversight Board Election Results

Samson Goddy: > c...@cs.cornell.edu and samsongo...@gmail.com. but it is more likely to be > the first email. Nothing from either of those emails on my end, BTW. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs 2017-2019 Oversight Board Election Results

James Cameron: > I've checked, and both Devin and Thomas are on the list of members. > > The ballot was sent by mail. > > We should all know that mail is unreliable because of spam filtering. It is not in my spam. > Mail about how to vote was posted to iaep@ mailing list.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs 2017-2019 Oversight Board Election Results

Samson Goddy: > Sorry, if you didn't get any ballot. But i am unsure what went wrong > because i am certain all mails was sent. I do not see it in inbox or spam... > But my question is, why am i hearing this now? you should have complained > and i will work with you to figured out what happened.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs 2017-2019 Oversight Board Election Results

James Cameron: > Thanks, but it doesn't have to be in your spam folder for it to have > been filtered. Filtering happens at multiple points, not only your > mail hosting provider. My guess is that it was filtered before > reaching your provider. Thanks for the tip. My "provider" is the server

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Claudia Urrea

Welcome! Devin Samson Goddy: > Welcome Claudia!! > > On Dec 2, 2017 11:11 PM, "Walter Bender" <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am very please to be able to announce that, by a unanimous decision, >> Claudia Urrea has been appointed to fill the Su

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [IAEP] [SLOB] workshop travel motion

Hello, Adam, yes I will report in the form of blogposts to musicblocks.net Thank you all! Devin On 2018 1 8 20:32:58 UTC, Adam Holt <h...@laptop.org> wrote: >+1 if it's clarified where public community reporting will take place, >e.g. >in the form of blog post(s) @ https://

[Sugar-devel] For those interested in helping with Music Blocks | Goals and Timeline

. :) Thank you! Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

  1   2   >