On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 8:31 PM James Cameron wrote:
> Over the past few days, we've had more discussion in Gitter than IRC.
>
> We still have Thomas (satellit) in IRC.
>
I'll deal with wherever(s).
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.netrek.org/
>
Over the past few days, we've had more discussion in Gitter than IRC.
We still have Thomas (satellit) in IRC.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, 11:12 PM Rahul Bothra My idea was to see how many people are willing
> to move to Gitter, and if it be helpful for new contributors.
> I've observed this to the only criteria in my recent (radical)
> decisions and they've mostly been poorly thought out,
> for us as an
Thanks James and Alex, I've reviewed all comments and suggestions.
For most of the suggestions, I found no alternate but to use IRC. My
idea was to see how many people are willing to move to Gitter, and if
it be helpful for new contributors.
I've observed this to the only criteria in my recent
As an oversight board member, for all the same reasons cited below, I am
100% _not_ in favor of this proposal. It's a crude attempt at
re-implementing IRC, and despite being open-source, is effectively a
proprietary service, which there is no guarantee of continued support
for. If you want to
Thanks Rahul. Please add to the plan;
- critical people; identify the critical code maintainers and note
when they have engaged with Gitter.im on a continuous basis; in
particular we are yet to hear from Lionel and Ibiam.
- licensing; as an open source project within the Software Freedom
Hello Rahul,
Have you looked at Zulip? They host open source organization completely
free and they are 100% open source and still have same platform as Slack,
with a lot of access to integrate bots and even GitHub notifications.
Easy to relate with. It has IOS, MAC OSX, Android, Windows and
Gitter uses your Twitter or GitHub username and avatar. You don’t set up
and maintain a new identity on Gitter. You use your existing one. In a
sense it looks like an extension of GitHub or Twitter, like you already
have an account on Gitter and you just start using it. When your read
discussions
+1 for Gitter over IRC given the recent spam tackling measures taken by
freenode.
Other advantages have already been mentioned, I raised this concern over
mailing list too.
It's high time we consider a switch.
Regards
Sumit Srivastava
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019, 5:58 pm Vipul Gupta, wrote:
> I do
Here's a relevant discussion regarding adoption Gitter I started about 11
months ago:
https://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2018-February/055061.html
Here are other relevant discussions:
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2017-September/054825.html
and here:
Here's a relevant discussion regarding adoption Gitter I started about 11
months ago:
https://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2018-February/055061.html
Here are other relevant discussions:
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2017-September/054825.html
and here:
I do agree with Rahul over the change on communication mediums. This
discussion rose a bit at the start of GSoC 2018 as well, with many fellow
contributors who wanted to apply to Sugar Labs didn't because they could
get a response. And yes, its absolutely okay for a time to have no people
in the
I am proposing a change in the communication medium from IRC to Gitter.
I've made a Gitter Community at https://gitter.im/Sugar-Labs, for people to
try it out. In case people don't like the change, we can shut it down and
stick to IRC.
Following are my reasons for the change;
New users can't see
13 matches
Mail list logo
