subject:"\[sumo\-user\] \(no subject\)"

Re: [sumo-user] (no subject)

2023-06-09 Thread Jakob Erdmann

run with:
--statistic-output stats.xml --tripinfo-output tripinfos.xml
--device.emissions.probability 1

- almost all the average values you want are in statistic-output (see
https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/Output/StatisticOutput.html)
- you can get the average fuel/electricity consumption with
sumo/tools/output/attributeStats.py tripinfos.xml -e emissions -a
fuel_abs,electricity_abs



Am Fr., 9. Juni 2023 um 15:17 Uhr schrieb :

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I’m looking for the most efficient way to get the following statistics:
>
>- the average time taken for a vehicle to complete its route,
>- the average distance travelled for a vehicle to complete its route,
>- the average amount of time a vehicle spent queuing while traversing
>its route,
>- and the average energy consumed for each vehicle to complete their
>route,
>
> of all vehicles that completed their routes during the simulation.
>
>
>
> I could get this information from the xml output files, but they take up a
> lot of space and that adds a lot of processing time.
>
>
>
> Any ideas?
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

[sumo-user] (no subject)

2023-06-09 Thread williamrpaine

Hi all,

 

I'm looking for the most efficient way to get the following statistics:

*   the average time taken for a vehicle to complete its route,
*   the average distance travelled for a vehicle to complete its route,
*   the average amount of time a vehicle spent queuing while traversing
its route,
*   and the average energy consumed for each vehicle to complete their
route,

of all vehicles that completed their routes during the simulation.

 

I could get this information from the xml output files, but they take up a
lot of space and that adds a lot of processing time.

 

Any ideas?

___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

Re: [sumo-user] (no subject)

2023-02-14 Thread HoujiaQD

Thank you very much ! It works!!!

At 2023-02-14 15:57:09, "Jakob Erdmann" wrote:

Most likely, the first vehicle did not clear up the insertion location quickly
enough for the second vehicle to enter on time *safely*.
Where *safely* is related to the gap that the car following model would like to
maintain at insertion based on the desired insertion speed.
You can disable the safety check by setting vehicle attribute
insertionChecks="none" (see
https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Definition_of_Vehicles%2C_Vehicle_Types%2C_and_Routes.html#available_vehicle_attributes).

Am Di., 14. Feb. 2023 um 08:33 Uhr schrieb qidiao :

Hi, Jakob,

I simulated severalcontinuous intersectionson sumo, and the depart time of the
vehicles subjected touniform distribution(the departtime equal to4sin my
experiments). I used reinforcement learning algorithm to generatethe
acceleration for the vehicleat each simulation step. What confuses me is that
the output of the routing file shows that the depart delay is not equal to 0
for some vehicles.(The desired depart time of the second veh should be 8 s, but
the actual depart time is 9 s, depart delay = 1 s). I would like to know how to
solvethis problem.

As always, many thanks !

Houjia

从 Windows 版邮件发送

___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

58 matches

Mail list logo