Re: optical resolution tables

2000-02-12 Thread John Carmichael
Hi Bill: Of course you are right that optical resolution is'nt that important when looking at the shadow's edge cast by a traditional solid gnomon. However, I think it is important for string, cable, rod or spherical gnomons. It is also important when designing the width and size of numerals,

revised optical resolution table

2000-02-12 Thread John Carmichael
Hi Dave and others: Let me see if I understand your calculations. First, knowing that 1 arcminute is the limit of visibility, you calculated that 1 arcminute of width (of a line or point) is equal to a width of .0035 inches at one foot. or .35 inches at 10 ft. and so on. The table which you so

Re: optical resolution tables

2000-02-12 Thread Tloc54452
When I first started using cables for my styles I thought a lot about what would be the correct diameter cable. On one hand, I wanted the cable to be as thin as possible, because a thin shadow gives a more precise time reading than a thick one. On the other hand, if the shadow is too thin,

Re: revised optical resolution table

2000-02-12 Thread Steve Lelievre
- Original Message - From: John Carmichael [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think it would be more useful for a sundial designer to have the table in a more useable form that lists the maximum distance of visibily for different widths. (I picked 1/16 inch increments because these are the sizes of

metric

2000-02-12 Thread Patrick Powers
What's all this inches nonsense. Tsk, Tsk. How could you? ! Patrick

Re: metric

2000-02-12 Thread Tony Moss
Frank Evans contributed: What's all this inches nonsense. Anyone would think we were back landing on the moon or something. Napoleon, thou should'st be living at this hour. and we'd tear every bone apart! Guess who!

Re: revised optical resolution table

2000-02-12 Thread Tony Moss
Steve Lelievre contributed snip - every millimetre of width gives 1 metre of viewing distance - every 1/16 inch gives 5 feet (actually a little over) Which is not too far from the '3mm hourline 4 metres up my house wall' suggested earlier. Tony Moss.

Re: metric

2000-02-12 Thread John Carmichael
Hi Frank: The reason I suggested inches for the optical resolution table was that all of the metals that we use for gnomons such as rods, spheres, plates, and cables are sold in inches or fractions thereof, in the US anyway. I agree that most people who have to do math would prefer to use

Re: metric

2000-02-12 Thread PsykoKidd
Re the comment about Carter and Reagan and metrics. I was a student in elementary and middle school during both administrations, and I can vouch for the fact that attempts to teach us metrics were attempted, and it did seem in vouge for a while at least in the educational system. The problem