Daniel,
I think that now would be an appropriate time to thank you for the Sundial
Mailing List, and for the wide-ranging resources page that you also keep online.
I don't know how long you have maintained the SML, but I know that I have been
a member of it since the 1990s, and it has been a
Daniel,
I think you are right. I did a quick check and
see that a "DMARC message" is sent from a
different email address then what is on the list.
A check by the persons concerned would be helpfull for all subscribers.
Thibaud
At 11:45 11-9-2018, Daniel Roth wrote:
Dear All,
As the list
Dear All,
As the list administrator I'm writing to you that the DMARC topic is annoying a
lot of mailing list users. Some explanations are given here:
https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC
This sundial mailing list is currently hosted by a Mailman version 2.1.29
installation (I have no influence on
Is it really necessary to throw in your political right wing spin when
answering a simple question?
On 2018-09-10 23:31, Roger wrote:
Perhaps it is the nanny state insisting on things that restrict
freedom “for your protection”.
---
We are all frustrated by the overhead on these DMARC wrapped messages. The
emails generally contain valuable information like Kevin Karney’s link. Why are
these massages “not DMARC compliant?” Generally because the sender has changed
their email address. Perhaps they contain hypertext. Perhaps
