Re: accurate vs. precise

1999-04-30 Thread A.R. EDEN
Tom, As an old old timer I cannot resist the temptation, with tongue firmly in cheek, to take you up on the meaurement of the diameter of a rod. Whether it is accurate or precise, I do not know, but to me a rod is a lineal measurement, and does not have a diameter. 72

RE: accurate vs. precise

1999-04-30 Thread Arthur Carlson
Speaking of barleycorns reminds me that one can have a lot of fun with units. My favorite combination has components atmosphere = 101,325 newton/m^2 yard = 0.9144 m barn = 1 x 10^(-28) m^2 Combining these we get the barn yard atmosphere = 9.265158 x

Re: accurate vs. precise

1999-04-30 Thread Dave Bell
On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, Jim_Cobb wrote: why don't you Anglophones try the metric system? - fernando Perhaps you should consider us bilingual in terms of units. Technically inclined (and many other) Anglophones use both English and SI units with comfort, though we prefer one set for some

Re: accurate vs. precise

1999-04-30 Thread Dave Bell
On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, Fernando Cabral wrote: Now, I hate when I see something like 2 yards, 2 feet, 5 inches and (the stroke of mercy) 1/8 -- It takes me several seconds to figure out how tall that person is! Or when I see specifications such as: Torque wheel bolts to 50 foot-pounds (6.9449

Re: accurate vs. precise

1999-04-30 Thread Dave Bell
On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, Fernando Cabral wrote: By the way: does stroke of mercy make sense in English? Yes, but we really never translate it - from the French! Coup de grace Now I am sure it makes sense. But if I were to say coup de grace I would be accused of suffering of francophilia.

Re: accurate vs. precise

1999-04-30 Thread Fernando Cabral
Dear Rod I am glad you've diverted from the accurate vs. precise issue. You know, to me this is so confusing I though I could help myself bringing the terms into Portuguese. You know what? Things only got worse. I was completely uncapable of presenting my own comments about the issue.

Re: accurate vs. precise

1999-04-30 Thread Fernando Cabral
Jim_Cobb wrote: why don't you Anglophones try the metric system? - fernando Perhaps you should consider us bilingual in terms of units. Technically inclined (and many other) Anglophones use both English and SI units with comfort, though we prefer one set for some applications and the

Re: accurate vs. precise

1999-04-30 Thread Fernando Cabral
Dave Bell wrote: On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, Fernando Cabral wrote: Now, I hate when I see something like 2 yards, 2 feet, 5 inches and (the stroke of mercy) 1/8 -- It takes me several seconds to figure out how tall that person is! Or when I see specifications such as: Torque wheel bolts

Re: accurate vs. precise

1999-04-30 Thread Jim_Cobb
why don't you Anglophones try the metric system? - fernando Perhaps you should consider us bilingual in terms of units. Technically inclined (and many other) Anglophones use both English and SI units with comfort, though we prefer one set for some applications and the other for others. I

Re: accurate vs. precise

1999-04-30 Thread Jim_Cobb
Fernando wrote: Now, I hate when I see something like 2 yards, 2 feet, 5 inches and (the stroke of mercy) 1/8 -- It takes me several seconds to figure out how tall that person is! Now that's a tall specimen (2.57 meters)! By the way: does stroke of mercy make sense in English? -

Re: accurate vs. precise

1999-04-30 Thread Jim_Cobb
Dave Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (I believe tongue in cheek): Indeed! Why, just last night, I was working with furlongs and fifths of seconds... Dave It's interesting that you mention this. Over the last several weeks I have been reading Tolkien's Lord of the Rings to my children. It

Re: accurate vs. precise

1999-04-30 Thread Slawomir K. Grzechnik
I think Mike Shaw stated the matter for good using fromerly cited examples of darts and guns. Strictly speaking accuracy and precision are sort of independent. If your mean (average) shot is on the target then you are accurate even if you never hit the target precisely. Your shots may be off