Wikipedia says Mayall Mayall's, and Rorh's formulas are wrong.

2015-04-08 Thread Michael Ossipoff
Here is what wikipedia says, regarding formulas for Reclining-Declining sundials: In fact it is only in the last decade that agreement has been found on the correct hour angle formula for this type of dial. [...] Previous formulae given by Rohr and Mayall are not correct. That wikipedia

Wikipedia says Mayall Mayall's, and Rorh's formulas are wrong.

2015-04-05 Thread Michael Ossipoff
Additionally, Mayall Mayall's formula (shown in the notes at the bottom of the wikipedia Sundial article) for the angle between the substyle and the line for noon, gives the right result for: Lat = 51.5 Inclination = 45 Declination = 45 degrees left of south Michael Ossipoff

Wikipedia says Mayall Mayall's, and Rorh's formulas are wrong.

2015-04-05 Thread Michael Ossipoff
I should add that the correct result described above, with Mayall Mayall's formula for the angle between the substyle and the line for noon, is gotten when the decline-direction (D) is measured from north. So D is the azimuth that the dial is facing. Michael Ossipoff

Wikipedia says Mayall Mayall's, and Rorh's formulas are wrong.

2015-04-04 Thread Michael Ossipoff
Sorry, I didn't intend to start new thread; I'm adding something to my Mayall Mayall question-post: First, I thank Simon for the answer and link. I've decided to divulge the reason for my question about Mayall Mayall: The wikipedia Sundial article says that Mayall Mayall, and Rohr as well,