No, I have the same problem with brand new SunFire v240's.The problem still exists. The key is to NOT set your cisco to anything but auto/auto with new hardware.I suppose then its a good thing that I've never really used Cisco switches outside of a networking lab environment. NetGear and BayStack
SRSS2.0 when I run utgstatus I show sever servers as -A- and not up.
if I go to that server and run utgstatus then it shows up on all the
boxes as UA-
It's my guess some multi-cast packet updates the status of these
hosts. How often does this happen and can it be tuned to prevent
bogus sta
On Sep 27, 2005, at 10:42, Dave McGuire wrote:
"A few years back" in terms of current product offerings, you
mean. For those of us who don't dumpsterize hardware just because
something new comes out, it's still a very real problem. I have
about thirty Netra T1-105s deployed at work...I
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Why is it that everyone assumes this problem is so common?
> Is there a particular line (or lines) of switches that most
> Sun administrators use that have poortly designed auto-neg
> capabilities?
SUN and Cisco hardware are notor
> Correct me if I am wrong here, but isn't this why they want port fast
> disabled or enabled? I can never remember which. The result is that
> the switch port comes up faster?
Sort of. Enabling Port fast means that the switch doesn't try to do spanning
tree on that port. On link up, Spanning tre
Port fast should be enabled, which is basically turning off spanning tree.
{Darkavich} Steven Misrack wrote:
On Sep 27, 2005, at 08:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not that I think the duplex neg has anything to do with this
particular issue
but I can share this with regards to Cisco switches.
On Sep 27, 2005, at 08:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not that I think the duplex neg has anything to do with this
particular issue
but I can share this with regards to Cisco switches. My 170's both
mate to a
Cisco 3750 and I have them hard coated in the switch to full. I did
have a
negotia
On Sep 27, 2005, at 10:51 AM, Craig Bender wrote:
Force the switch that your sun ray on to 100 full or put it on a
10/half hub. Watch the SR go to 10 half and exhibit the exact
problems that were explained.
Also, it's well documented that Cisco switches and Sun servers had a
serious issue pe
On Sep 27, 2005, at 05:24, Derek Konigsberg wrote:
Why is it that everyone assumes this problem is so common? Is
there a particular line (or lines) of switches that most Sun
administrators use that have poortly designed auto-neg
capabilities? (an issue that's never come up with any of
On Sep 27, 2005, at 02:26, Damiano ALBANI wrote:
In fact, I have a very small *home* setup, comprised
of only 1 SRSS 3.1 server on Linux Ubuntu and a SunRay
1. They are on the same switch, with very little other
network traffic.
Is there a debug option that I could enable to see why
there is t
On Sep 27, 2005, at 8:24 AM, Derek Konigsberg wrote:
You know, it's amazing just how many times people assume it must be a
duplex and/or speed auto-negotiation issue whenever we have any sort
of network performance issue in Sun hardware. Be it with Sun Rays,
NFS being slow talking to something
I've seen problems with auto-negotiation between older Catalyst switches
(5xxx) series and Sun server NICs. However IMHO, server NICs should never be
allowed to auto-negotiate and always should be forced to a known setting -
that the switch agrees with. If this ever fails, you've got problems to w
Not that I think the duplex neg has anything to do with this particular issue
but I can share this with regards to Cisco switches. My 170's both mate to a
Cisco 3750 and I have them hard coated in the switch to full. I did have a
negotiation issue at first but that was to do with the fact that t
Force the switch that your sun ray on to 100 full or put it on a 10/half
hub. Watch the SR go to 10 half and exhibit the exact problems that
were explained.
Also, it's well documented that Cisco switches and Sun servers had a
serious issue performing auto-neg correctly a few years back. Thin
How's about utcapture (-r) to get a first glance on whats going on...
Damiano ALBANI schrieb:
--- Craig Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
Sounds like a duplex mismatch somewhere.
Are you sure the DTU is running @ 100 Full duplex?
What happens when
you hit the three volume keys? Does it
Sounds like a duplex mismatch somewhere.
Are you sure the DTU is running @ 100 Full duplex?
You know, it's amazing just how many times people assume it must be a
duplex and/or speed auto-negotiation issue whenever we have any sort of
network performance issue in Sun hardware. Be it with Sun
--- Craig Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> Sounds like a duplex mismatch somewhere.
>
> Are you sure the DTU is running @ 100 Full duplex?
> What happens when
> you hit the three volume keys? Does it say 100F?
As I have a PC keyboard, I don't have these keys.
However, when the SunRay boot
17 matches
Mail list logo
