Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-27 Thread Dreamcat4
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Gorka Lertxundi glertxu...@gmail.com wrote: Dreamcat4, pull request are always welcomed! 2015-02-27 0:40 GMT+01:00 Laurent Bercot ska-supervis...@skarnet.org: On 26/02/2015 21:53, John Regan wrote: Besides, the whole idea here is to make an image

Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-27 Thread Dreamcat4
* Once there are 2+ similar s6 images. * May be worth to consult Docker Inc employees about official / base image builds on the hub. Here is an example of why we might benefit from seeking help from Docker Inc: * Multiple FROM images (multiple inheritance). There should already be an open

Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-27 Thread Dreamcat4
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Dreamcat4 dreamc...@gmail.com wrote: * Once there are 2+ similar s6 images. * May be worth to consult Docker Inc employees about official / base image builds on the hub. Here is an example of why we might benefit from seeking help from Docker Inc

Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-27 Thread Dreamcat4
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Laurent Bercot ska-supervis...@skarnet.org wrote: On 26/02/2015 21:53, John Regan wrote: Besides, the whole idea here is to make an image that follows best practices, and best practices state we should be using a process supervisor that cleans up orphaned

Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-26 Thread Dreamcat4
sufficiently complex software to benefit from being run under a process supervisor such as s6. * maven: https://registry.hub.docker.com/_/maven/ * consul: https://github.com/progrium/docker-consul * pipework: https://github.com/dreamcat4/docker-images/blob/master/pipework/2.%20Usage.md#run-modes

Re: Arch Linux derivative using s6?

2015-04-19 Thread Dreamcat4
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Laurent Bercot ska-supervis...@skarnet.org wrote: If I ever have to install a distribution again, I'll probably go with Alpine, unless something even better comes along. I also would use Alpine, except they just don't comprehensively support all up-to-date

Re: [s6] debian packaging

2015-08-11 Thread Dreamcat4
Will it work on ubuntu? I ask b/c I have built packages the other way around. On 14.04 trusty, which it then turns out also worked on Jessie (8.X) On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) skar...@clacke.user.lysator.liu.se wrote: [repost with correct sender] On 11-Aug-2015 7:51

Re: s6 in production on Ubuntu - yeah!

2020-11-04 Thread Dreamcat4
Yep. Have been using s6-overlay inside docker containers. On top of the ubuntu 20.04 base image. It works well enough... Perhaps you could speak to some Canonical people about your usage of s6? Maybe it would be helpful to them, in some broader sense? Like to be a little bit less reliant upon