>> It took several minutes for the General page to come up.
>> messageSendTimeRequest is 0, which probably doesn't tell you anything, so
>> here's the page.
>
>Hmm. It's really struggling, even though it's not doing anything...
>I dunno what we can do about it...
Produce a couple of full stackdump
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 15:30, Toad wrote:
> Hmm. It's really struggling, even though it's not doing anything...
> I dunno what we can do about it...
I moved it to the laptop, and it seems to be doing fairly well. Oddly, there
is little activity on my Freenet port, as seen in tcpdump, even when
I noticed that the
"daily" unstable snapshots like "freenet-unstable-20040406.tgz" report old build
numbers.
What do I have to do
for downloading the "very" latest unstable builds as announces on the tech
list.
regards
MichaelMy Inbox is protected by SP
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 03:23:14PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 April 2004 14:17, Toad wrote:
> > You could try doCPULoad=true, but you'd have to turn off the background
> > CPU hog. That makes the node tell other nodes to send it fewer queries
> > until its CPU usage is reasonable.
>
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 14:17, Toad wrote:
> You could try doCPULoad=true, but you'd have to turn off the background
> CPU hog. That makes the node tell other nodes to send it fewer queries
> until its CPU usage is reasonable.
>
> What is the messageSendTime? On the General page?
It took several
You could try doCPULoad=true, but you'd have to turn off the background
CPU hog. That makes the node tell other nodes to send it fewer queries
until its CPU usage is reasonable.
What is the messageSendTime? On the General page?
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 02:14:48PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Tu
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 12:28, Toad wrote:
> What are the messageSendTime's like? I suppose you won't know if the web
> interface hasn't come up... What's the last thing in the logfile?
The web interface comes up but is very slow. I turned the node off, as it was
just hiking the load average and
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 06:15:17AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 April 2004 00:40, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> > I've been getting good results with the following:
> >
> > maxNodeConnections=128
> > maximumThreads=128
> > rtMaxNodes=256
> > targetMaxThreads=128
> > tfAbsoluteMaxThreads=12
peer reviewed publications about it out there.
Woah.
Well, I pointed them to the IEEE paper for starters.
The submitter really
> has to be a small-footprint application like a browser applet.
Hmm. So what would it connect to? Browser applets can only talk to the
server they were downloaded from
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 06:15:17AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 April 2004 00:40, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> > I've been getting good results with the following:
> >
> > maxNodeConnections=128
> > maximumThreads=128
> > rtMaxNodes=256
> > targetMaxThreads=128
> > tfAbsoluteMaxThreads=12
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:58:45PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> Thanks for the response anyway. :-) And don't feel bad about your "ignorance"
> in certain areas. Most of us are still learning as we go here. :-)
Including me! There's plenty of parts of the code that I'm not familiar
with, an
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 02:27:05AM -0600, S wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:33:41 -0800
> Steven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > contrary to everything in freenet's documentation, I have better luck
> > retrieving with a freshly started/reseeded node than one that has been
> > running for a whil
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 07:10:25PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> I'm running Freenet on a 48MB machine which is also running mprime. The load
> average varies from 7 to 14, whereas before I started Freenet the load
> average was around 1.3. I'm using j2re 1.5.0-beta, which I downloaded today
> fr
I'm afraid I can't, you need to cancel your subscription through PayPal.
Kind regards,
Ian.
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 16:13, Anjan Bacchu(J) wrote:
> Subscription Name: Freenet Project Membership
> Subscription Number: S-6G704031JR625064Y
>
> Thank you,
>
> I will at a later opportunity try to b
Subscription Name: Freenet Project MembershipSubscription Number:
S-6G704031JR625064Y
Thank you,
I will at a later opportunity try to become a
member.
BR,
~A
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 06:44, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> I have 512 MB of RAM. I'm curious now, how are you starting the node?
> What command are you using?
./start-freenet.sh
I have 48 meg. What settings do you recommend?
> Could you try the following and let us know what you get:
>
> java
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 06:08:36AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 April 2004 00:40, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> > I've been getting good results with the following:
> >
> > maxNodeConnections=128
> > maximumThreads=128
> > rtMaxNodes=256
> > targetMaxThreads=128
> > tfAbsoluteMaxThreads=12
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 00:40, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> I've been getting good results with the following:
>
> maxNodeConnections=128
> maximumThreads=128
> rtMaxNodes=256
> targetMaxThreads=128
> tfAbsoluteMaxThreads=128
The load average still shot up. It's 19.65 12 minutes after I started it, a
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 00:40, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> I've been getting good results with the following:
>
> maxNodeConnections=128
> maximumThreads=128
> rtMaxNodes=256
> targetMaxThreads=128
> tfAbsoluteMaxThreads=128
How much RAM do you have? It said "Reducing rtMaxNodes to 64". It still tak
19 matches
Mail list logo
