On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 10:19:55PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| java -cp freenet.jar freenet.Version on a command line?
Freenet: Fred 0.5 (protocol STABLE-1.50) build 5084 (last good build: 5083)
| Show me it.
Same as
S wrote:
I don't really agree with the idea that such a pr0xy would bring
exposure or users to Freenet. Joe Surfer, upon finding your gatewayed
content in Google, is going to click through, access the content, and
move on, not realizing that he's ventured beyond the confines of the
normal web.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 01:52:05PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
People have run public nodes before, but Google never indexed them
beyond the main Web Interface page, so their audience consisted of
people who a) were already Freenet users and b) knew exactly what to
search for in Google to
Toad wrote:
Well, this contradics what you just wrote above. If you are right
on this point, then your fears about thousands of users leeching
and burdening freenet without giving anything back are unfounded
already because of this, even disregarding my arguments above. Or
vice versa. Of course,
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 03:35:40PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Toad wrote:
Well, this contradics what you just wrote above. If you are right
on this point, then your fears about thousands of users leeching
and burdening freenet without giving anything back are unfounded
already because
If im trying to open a freesite i mostly get an errormessage like:
--
Couldn't retrieve key:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/BPC/3//*
Hops To Live: *15*
Error: *Route Not Found*
Attempts were made to contact 1 nodes.
* 0 were
Toad wrote:
They are not indexed by google because by default fproxy sends a
robots.txt indicating that it shouldn't be spidered.
Aaah, I see. That explains S' comment too. Well, current
legislation does not require me to learn java, but it
does not forbid me to either ;)
[prosecutor's block
Toad wrote:
They are not indexed by google because by default fproxy sends a
robots.txt indicating that it shouldn't be spidered.
Aaah, I see. That explains S' comment too. Well, current
legislation does not require me to learn java, but it
does not forbid me to either ;)
[prosecutor's block
M. Seredszun wrote:
Couldn't retrieve key:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/BPC/3//*
Hops To Live: *15*
Error: *Route Not Found*
Can you help me Pls ?
Keep trying. It's out here, it's loading alright at
https://81.169.159.148:8080/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/BPC/3//
but it's slow. If nothing helps, download
OTOH woulden't the open proxy be an isp? The proxy is really just a
router between two networks. The networks don't need to have the same
lower level protocalls... The other differene would be that no one is
paying him for the service. But then comes in the free ISPs of the dot
com era. Given the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| No, if you can do that, then you can portscan for Freenet nodes. That's
| a REALLY bad idea. You need to use some sort of seednodes mechanism.
Why is that a bad idea? If a government is paranoid enough, they can
just put devices all
I've started using Freenet for the Nth time (transient - 5084 - WinXP - Sun
JVM 1.4.1), and am going through the 99% RNF phase. I know this is normal,
but I noticed that many of them RNF instantly and say no nodes were tried. If
it's not too hard to explain, I'd like to know the reason for
12 matches
Mail list logo
