Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is your definition of dirty hack?
Fair enough. Would you say that the solution is to make sure the images
load the first time from IMG SRCs?
If that were possible, sure. At least if they are available. If not
(like edition headers), Freenet will not manage
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote:
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[putting every image into an iframe to work around Freenet's
reloading bugs]
It works pretty well on the SSKvsCHK site :)
One should not justify a dirty hack
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:17:30PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote:
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
b) the failing file is an image. In that case it just disappears and
you have to reload the page manually until you have all
images. (alternatively, you can open
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a) one does not use Fproxy for fetching a file
In which case whatever you did use would retry.
Not necessarily. Scripts talking FCP via netcat most likely won't...
And, I think it is not an option that *if* every tool retried (just
to make it work in b0rken
Roger Hayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael Schierl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
For me it seems as Fred is too fail-fast. It may try for a few more
seconds or minutes instead of returning the RNF nearly immediately
(and very often). Putting that retry to the user's side (being it the
browser
Niklas Bergh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now I believe I can live with freenet being slow and that
many documents are not immediately available. What is
annoying me is that _I_ will have to do the retrying. Why is
that not a task for the server?
You sure? I thought we had a meta-refresh
Garb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are right - that certainly seems to be exactly what I am looking for (if
we exclude J.Lo's private phone number...). But where is that information
actually located? It is not in the HTML-source of the page. Could it be in a
special file with a name that FIW
Lloyd Burris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When ever I try to submit a freesight at the end fiw says unable to
build a map file.
That is most likely a FIW bug (since *building* mapfiles has nothing
to do with Freenet, only inserting them). Please post some more
information (contents of the
Pierre Abbat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I keep getting errors like this when browsing Freenet:
The network is busy, please try again later.
Couldn't connect to the network. Are you sure you have configured Freenet
correctly? Also make sure that you are connected to the internet.
A tcpdump
Garb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have been using FIW for inserting sites, but because I'm a hands-on kinda
guy and a masochist, I would really like to try doing it a bit more
manually. Unfortunately I don't seem to be quite smart enough to figure out
how. My problem is the contruction of
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, this bug is really somewhere inside freenet. Either the accept()
call was not handled quick enough (dunno how accept is called in nio)
or Fred really closes open sockets without having sent any data.
Consistently? Can you write me a test case?
Since it
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I also get quite some of these:
java.io.IOException: Premature end of stream
at fiw.fcp.FCPMessage.readMessage(FCPMessage.java:34)
at fiw.fcp.FCPConn.insertStream(FCPConn.java:263)
Hmm. Why does fred close his connections prematurely? It's not
Michael Schierl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, after a few tests (replaced Fred by a simple prog that says
nothing but disconnects on a keypress) i can see that I get an
IOException like the one above when the connection is closed from the
peer, but a ConnectException when I run
Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sites. Maybe because of the still very slow insert performance of fiw, which
still takes 36 hours to successfully insert a 4 MB freesite (fuqid inserts much
faster).
Any ideas why? I'd like to make FIW fast too ;)
mihi
Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I get many of these (using FIW 0.08):
#11 02 ***RouteNF *removed* (Chunk 6) [42/42/42]
they can't be right as I only have 50 nodes in my routing table and a max
connections number of 100.
Hehe. That 42/42/42 (do you know Douglas Adam's Hitchhiker's guide
Hi guys,
You might have noticed that i do not have the time to follow all
discussions on the freenet mailing lists. However, I do not want to give
up FIW development (although the last update has been some time ago).
So I decided to create a discussion mailing list for FIW - additionally
to the
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:34:11 +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is a FIW issue which is known for some time now but has never been fixed
I know it since a few days after i released FIW 0.07.
And i fixed it in CVS already. So if you can use CVS and compile it
yourself, give it a try.
On 15 Nov 2003 22:13:21 -, panta-admin wrote:
Michael if you read this could you please invest some of your precious time
into fiw, it cant handle splitfiles at the moment,
if you read mxbee's message in devl: fuqid cannot atm either - so it is a
freenet bug. sorry.
if you already tried
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 23:34:21 -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
b/w
As a photographer that means black and white
On the Internet it often means by the way
What does it mean here?
bandwidth?
mihi
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I'm using FIW, a swing application, with Kaffe 1.0.7, with only some
warning messages in console
JFTR: FIW 0.04b is not (yet) Swing, it's still AWT.
thx,
mihi, not subscribed to support@, but hoping that it'll get through
20 matches
Mail list logo
