On 20 Dec 2004 at 9:22, Dave wrote:
I assumed that 8.3 name creation was part of the VFAT spec. Why would you
want to turn it off? (This is a genuine question, not a troll. I'm
wondering what the benefits might be)
- Original Message -
From: Konstantin Svist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12 Dec 2004 at 18:07, Chris Gentile wrote:
bash-2.05b$ more hs_err_pid6154.log
Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0x40324F3A
Function=(null)+0x40324F3A
Library=/usr/java/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so
Signal 11 is segmentation fault isn't it?
NOTE: We are unable to
On 12 Dec 2004 at 21:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Please report this error at
# http://java.sun.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
Have you done that? Might help. Unlikely, with Sun, but possible.
Are you sure you're not thinking about Microsoft here rather than
Sun? :)
On 22 Nov 2004 at 3:39, Sonax wrote:
No, FIND is not dead, i have just been having some ISP related
trouble. I hope to get back by the middle of this week, but i have
also learned that promises from my ISP are not worth... well, much.
Promises from ISPs are worth slightly less than promises
On 25 Aug 2004 at 0:32, Toad wrote:
The weakness is insoluble. Unless nodes run 24x7 for LONG periods, and
encrypt the entire store with an ephemeral key, thus wiping it on
startup.
I thought it was a stated goal of freenet to make it impossible to
have this kind of breach without an
On 14 Aug 2004 at 1:06, Paul Schauble wrote:
There should be a relationship between bandwidth and store size. At a guess,
it's exponential, doubling the bandwidth can support a store 4 times larger.
That's quadratic, not exponential. The store size would be scaling
with the square of the
On 14 Aug 2004 at 11:36, Bart van der Ouderaa wrote:
The problem was that i didn't even get an open port at (portscan
showed no open port betweeen 8000 and 9000).
Did you run the port scan locally? If it was a remote probe (such as
results from going to any of those security-related
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=freetellahl=enlr=ie=UTF-
8c2coff=1safe=offselm=Xns951A1E8DA9B51neo1061hotmailcom%4066.185.95
.104rnum=2
It's a very, very, very bloody long posting, and the really relevant-
to-you stuff is only near the bottom, but there's a proposal for a
On 2 Jul 2004 at 11:54, miguel wrote:
This talk of blacklisting makes me want to puke.
Let's just go back to the censored internet. Man, we're getting our own little
versions of Big Brother on here.
If you don't want to look at it, don't look at it, or get off of Freenet.
I doubt that
On 27 Jun 2004 at 11:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i suppose the heavy cpu usage arises because the node tries to contact all nodes it
knows. this of course won't work as it is not connected to the internet. a solution
would be to delete the routing table so it
doesn't even know of other
On 16 Jun 2004 at 10:07, Michael R. Stork wrote:
Anytime I've had to restart my node, it appears that the data store is
just plain gone. I can go from having my resources at 60+% full one
minutes, restart, and I'm at 0. That and it then seems to need to be
active again for 10+ hours before
On 15 Jun 2004 at 23:29, Troed Sångberg wrote:
Saw this on /. - thought it might interest someone. Especially the part
about using the server JVM instead of client JVM when speed is an issue
(i.e, if you have plenty of ram but you feel Freenet use too much CPU)
On 25 May 2004 at 13:37, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Ian Clarke wrote:
That is a shame. Clearly I don't agree with your reasoning, there is no
evidence that any other language would not have similar or worse issues
(consider the amount of time we would spend
On 16 Mar 2004 at 15:29, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
Paul Derbyshire wrote:
What about inline images?
Other http:// URLs are automatically converted by fproxy to point to a
warning page, so inline images are not displayed.
So freesites can't have images? Or can, if the image URLs point
On 15 Mar 2004 at 14:10, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
Michal Charemza wrote:
!DOCTYPE, instead of
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC blah blah
Is this due to fproxy's anonymity filter? If so, why does it
remove/shorten them? Also, I've noticed that the default gateway page
does have a full doctype
On 15 Feb 2004 at 18:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Die E-Mail, die Sie am Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:14:02 -0500 an [EMAIL PROTECTED] gesendet
haben, konnte nicht zugestellt werden, da die E-Mail Adresse [EMAIL PROTECTED] nicht
existiert. Achten Sie auf die richtige Schreibung der E-Mail Adresse und
On 9 Feb 2004 at 18:52, Your Name wrote:
2 - I'm using the Internet Connection Firewall bundled with
WinXP do I need to configure it to work with Freenet?
No, you need to disable it and install a software firewall that can
be trusted, such as the one available for free from
On 27 Jan 2004 at 1:58, Toad wrote:
2. In some instances, we may want to receive the data. This could maybe
be determined by unobtanium on the datastore or something.
Unobtanium? :) Rewatched the Core on DVD lately?
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL
On 21 Jan 2004 at 19:43, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Since you announced the last stable release I have been unable to download
a new release.
Background: For about a month I have gotten sporadic replacement of URLs
by Internet Explorer by the following:
On 20 Jan 2004 at 2:27, Toad wrote:
You run fred on a modem? You have even more patience than I attributed
to you :)
I thought latency, rather than bandwidth, was the factor most
requiring patience of people browsing freenet. :)
___
Support mailing
On 18 Jan 2004 at 5:24, S wrote:
Anyone can change the latest build number by editing Version.java and
compiling the source on their machine. If you were so inclined, you
could change your latest build number to and confuse a whole lot
of people. Apparently someone has compiled their own
On 18 Jan 2004 at 18:00, Troed Sångberg wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:44:31 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
number of RNFs and increases the chance of finding data, but it may also
increase the overall network load.. we may have taken it too far in the
other direction in 5060. The
Got around to updating to 5061. Installer wart is as follows: when it
reaches its own executable it pops up something I thought had gone
the way of the dodo (and MS-DOS): abort, retry, ignore. Abort is
rather drastic, and retry can't possibly work, so you have to ignore.
The installer should
You may remember me as the one who had problems with fproxy that
proved to be brain-dead IE defaults. Turns out fproxy and my node are
working fine, and the node gets around 1 request a second suggesting
it's integrating way better than the freesite of evil keeps bitching
about. :)
Got the windows webinstall executable and ran it less than 2 hours
ago. Node may or may not be running ok, but fproxy is definitely on
the blink. Looked at (without altering) the options, and nothing is
obviously bad, such as say fproxy being turned off.
Symptom:
Server Error
The following
25 matches
Mail list logo
