Matthew Toseland :
On Sunday 18 Nov 2012 14:52:48 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:16:21 +0100, Jep wrote:
In my opinion, it is good for security to use a browser other than
the system default for Freenet keys, a browser without any plugins
and incapable of Flash, activeX sh** and wha
On Sunday 18 Nov 2012 14:52:48 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:16:21 +0100, Jep wrote:
> > In my opinion, it is good for security to use a browser other than
> > the system default for Freenet keys, a browser without any plugins
> > and incapable of Flash, activeX sh** and whathaveyou.
Dennis Nezic schreef:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:16:21 +0100, Jep wrote:
In my opinion, it is good for security to use a browser other than
the system default for Freenet keys, a browser without any plugins
and incapable of Flash, activeX sh** and whathaveyou.
Can there be a way implemented to have
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:16:21 +0100, Jep wrote:
> In my opinion, it is good for security to use a browser other than
> the system default for Freenet keys, a browser without any plugins
> and incapable of Flash, activeX sh** and whathaveyou.
>
> Can there be a way implemented to have everything Fre
In my opinion, it is good for security to use a browser other than the
system default for Freenet keys, a browser without any plugins and
incapable of Flash, activeX sh** and whathaveyou.
Can there be a way implemented to have everything Freenetwise use that
secondary browser?
Thank you.
___
