You really ought to get a second mailing list for the 0.7 network.
Because I'm pretty sure no one here cares until there's an opennet.
On 8/16/06, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freenet build 947 is now available. This build simply makes 944
mandatory as of midnight GMT on Monday
0.7 is the official, maintained version of freenet. It's what you get
when you download freenet from the website. It has, at least, several
hundred nodes. And we simply cannot implement opennet at this point. It
is important that we implement opennet, but not yet, because there are
serious
Freenet build 942 is now available. The main change is that ping times
are now averaged over a longer period. This should prevent oscillation
when the node is limited by CPU usage. Please upgrade.
--
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey -
Freenet 0.7 build 941 is out. It should be available from auto-update as
well as from the mirrors. Please upgrade. This build fixes a bug in the
insert resuming code that was causing large file inserts to be corrupted
and replaced with much smaller files (what was actually happening was
that the
Freenet 0.7 build 941 is out. It should be available from auto-update as
well as from the mirrors. Please upgrade. This build fixes a bug in the
insert resuming code that was causing large file inserts to be corrupted
and replaced with much smaller files (what was actually happening was
that the
Freenet build 942 is now available. The main change is that ping times
are now averaged over a longer period. This should prevent oscillation
when the node is limited by CPU usage. Please upgrade.
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey -
Freenet 0.7 build 940 is available from the mirrors, and will be
available from the auto-updater very soon. This features various
changes, including making the load limiting data persistent, which
should help to stabilize the network, and various internal refactorings,
and some minor bugfixes.
Freenet 0.7 build 940 is available from the mirrors, and will be
available from the auto-updater very soon. This features various
changes, including making the load limiting data persistent, which
should help to stabilize the network, and various internal refactorings,
and some minor bugfixes.
On 8/9/06, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 07:19:31PM -0600, chris mcbrien wrote:
> > I grabbed to update.sh from that site, and when I run it I get these errors:
...
> > java.io.FileNotFoundException:
> >
Try running it again; that looks like a temporary problem with the
mirrors.
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 07:19:31PM -0600, chris mcbrien wrote:
> I grabbed to update.sh from that site, and when I run it I get these errors:
>
> user at dilbert:~/freenet$ ./update.sh
> ./update.sh: line 3: cd: @path@:
On 8/9/06, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 07:19:31PM -0600, chris mcbrien wrote:
I grabbed to update.sh from that site, and when I run it I get these errors:
...
java.io.FileNotFoundException:
I grabbed to update.sh from that site, and when I run it I get these errors:
user at dilbert:~/freenet$ ./update.sh
./update.sh: line 3: cd: @path@: No such file or directory
Updating freenet
Fetching update.sh
Downloaded update.sh
/home/user/freenet/update.sh: line 3: cd: @path@: No such file or
Freenet 0.7 mandatory build 939 is now available. Please upgrade.
Amongst various other improvements, this includes some significant
changes to the way data is stored on the network; there is now a
long-term datastore and a short-term datacache, with the first storing
only data close to the node's
I grabbed to update.sh from that site, and when I run it I get these errors:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/freenet$ ./update.sh
./update.sh: line 3: cd: @path@: No such file or directory
Updating freenet
Fetching update.sh
Downloaded update.sh
/home/user/freenet/update.sh: line 3: cd: @path@: No such file
Try running it again; that looks like a temporary problem with the
mirrors.
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 07:19:31PM -0600, chris mcbrien wrote:
I grabbed to update.sh from that site, and when I run it I get these errors:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/freenet$ ./update.sh
./update.sh: line 3: cd: @path@: No
Freenet 0.7 mandatory build 920 is now out. It should be available from
the auto-update system and the mirrors. Please upgrade ASAP. This build
will become mandatory at midnight on Tuesday. 920 fixes a major (but
non-progressive) memory leak relating to insert resuming. This has
probably been the
Freenet 0.7 mandatory build 920 is now out. It should be available from
the auto-update system and the mirrors. Please upgrade ASAP. This build
will become mandatory at midnight on Tuesday. 920 fixes a major (but
non-progressive) memory leak relating to insert resuming. This has
probably been the
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:48:31AM -0400, Evan Daniel wrote:
> As of this morning, my node (build 891) had been trying to fetch build
> 892 for some time (over a day) without success.
Hmmm, I can fetch #892 here... And the auto-update offers me 894 (it
shows the button). Dunno what the problem is
Freenet 0.7 build 894 is now available. This build, and the builds
immediately before it, should fix insert resuming: Persistent inserts
should now resume from where they left off when the node is restarted.
Other recent changes include a minor fix to backoff, which may improve
matters.
Please
As of this morning, my node (build 891) had been trying to fetch build
892 for some time (over a day) without success.
BTW, is there a reason new node rev fetches aren't in the queue?
Also, has the auto-updater revocation system ever been tested?
Evan Daniel
On 7/25/06, Matthew Toseland
Sorry for the newbie question when I try to update I get this on
my Linux terminal. Is the message about them differing Okay?
Updating freenet
Downloading sha1test.jar utility jar which will download the actual update.
Fetching freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar
Attempt 1
Attempt 2
Downloaded
Freenet 0.7 build 894 is now available. This build, and the builds
immediately before it, should fix insert resuming: Persistent inserts
should now resume from where they left off when the node is restarted.
Other recent changes include a minor fix to backoff, which may improve
matters.
Please
As of this morning, my node (build 891) had been trying to fetch build
892 for some time (over a day) without success.
BTW, is there a reason new node rev fetches aren't in the queue?
Also, has the auto-updater revocation system ever been tested?
Evan Daniel
On 7/25/06, Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:48:31AM -0400, Evan Daniel wrote:
As of this morning, my node (build 891) had been trying to fetch build
892 for some time (over a day) without success.
Hmmm, I can fetch #892 here... And the auto-update offers me 894 (it
shows the button). Dunno what the problem is
Sorry for the newbie question when I try to update I get this on
my Linux terminal. Is the message about them differing Okay?
Updating freenet
Downloading sha1test.jar utility jar which will download the actual update.
Fetching freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar
Attempt 1
Attempt 2
Downloaded
Freenet 0.7 build 880 is now available. Inserts of single files are now
resumable, so if you start a large insert, then restart your node before
it is finished, you will not lose all the progress on that insert.
Please upgrade. The build should appear on the auto-update system very
soon. If your
Freenet 0.7 build 880 is now available. Inserts of single files are now
resumable, so if you start a large insert, then restart your node before
it is finished, you will not lose all the progress on that insert.
Please upgrade. The build should appear on the auto-update system very
soon. If your
Build 868 is now available. Please upgrade, it will become mandatory at
02:00 GMT on Sunday.
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:15:37PM +0100, wrote:
> Sorry folks, there was a deadlock. Build 864 is now available. It is
> mandatory at midnight GMT on Monday.
>
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:55:34PM
Sorry folks, there was a deadlock. Build 864 is now available. It is
mandatory at midnight GMT on Monday.
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:55:34PM +0100, wrote:
> Freenet 0.7 build 853 is now available. This is a fairly experimental
> build; it includes major changes to the bandwidth limiting code,
>
Freenet 0.7 build 853 is now available. This is a fairly experimental
build; it includes major changes to the bandwidth limiting code,
including the addition of "soft" limits based on the expected bytes to
be used by a request. It includes an input bandwidth limit setting
(which is purely soft
Freenet 0.7 build 853 is now available. This is a fairly experimental
build; it includes major changes to the bandwidth limiting code,
including the addition of soft limits based on the expected bytes to
be used by a request. It includes an input bandwidth limit setting
(which is purely soft i.e.
Sorry folks, there was a deadlock. Build 864 is now available. It is
mandatory at midnight GMT on Monday.
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:55:34PM +0100, wrote:
Freenet 0.7 build 853 is now available. This is a fairly experimental
build; it includes major changes to the bandwidth limiting code,
Build 868 is now available. Please upgrade, it will become mandatory at
02:00 GMT on Sunday.
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:15:37PM +0100, wrote:
Sorry folks, there was a deadlock. Build 864 is now available. It is
mandatory at midnight GMT on Monday.
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:55:34PM +0100,
Freenet 0.7 build 844 is now available. It should show up through the
auto-update system in half an hour or so. Please upgrade ASAP! This
build will become mandatory at midnight GMT. This build fixes a serious
and long standing bug in a "time dependant averager" class used widely
in 0.7. One
Hi,
I updated to Freenet 0.7 Build #794 r9119. CPU is now at 100%
utilization.
Could be a bug. I shutdown my node for now.
Greetings,
Bouke
I updated to Freenet 0.7 Build #794 r9119. CPU is now at 100%
utilization.
I updated to Freenet 0.7 Build #799 r9137 and CPU utilization is good
now.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
Hi All,
I am using IRC now. Never knew it was so easy.
Well, my node runs now.
Bouke
On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 22:59 +0200, freenet at altweb.nl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > Try reinstalling. There is a new installer that may not have this
> > problem. [..]
>
> It works now: Freenet 0.7 Build #779
Hi All,
I am using IRC now. Never knew it was so easy.
Well, my node runs now.
Bouke
On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 22:59 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Try reinstalling. There is a new installer that may not have this
problem. [..]
It works now: Freenet 0.7 Build #779 r9029. Thanks
Hi all,
> 2. Where could I find my own key?
>
> I found some help in the FAQ. But it doesn't work on my version.
At http://localhost:/darknet/ I found "My Reference". There's also a
form where I could paste keys.
Bouke
Hi all,
2. Where could I find my own key?
I found some help in the FAQ. But it doesn't work on my version.
At http://localhost:/darknet/ I found My Reference. There's also a
form where I could paste keys.
Bouke
___
Support mailing list
Hi all,
> Try reinstalling. There is a new installer that may not have this
> problem. [..]
It works now: Freenet 0.7 Build #779 r9029. Thanks a lot.
At FProxy Homepage I see the following text: "No peers found [..]".
I don't know how to get Freenet up and running from this point. I didn't
Hi all,
Try reinstalling. There is a new installer that may not have this
problem. [..]
It works now: Freenet 0.7 Build #779 r9029. Thanks a lot.
At FProxy Homepage I see the following text: No peers found [..].
I don't know how to get Freenet up and running from this point. I didn't
find
Try reinstalling. There is a new installer that may not have this
problem. There was a bug in the JVM, forcing the JVM to use pthreads was
the only known workaround for a while, but we have other workarounds now
and so have disabled that one. If the problem still persists then
occasionally your
Hello,
This is my first post to this mailing-list. I have used Freenet in the
past (version 0.5).
I just installed Freenet 0.7 using freenet-webinstall for linux. I am
not able to run Fred out of the box. I hope you could help me.
I think that the best thing I could do, is supply technical
Try reinstalling. There is a new installer that may not have this
problem. There was a bug in the JVM, forcing the JVM to use pthreads was
the only known workaround for a while, but we have other workarounds now
and so have disabled that one. If the problem still persists then
occasionally your
It's a known bug. :(
You can install the code manually; you need freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar and
freenet-ext.jar from http://downloads.freenetproject.org/
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:50:36AM -0700, Shoey Fighter wrote:
> Hello, thanks for the reply.
>
> I tired as you suggested (downloading the jar
Hello, thanks for the reply.
I tired as you suggested (downloading the jar to my machine and then
running java -jar), which did allow the installer to run.
However, once the installer got past the configuration and to the
actual install part of it, it failed with the following message
popping
Hello, thanks for the reply.
I tired as you suggested (downloading the jar to my machine and then
running java -jar), which did allow the installer to run.
However, once the installer got past the configuration and to the
actual install part of it, it failed with the following message
popping
It's a known bug. :(
You can install the code manually; you need freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar and
freenet-ext.jar from http://downloads.freenetproject.org/
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:50:36AM -0700, Shoey Fighter wrote:
Hello, thanks for the reply.
I tired as you suggested (downloading the jar to
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:00:43PM -0700, Shoey Fighter wrote:
> Hello. I am having some troubles installing Freenet 0.7 onto my Fedora
> 5 machine. I am fairly new to linux, so please bear with me.
>
> I installed the Sun JVM, but I might have screwed something up.
> Anyway, here is my
> java
Hello. I am having some troubles installing Freenet 0.7 onto my Fedora
5 machine. I am fairly new to linux, so please bear with me.
I installed the Sun JVM, but I might have screwed something up.
Anyway, here is my
java -version:
java version "1.5.0_06"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Hello. I am having some troubles installing Freenet 0.7 onto my Fedora
5 machine. I am fairly new to linux, so please bear with me.
I installed the Sun JVM, but I might have screwed something up.
Anyway, here is my
java -version:
java version 1.5.0_06
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
501 - 552 of 552 matches
Mail list logo
