Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1066

2007-11-02 Thread Malkus Lindroos
Matthew Toseland wrote: > Maybe. What would the benefit be? Isn't it a good thing to have a fairly > homogenous topology, rather than automatically creating ubernodes? > It would enable a node to be connected to both nets at the same time effectively (about 30 connections each). These kinds of

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1066

2007-11-01 Thread Malkus Lindroos
Just noticed that I completely lost connection to opennet in all of my nodes. At the same time transfer rates dropped + the network stopped finding stuff as fast as previously. Definitely a negative change. My nodes got completely cut off from opennet, so they are no longer able to work as bridges

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1066

2007-11-01 Thread Malkus Lindroos
Just noticed that I completely lost connection to opennet in all of my nodes. At the same time transfer rates dropped + the network stopped finding stuff as fast as previously. Definitely a negative change. My nodes got completely cut off from opennet, so they are no longer able to work as bridges

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1066

2007-10-26 Thread Malkus Lindroos
Matthew Toseland wrote: > Maybe. What would the benefit be? Isn't it a good thing to have a fairly > homogenous topology, rather than automatically creating ubernodes? > It would enable a node to be connected to both nets at the same time effectively (about 30 connections each). These kinds of

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1066

2007-10-24 Thread [Anon] Anon User
This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the F.L.U.G. (Firenze Linux User Group) mixminion server at firenze.linux.it. If you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact antani- admin at firenze.linux.it. For more information about anonymity, see https://remailer.firenze.l

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1066

2007-10-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
Maybe. What would the benefit be? Isn't it a good thing to have a fairly homogenous topology, rather than automatically creating ubernodes? On Wednesday 24 October 2007 06:00, [Anon] Anon User wrote: > > In Matthew Toseland wrote: > >Freenet 0.7 build 1066 is available. It will be mandatory on

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1066

2007-10-24 Thread [Anon] Anon User
This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the F.L.U.G. (Firenze Linux User Group) mixminion server at firenze.linux.it. If you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact antani- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information about anonymity, see https://remailer.firenze.linux.it

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1066

2007-10-24 Thread Derek Adams
I'm currently running a node on a 10Mbit trunk w/ 10G of cache space. Do you think it would be beneficial for those of us who have the resources available to contribute them, even if it does result in ubernodes? -Derek Matthew Toseland wrote: > Maybe. What would the benefit be? Isn't it a good

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1066

2007-10-24 Thread Derek Adams
I'm currently running a node on a 10Mbit trunk w/ 10G of cache space. Do you think it would be beneficial for those of us who have the resources available to contribute them, even if it does result in ubernodes? -Derek Matthew Toseland wrote: > Maybe. What would the benefit be? Isn't it a good

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1066

2007-10-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
Maybe. What would the benefit be? Isn't it a good thing to have a fairly homogenous topology, rather than automatically creating ubernodes? On Wednesday 24 October 2007 06:00, [Anon] Anon User wrote: > > In Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Freenet 0.7 build 1066 is available. It w

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1066

2007-10-24 Thread [Anon] Anon User
This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the F.L.U.G. (Firenze Linux User Group) mixminion server at firenze.linux.it. If you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact antani- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information about anonymity, see https://remailer.firenze.linux.it

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1066

2007-10-24 Thread [Anon] Anon User
This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the F.L.U.G. (Firenze Linux User Group) mixminion server at firenze.linux.it. If you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact antani- admin at firenze.linux.it. For more information about anonymity, see https://remailer.firenze.l

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1066

2007-10-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
Freenet 0.7 build 1066 is available. It will be mandatory on the 30th of October. It includes some fairly large changes including: - Merge of JFK, a Summer of Code project to implement a new, better link encryption setup protocol (we were using a form of STS). - The opennet peers limit takes into

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1066

2007-10-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
Freenet 0.7 build 1066 is available. It will be mandatory on the 30th of October. It includes some fairly large changes including: - Merge of JFK, a Summer of Code project to implement a new, better link encryption setup protocol (we were using a form of STS). - The opennet peers limit takes into