Can't we all just get along?
Newsbyte maintains the freenethelp.org site, right? Isn't that enough of
a contribution to render his opinions (however blunt they may be)
welcome? For that matter, shouldn't opinions be welcome regardless of
contribution?
These questions are not directed at anyone
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 08:42:10AM -0600, S wrote:
Give it a fucking rest, already, and let's get back to making Freenet
better.
That is just the problem. Newsbyte's core argument is that the ONLY way
to make Freenet better is to abandon Freenet and implement something
completely different (oh
There can be more than one reason.
Yes, but reasons 'afterwards' are always easily found (and even believed by
themselves). It's called 'to rationalise'. The reason why it actually got
deleted, is the reason first given in the email, which was based on an
emotional tit-for-tat reaction, and is
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:24:23PM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
There can be more than one reason.
Yes, but reasons 'afterwards' are always easily found (and even believed by
themselves). It's called 'to rationalise'. The reason why it actually got
deleted, is the reason first given in the email,
Jesus,
If anything gave me a bad taste in my mouth other than freenet's
terrible speed and reliablility, it's this current argument. Good luck in
the future, maybe I'll be back when this doesn't remind me of a
dysfunction family.
___
Support mailing
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:40:10PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, so I tried Freenet... or rather, I'm trying to try it.
It's running for about 36 hours now, with pauses because I have to go offline
every 12 hours. (is that a problem?)
Not if it's a brief offline.
A Freenet site
Motion to ban as a troll?
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:39:54AM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
So you're saying it should be faster? But even when I used the Freenet
gateways, they were very slow.
Actually, I was being sarcastic, which you may not have noticed, being a
newbie. If you scroll to my
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:53:58AM +, Clueless wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 01:39:54 +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
Actually, I was being sarcastic, which you may not have noticed, being a
newbie.
OIC. :-)
version. The version is one thing, the build something else. It should be
5100 (you can
What you actually said was, in your own annoying paste style:
Frustrating? Can't be! It has much improved, *much* I say. If you don't
believe me, ask toad and Ian!Even the simulations say so! We have NIO
and
NGR now, so things definately have improved for noobs like you, whatever
you
may think
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:19:59PM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
My critism is related to the performance and way of development of Freenet.
In both instances, I have given constructive suggestions too, but you deny
that. And even this time, I said changing to UDP might help with the
firewall issue,
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:58:28AM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
Well, phillip, see my other post for your remarks, but I would wanna say
specifically one thing:
* I don't like person (frequently Ian)
Isn't true. I NEVER contend it's the person, as individual, that I dislike,
I dislike the
-Original Message-
From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 2, 2004 12:07 PM
To: Newsbyte [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Is it always this slow?
Motion to ban as a troll?
Opposed. Free speech for all, even soreheads. Call it vigorous debate
Saying freenet sucks, it's gotten worse, it'll never get better, and
implying that this is because of the people building it, is not helpful.
Saying and implying it to newbies when we are particularly vulnerable
due to our slow initial performance due to freenet taking a while to
learn where stuff
as a tester probably
doesn't
help much.
[Original Message]
From: vinyl1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 12/2/2004 2:27:11 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Is it always this slow?
-Original Message-
From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 2, 2004 12:07 PM
: Nicholas Sturm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vinyl1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 12/2/2004 4:47:14 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Is it always this slow?
Actually I would not even want access to someone's server -- too much
responsibility.
But I've not been
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 09:05:05PM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
Saying freenet sucks, it's gotten worse, it'll never get better, and
implying that this is because of the people building it, is not helpful.
Saying and implying it to newbies when we are particularly vulnerable
due to our slow initial
Is that good or bad? Interestingly, even that many connections use very
little of my bandwidth.
It's rather good. It's way more then my average Open connections, and it
indicates that it's not really a firewall/NAT problem.
BTW, how big should the cache, or 'store' be? I guess the 300 MB I've
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:05:00 +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
300MB is very little, to be honest. But of course it depends on the size of
your HD. Normally, it is (should be) set to 10% of your free HD-space.
The default was 256MB, but the HD I installed Freenet on only had 1 GB free...
Now, may I ask you
On 1 Dec 2004, at 10:05, Newsbyte wrote:
Now, may I ask you if you feel I have helped/supported you with my
posts? I
ask that, because I just got emailed by Ian saying he kicked me out of
the
project (well, at least he disabled my freenetproject account)
I wasn't aware that you were ever in the
I wasn't aware that you were ever in the project to be kicked out of
it (whatever being in the project means). Very few people have
@freenetproject.org email addresses, you got one because you asked for
it and because you said it would help you raise donations for the
project.
That was one
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 15:19:59 +0100, Newsbyte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut for brevity]
In my time watching this list, which is well over a year now, I don't
actually recall you making a valid contribution to the project. I do
tend to read your emails, though it can be a struggle at times, and
all
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 01:58:28 +0100, Newsbyte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, phillip, see my other post for your remarks, but I would wanna say
specifically one thing:
* I don't like person (frequently Ian)
Isn't true. I NEVER contend it's the person, as individual, that I dislike,
I
OK, so I tried Freenet... or rather, I'm trying to try it.
It's running for about 36 hours now, with pauses because I have to go offline
every 12 hours. (is that a problem?)
A Freenet site takes now from 5 to 20 minutes to load, if it loads at all.
After much trying, I downloaded Frost, but the
OK, so I tried Freenet... or rather, I'm trying to try it.
It's running for about 36 hours now, with pauses because I have to go
offline
every 12 hours. (is that a problem?)
A Freenet site takes now from 5 to 20 minutes to load, if it loads at all.
After much trying, I downloaded Frost, but the
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 00:27:44 +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
Frustrating? Can't be! It has much improved, *much* I say. If you don't
believe me, ask toad and Ian!Even the simulations say so! We have NIO and
NGR now, so things definately have improved for noobs like you, whatever you
may think about it
So you're saying it should be faster? But even when I used the Freenet
gateways, they were very slow.
Actually, I was being sarcastic, which you may not have noticed, being a
newbie. If you scroll to my earlier posts on devl or support, you will
notice I've made EXACTLY the point that for noobs
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 01:39:54 +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
Actually, I was being sarcastic, which you may not have noticed, being a
newbie.
OIC. :-)
version. The version is one thing, the build something else. It should be
5100 (you can see that when you open fproxy), which it probably is.
Yes it is.
27 matches
Mail list logo
