5 and 0, 7]
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:54:12 -0400, you wrote:
>
> If you pester anyone too much it can be self defeating. Perhaps
> unintentionally as they consume much time deleting your messages from their
> files. Or intentionally if they choose to block the excesses traffic.
Tell you
If you pester anyone too much it can be self defeating. Perhaps
unintentionally as they consume much time deleting your messages from their
files. Or intentionally if they choose to block the excesses traffic.
>
> "We should all start pestering the hell outta both Ian and Toad to get
open-net
This is not true. A global darknet is feasible, as I have explained:
National barriers, and even language barriers are by no means absolute,
and to the extent that they affect the network they can be dealt with.
If Freenet provides something of value, we can make a large darknet.
AND IF IT ISN'T
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Through the opennet. Which won't exist for, like, a year.
Hmmm.
On 8/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node
This is not true. A global darknet is feasible, as I have explained:
National barriers, and even language barriers are by no means absolute,
and to the extent that they affect the network they can be dealt with.
If Freenet provides something of value, we can make a large darknet.
AND IF IT ISN'T
If you pester anyone too much it can be self defeating. Perhaps
unintentionally as they consume much time deleting your messages from their
files. Or intentionally if they choose to block the excesses traffic.
We should all start pestering the hell outta both Ian and Toad to get
open-net
5 and 0, 7]
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:54:12 -0400, you wrote:
If you pester anyone too much it can be self defeating. Perhaps
unintentionally as they consume much time deleting your messages from their
files. Or intentionally if they choose to block the excesses traffic.
Tell you
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext
In <35af28770608261648v10edeb06mee2478eebf1be3b0 at mail.gmail.com> urza9814 at
gmail.com wrote:
>Through the opennet. Which won't exist for, like, a year.
>Hmmm.
>
>On 8/26/06, diddler4u at hotmail.com wrote:
>> >>Freenet
