RE: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Please help: seednode sources

2004-01-14 Thread Nicholas Sturm
I am running stable with 5058. I got the new node set at 5054, but I'm not at all sure those node are all stable (have my doubts). [Original Message] From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 1/14/2004 3:16:32 PM Subject:

RE: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Please help: seednode sources

2004-01-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i have seen some stable nodes with connections to unstable nodes, unstable nodes with connections to stable nodes, seednodes for stable nodes with unstable references, seednodes for unstable nodes with stable references, you get the idea. why are stable nodes connecting AT ALL to unstable

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Please help: seednode sources

2004-01-14 Thread Toad
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:06:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have seen some stable nodes with connections to unstable nodes, unstable nodes with connections to stable nodes, seednodes for stable nodes with unstable references, seednodes for unstable nodes with stable references,

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Please help: seednode sources

2004-01-14 Thread Toad
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:06:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have seen some stable nodes with connections to unstable nodes, unstable nodes with connections to stable nodes, seednodes for stable nodes with unstable references, seednodes for unstable nodes with stable references,

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Please help: seednode sources

2004-01-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why not have some sanity checks when importing seed files or adding node = refs to the routing table? we'll all be luckier with this and in the long r= un the generated seednode files are much less polluted (why aren't=20 We do. oh, good :) then wrong noderefs can only slip into the rt when

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Please help: seednode sources

2004-01-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
then wrong noderefs can only slip into the rt when the local rt already h= as these bad references (e.g. when switching von unstable-stable or the ot= her way around without purging the rt) or when importing new=20 seednodes which contain these bad refs. =20 would it be useful if the local

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Please help: seednode sources

2004-01-14 Thread Toad
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:43:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: then wrong noderefs can only slip into the rt when the local rt already h= as these bad references (e.g. when switching von unstable-stable or the ot= her way around without purging the rt) or when importing new=20 seednodes

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Please help: seednode sources

2004-01-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
when the node starts up, the rt gets cleaned, so no bad refs are left. then, while the node is running only good refs are added to the rt. =20 then why are connections from incompatible (e.g. stable/unstable) nodes i= n the OCM? because they contacted us? then why aren't they rejected for