[freenet-support] FEC frost is done, but..

2003-01-30 Thread Zlatin Balevsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. as I said Jantho hasn't replied to me for few days, I'm getting worried (yeah CIA FBI etc.). The code for FEC frost release is in cvs, but just in case I put two links to keys in freenet on the third party tools on the website. Hope you gu

[freenet-support] test

2003-01-30 Thread John McCain
The web management for this list is broken. I cannot unsubscribe from this list. Forced to come up with ways to forcibly unsubscribe myself from this list, I am testing my efforts. ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetprojec

Re: [freenet-support] DoS

2003-01-30 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 11:57:25PM +0100, Sascha Wüstemann wrote: > Hi, > > thank you so much for answering my questions! > I really do feel better now and will continue sharing my computer for > freenet, which I am convinced of, is a pretty much good invention! > > > mentioned). Will your load d

Re: [freenet-support] DoS

2003-01-30 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:38:32PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > Sascha Wüstemann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > I haven't reniced it, because I think it consumes it's cpu time it > > needs, so if fiddling with it, I would loose contact, right? Would using > > a different freenet file system dec

Re: [freenet-support] DoS

2003-01-30 Thread Greg Wooledge
Sascha Wüstemann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I haven't reniced it, because I think it consumes it's cpu time it > needs, so if fiddling with it, I would loose contact, right? Would using > a different freenet file system decrease cpu usage leading to less load? If you only have a 350 MB data sto

Re: [freenet-support] ARKs are amazing

2003-01-30 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 03:32:47PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I must admit ARKs have totally changed the behaviour of my node. Before it > would take up to a day for a fresh install to start receiving incomming > requests, now it takes minutes. > > Way to go!! Technically, it wasn't t

Re: [freenet-support] DoS

2003-01-30 Thread Sascha =?unknown-8bit?q?W=FCstemann?=
Hi, thank you so much for answering my questions! I really do feel better now and will continue sharing my computer for freenet, which I am convinced of, is a pretty much good invention! > mentioned). Will your load decrease if you shut down Frost for an hour or > two? Load immediately decreases

Re: [freenet-support] DoS

2003-01-30 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:01:10AM +0100, Sascha Wüstemann wrote: > Hi all, > > running freenet for the comunity, is primarily used for frost, here. > > Frost is currently at a Denial of Service attack and since then, I am > watching a lot of more connections to my node than before and downloads

Re: [freenet-support] DoS

2003-01-30 Thread Niklas Bergh
Sascha The way freenet is built noone can do a direct DoS attack within freenet. Whenever anyone is DosS:ing all of the nodes in freenet will share to load. I personally think that your log file looks just fine, it is completely normal for some connections to die now and then, it is also quite nor

Re: [freenet-support] DoS

2003-01-30 Thread Sascha =?unknown-8bit?q?W=FCstemann?=
Hi all, excuse me, but I am not willing to run freenet again, until one has answered my question for my security. This is an urgent question about running it, not how to get it run, so plz answer my question. As the whole thing is lacking of documentation, I do expect my question to be answered.

[freenet-support] ARKs are amazing

2003-01-30 Thread zbalevsk
___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

[freenet-support] ARKs are amazing

2003-01-30 Thread zbalevsk
I must admit ARKs have totally changed the behaviour of my node. Before it would take up to a day for a fresh install to start receiving incomming requests, now it takes minutes. Way to go!! ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.fr

[freenet-support] Another FEC problem

2003-01-30 Thread Niklas Bergh
I was downloading a large FEC-splitfile and had configured the splitfile servelet to heal 20% of the missing blocks with HTL 20 When the download of segment #1 was done (there where more than enough blocks available to reconstruct the segment) I was met with an error message saying something like

[freenet-support] Native FEC support

2003-01-30 Thread Gianni Johansson
I noticed that some people on the support list are struggling with Native FEC support. The Nubile info on Native FEC support is completly obsolete. Look here instead: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/freenet/Contrib/fecimpl/onion/README?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup

RE: [freenet-support] Assertion failed in v551

2003-01-30 Thread Niklas Bergh
Same thing in v552. /N ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

RE: [freenet-support] Native FEC support

2003-01-30 Thread Niklas Bergh
>But when I start up freenet I get this: > >java.io.IOException: Couldn't get FECEncoder: OnionFEC_a_1_2 > at freenet.client.FECTools.getEncoder(FECTools.java:643) > at freenet.client.FECTools.segmentFile(FECTools.java:166) > at >freenet.node.states.FCP.NewFECSegmentFile.received(

[freenet-support] EXCELLENT CAREER OPPORTUNITIES IN DUBAI

2003-01-30 Thread DCVM.com DUBAI

[freenet-support] Assertion failed in v551

2003-01-30 Thread Niklas Bergh
Found this in the console window: ---Unexpected Exception-- java.lang.RuntimeException: Assertion failed. at freenet.client.RequestManager.assertTrue(RequestManager.java:352) at freenet.client.RequestManager.handleDone(RequestManager.java:85) at freenet.clie