On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:01:25 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet
properly. Are you sure you need another wrapper around that
wrapper? :)
My freenet stopped again, in spite of
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly.
Are you sure you need another wrapper around that wrapper? :)
I do not know much about the freenet internals, so I do
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:52:48 +, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet
properly. Are you sure you need another
On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:13:41 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:01:25 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet
properly. Are you sure you need another wrapper around
On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:52:48 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly.
Are you sure you need another wrapper around that
On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:30, bqz69 wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:52:48 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet
properly.
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:40, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:22:52 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 16:56:16 Dennis Nezic wrote:
Do you have the
most recent freenet-ext.jar?
Yes
Here is my newest wrapper log from 6. jan 2009:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
> > But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly.
> > Are you sure you need another wrapper around that wrapper? :)
My freenet stopped again, in spite of my .crontab, here is the wrapper.log
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:01:25 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
> > > But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet
> > > properly. Are you sure you need another wrapper around that
> > > wrapper? :)
>
> My freenet stopped again, in spite of my
nf:
wrapper.restart.delay=5
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090108/53eff297/attachment.pgp>
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:52:48 +, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
> > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
> > > > But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet
> > > > properly. Are you sure you need another wrapper around
On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:13:41 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:01:25 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
> > > > But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet
> > > > properly. Are you sure you need another wrapper around that
On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:52:48 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
> > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
> > > > But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly.
> > > > Are you sure you need another wrapper around
; I already done that some time ago after your instructions, thanks
Then it's a wrapper bug...
But there is probably also a bug in the node...
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090108/a16288cf/attachment.pgp>
uldn't happen as they should start at maximum priority,
and the FEC decode thread for example should start at near minimum.
But there may be other causes.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size:
15 matches
Mail list logo