Re: [freenet-support] pb connecting gpl.txt on freenet & few questions
blured blured ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > a nude female and a text explaining ssk is not secure is it a fake ? SSK? Really? Not KSK? If so, you've found a gpl.txt variant I haven't seen yet. But I suspect it's more likely you misunderstood the content of the text, which was trying to tell you why [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not a secure key. > Hops To Live: 15 > Error: Data not found Patience. > 3) if Install freenet is my node publicaly available ? Do I need special > configuration to make that works or is it made by default ? If you said "yes" when you were asked about being a transient node, then your node is transient and won't serve data to other nodes. If you said "no" (or took the default) then you have a real node. (Assuming of course that you are not firewalled. If you are, then that mostly explains your problems.) And since you got a DNF, it means you're actually talking to other nodes. Keep trying, or get some seed node references from someone whose node is having better luck than yours. > freenet:SSK@WeOtwjh~dJSRKJhKDKtCvSXHjP0PAgM/prout// I can't see it yet, but keep trying. Be sure to insert your URL into TFE's submission thing, because that's the best way to advertise your site to the major Freenet sites (TFE, Raw Freedom, Cruft, etc.). It could take a few days before people start to get your site, especially if your node is badly connected (lots of DNF and RNF). Again, patience. And good luck. -- Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody." [EMAIL PROTECTED] |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | msg01239/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[freenet-support] pb connecting gpl.txt on freenet & few questions
Hi, Just trying to run freenet 0.4 on winXP with jre 1.3.1. Here are some results and questions : 1) I manage only once to get the welcome test page with gpl.txt, however I'd got a jpeg pic with a nude female and a text explaining ssk is not secure is it a fake ? 2) the others time I'd got an error : << Network Error Couldn't retrieve key: Hops To Live: 15 Error: Data not found Change Hops To Live >> 3) if Install freenet is my node publicaly available ? Do I need special configuration to make that works or is it made by default ? 4) I didn't manage to get the search engines dedicated to freenet ... Always got this error : << Network Error Couldn't retrieve key: Hops To Live: 15 Error: Data not found Change Hops To Live >> 5) I published a site by freeweb ... the key is : secure --> freenet:SSK@WeOtwjh~dJSRKJhKDKtCvSXHjP0PAgM/prout// insecure --> freenet:KSK@freeweb/prout// does anybody manage to see it ? (I typed http://localhost:/SSK@WeOtwjh~dJSRKJhKDKtCvSXHjP0PAgM/prout//) See ya, blured. _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] sending keepalive-packets through connections
Ephrim Khong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Are you sure that it's technically required to be able to accept > incoming connections? For full details, you should review the list archives for the development list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). What it comes down to (as far as I understand it) is this: 1) Your node wants to find a key. 2) Your node looks through its list of other nodes and chooses one to ask for this key. It makes a TCP connection. 3) If the other node has the key, great. You get it. You win. 4) But if the other node doesn't have it, it will have to go looking for it, which could take a long time. It will disconnect from you if it doesn't find it within some time frame. 5) If the other node finds the key, it will try to connect to you and give it to you. 6) If the other node doesn't find the key, it will try to connect to you and give you the disappointing news. If any developers are reading this, and I screwed up, please correct me. Preferably using simple English and small words, because we're a bit dumb over here on the support@ list. ;-) > I had some some 15 connections after browsing through some sites, when > suddenly one connection after the other closed down until none was left. > My traffic monitor didn't indicate any traffic, and I (think I) know that > the SOCKS proxy closes connections that were idle for some time. Then your proxy might be exacerbating the problems that NAT are causing. In any case, it looks like using Freenet will be a pretty miserable experience for you with the current codebase. But I still don't understand how you are actually *using* SOCKS5 in the context of Freenet. Are you sure you aren't simply using NAT? (E.g., if you turn off the NAT and leave only the SOCKS5 proxy, does Freenet work at all for keys that aren't already in your data store?) -- Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody." [EMAIL PROTECTED] |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | msg01237/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] sending keepalive-packets through connections
>Ephrim Khong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> I am trying to use freenet behind a Firewall, using a SOCKS5 Proxy >> server. > > How, exactly? Freenet requires the ability to receive incoming > connections on at least one TCP port. If you have a way to achieve > that using SOCKS5 we'd love to hear about it, and add it to the FAQ. Are you sure that it's technically required to be able to accept incoming connections? I am quite sure that my computer is not able to do so. I only have a LAN-IP, and the only way to contact the web is through a HTTP/FTP/SOCKS Proxy server. I am using SocksCap (http://www.socks.nec.com/reference/sockscap.html) to acess the SOCKS-Proxy. I know that freenet works, since I can download websites. I had some some 15 connections after browsing through some sites, when suddenly one connection after the other closed down until none was left. My traffic monitor didn't indicate any traffic, and I (think I) know that the SOCKS proxy closes connections that were idle for some time. >> It works, but the Proxy is closing any ideling TCP-Connection, if >> there was no data send through it for some time. > > > > Is this a transient node or something? How can your node be that idle? > Most of us who run nodes get slammed pretty consistently by traffic, > although there are a few exceptional cases where nodes get very light > traffic (and nobody knows why). The node is set to transient, yes. eph ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] sending keepalive-packets through connections
Ephrim Khong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I am trying to use freenet behind a Firewall, using a SOCKS5 Proxy > server. How, exactly? Freenet requires the ability to receive incoming connections on at least one TCP port. If you have a way to achieve that using SOCKS5 we'd love to hear about it, and add it to the FAQ. > It works, but the Proxy is closing any ideling TCP-Connection, if > there was no data send through it for some time. Is this a transient node or something? How can your node be that idle? Most of us who run nodes get slammed pretty consistently by traffic, although there are a few exceptional cases where nodes get very light traffic (and nobody knows why). -- Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody." [EMAIL PROTECTED] |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | msg01235/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[freenet-support] [NEWBEE] TempDir needs to be SET !
Title: Message How do I get around this FECTemDir thingie ? Or could the problem be something else. I am able to access the 8890 port but not ?!! Just installed Freenet. Problem: Gateway not opening LOG Message: (freenet.node.Main, main): WARNING: FECTempDir not set in freenet.conf/ini! Checked the corresponding entry in the freenet.ini file it starts with a "%" sign and isn't that supposed to ignore everything on that line and use defaults? System: Win 98 J2SE installed Freenet latest version installed -Kunal Walia
[freenet-support] sending keepalive-packets through connections
Hi, I am trying to use freenet behind a Firewall, using a SOCKS5 Proxy server. It works, but the Proxy is closing any ideling TCP-Connection, if there was no data send through it for some time. Is there any option to send some keepalive-packages (I think it doesn't have to be more than 1 bytes/minute) through all opened connections, so they don't get closed by the proxy? thanks, eph ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
