j ai bien mon petit lapin mais il est barre j ai du
me planter a l installe et en anglais je suis nul avez vous des explications d
installation en français merci Philippe
So how *do* you get freenet 0.5 kick started on Linux?
Both kaffe 1.0.5 and jre 1.1.8 give the same error:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java/io/File.getAbsoluteFile()Ljava/io/File;
at freenet.node.Main.main(Main.java:341)
The documentation is not at all helpful here.
Rick ter Schele ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So how *do* you get freenet 0.5 kick started on Linux?
Both kaffe 1.0.5 and jre 1.1.8 give the same error:
Neither of those will work.
Kaffe version 1.0.7 will work, and Sun Java 1.3 or 1.4 will work.
IBM Java may work. I wouldn't hold my breath
At 07.01 29/10/02 -0500, you wrote:
Currently rel-0-5-1 has it
[...]
A word of warning to people who may try this: port 8889 is GONE. The
node status stuff has been merged into port .
What about distribution port ?
Better, what about distribution service ???
Ciao. Marco
--
+ il
Hi,
Does freenet support os9? if not, will the new version?
tx,
Swerve
http://Swerve.com
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
In message 003c01c27f1f$aa562040$4158fea9@comtechs2, Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I ran a scan on my PC with 4 different scanners., i checked my out box, for
unusual e-mail attachments. and im clean.
if this be the case, how did this happen???
good ol kletz was i forged? or did i get the bug? i
Greetings,
Checking my node this morning, (after waiting for top to come up, swap swap swap) I
found I had some 155 java
processes going. Any way to control this? Right now I can either run a node or work,
not both. Maxnodeconnections
seems to have no effect on the number of connections the
If there is going to be another watchme network in the future, I would
prefer instead to simply have a seperate watchme java app. that I can run
beside freenet that will spy on my node and report back.
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My node seems to be humming along at 4% load (indicated on nodestatus
report). I've been up two days and have 2000+ inbound connections reported
from 78 nodes. my store is at 2 gigs and growing.
groovy.
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
After upgrading to build 603, I'm no longer able to save freesites with
Mozilla - not even the fproxy gateway page. Save Page As ... pops up
a message window The link could not be saved. The web page might have
been removed or had its name changed.
Another possible fproxy bug: loading the
Hello Support,
I believe I followed the instructions on the download page, but can't
make anything happen. I'm using Mac OS 10.2.1 with the Chimera 0.5
(Navigator) browser.
Any clues?
Best regards,
Benton Kimura
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site: http://www.bentonkimura.com
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 03:17:07PM +0100, Anonymous wrote:
[fproxy bugs in build 603]
Same for release 0.5.0.1 (build 526).
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Mike wrote:
so php scripting will not work for me then ??
No.
guess that means i am gonna have to just make static pages here... lol
If you don't have any complex php scripts (like bulletin boards), you can
run your pages thru the php parser, fix the links and upload the
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, R Allen wrote:
I have installed and attempted to use the latest version of FreeNet, and
have a few questions.
First, the Readme file states there is presently no search function for the
system. What good is the system without a search function ?
It still provides
I was wondering. If I use update.sh do I get the -stable branch or the
development branch?
Would it be useful to have a switch? e.g. update.sh -d gets you the
developement branch. Then if it didn't work out I could use update.sh
-s to get back to the latest stable release.
Rob.
--
I don't think the worm got past my virus checker, but it was in much of the mail from the support site the past two days. The description of how to remove it from the registry (if it did get that far, is beyond the capacity of a simple user).
--- Nicholas Sturm
--- Mail checked with Norton
I wanted to write and tell you how displeased I am
with your software. I installed it and it is cumbersome to use. It
is being touted as a P2P app. This does not appear to be the case.
Never could figure it out. I made the BIG mistake of setting my directory
to the "My Shared Folder" for
Now if you'll calm down... you can read my comments or scroll to the bottom
for the 'summarised' answer.
I wanted to write and tell you how displeased I am with your software.
I installed it and it is cumbersome to use. It is being touted as a
P2P app.
NOT BY US. You have been, ehm,
Similar to my previous message, but new errors in
my logs.
29-Oct-02 17:57:55
(freenet.node.ds.FSDataStoreElement
$KeyInputStreamImpl, Finalizer): Please close() me
manually in finalizer: Key:
9a386f0597dd9d2a9afb7bf35a1d473692d050b50f0203
Buffer: freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory
why isn't freenet p2p?
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To follow on from this here's a sample of the logfile - is this normal?
vletContainer, QThread-32): I/O error in servlet
29-Oct-2002 18:20:38 (freenet.interfaces.servlet.MultipleHttpServletContainer,
QThread-48): I/O error in servlet
29-Oct-2002
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:51:25AM -0600, Robert Carroll wrote:
If there is going to be another watchme network in the future, I would
prefer instead to simply have a seperate watchme java app. that I can run
beside freenet that will spy on my node and report back.
No way, we can't spy on the
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:47:42AM -0500, Doug Bostrom wrote:
Greetings,
Checking my node this morning, (after waiting for top to come up, swap swap swap) I
found I had some 155 java
processes going. Any way to control this? Right now I can either run a node or work,
not both.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:45:16AM -0600, Joseph Chiaia wrote:
I wanted to write and tell you how displeased I am with your software. I installed
it and it is cumbersome to use. It is being touted as a P2P app. This does not
appear to be the case. Never could figure it out. I made the BIG
just wanted to better understand why I don't seem to have problems with my
node:
Version Information
Node Version 0.5
Protocol Version 1.46
Build Number 525
CVS Revision 1.85.2.3
the load is between 2-5%. I can rapidly connect to freesites.
is this happy circumstance caused by the version
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:55 pm, you wrote:
Use the bandwidth limiter to prevent it swamping your connection. It is
expected to use lots (up to 120) threads - they should normally be
almost all idling. The current situation is a product of the network
being slashdotted, and
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:23:19PM -0400, Doug Bostrom wrote:
On Monday 28 October 2002 08:30 am, you wrote:
Hmm. If you know what you are doing,
Aye, there's the rub! But going back to original question, if a 6xx node is
running ok, aside from nonfatal developmental bugs, will it lend
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 04:58:00PM -0400, Doug Bostrom wrote:
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:55 pm, you wrote:
Use the bandwidth limiter to prevent it swamping your connection. It is
expected to use lots (up to 120) threads - they should normally be
almost all idling. The current
Similar problem - I am seeing a vast number of open sockets - all listening
on bound to 0.0.0.0:8481 and listening for connections - but not seeing any
traffic.
Surely there should only be one socket open listening on that port?
I also seem to be seeing extremely low transfer rates on all of
but 525 seems to be working fine. should those users who are experiencing
no difficulties w/ 525 update to 0502?
At 10:09 PM 10/29/2002 +, you wrote:
Freenet 0.5.0.2 is now available for download. Please upgrade to this
version, and inform us of any problems. This includes some important
load
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 02:35:57PM -0700, colbyd wrote:
but 525 seems to be working fine. should those users who are experiencing
no difficulties w/ 525 update to 0502?
WORKING FINE? Nobody I have talked to has described freenet as working
fine in the last 24 hours. 527 has vitally important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just updated to 527 and this is still vulnerable. Here's the HTML output I get for
going to the URL below:
html
head
title Couldn't retrieve
scriptdocument.write('test1H1test2/H1');/script/title
/head
body bgcolor=#ff
h1Unexpected key/h1
pKey:
is there a down load??
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
what about mac os 9???
--
mfg.
Arno Haipl
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
I count two other comments on the freenet board in frost that corroborate
my present experience w/ 525. Again, this is the version I'm using:
Version Information
Node Version 0.5
Protocol Version 1.46
Build Number 525
CVS Revision 1.85.2.3
By 'working fine' I mean that I can, with surprising
Swerve ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Does freenet support os9? if not, will the new version?
Freenet requires a working Java virtual machine, equivalent to Sun's
Java VM version 1.2 or later. (Actually, mostly 1.1 with just a few
1.2 classes -- Kaffe 1.0.7 is fine, for instance.)
If you can
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 12:45 pm, you wrote:
I wanted to write and tell you how displeased I am with your software. I
installed it and it is cumbersome to use. It is being touted as a P2P app.
This does not appear to be the case. Never could figure it out. I made
yadda-yadda
That has
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 05:09 pm, you wrote:
Freenet 0.5.0.2 is now available for download. Please upgrade to this
version, and inform us of any problems. This includes some important
load balancing code that should help the network to get out of the dire
state it is in following Monday's
FProxy performance from a nonlocal host is still terrible, while local host
FProxy access is much better. My node is still swamped with connections,
although the bandwidth usage is well below my bandwidth limiter settings. I
did upgrade to the latest snapshot, but I didn't reinstall with the web
Hmm, that's EXACTLY what my node says before the so-called fix. And I've
just reproduced EXACTLY the same behaviour again on the current
freenet-latest.jar. However it DOES appear to be fixed in the latest
freenet-unstable-latest.jar (603 I believe)
Someone care to rerelease the 5xx branch with
Hi guys,
I don't know if XSS is an issue with Freenet .. but here goes - the
following executes custom html.
http://127.0.0.1:/%3Cscript%3Edocument.write('test');%3C/script%3E
Hope it helps.
--
Kind Regards,
Obscure
http://eyeonsecurity.org/
http://ob5cure.com/
the following executes custom html.
http://127.0.0.1:/%3Cscript%3Edocument.write('test');%3C/script%3E
True - for example :
http://127.0.0.1:/%3Cscript%3Edocument.write('test1%3cH1%3etest2%3c/H1%3
e');%3C/script%3E
The code that displays the Unexpected key page should really HTMLise
the following executes custom html.
http://127.0.0.1:/%3Cscript%3Edocument.write('test');%3C/script%3E
True - for example :
http://127.0.0.1:/%3Cscript%3Edocument.write('test1%3cH1%3etest2%3c/H1%3
e');%3C/script%3E
The code that displays the Unexpected key page should really HTMLise
Is there any chance that the file times on the freenetproject.org server
could be converted from some obscure and unstated time zone (does it
have daylight saving, e.g.?) to UTC? Or at least that the deviation
from UTC could be stated? It might help to keep up with the almost
hourly updates
Ok, so I expected a massive lag due to slashdotting, but I still can't
get anywhere usefull.
I can get [EMAIL PROTECTED], (naked version). But I can't get anywhere else.
I've tried the 3 links from the start page (localhost:), and keep
getting Network Error: Data Not Found.
I've tried
Pipe still saturates. I cut maxthreads to 40, then 20. Connections stayed at 45,
pooled jobs at 98, java
processes somewhere over 100. Load at 90+.
Bandwidth adjustments via freenet.conf have zero effect.
OTH, I don't see in the support thread that others are having the same issue with
Replying to oneself,
I've upgraded to 0.5.0.2, and I've got to one site, The Freedom Engine,
yey! So that may have fixed atleast something.
However, I have one other question, this has occured in both Windows and
Linux, using Mozilla, Netscape 6, and Konqueror.
When I open half a dozen or so
At 05:31 PM 10/28/2002, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Pardon me if this is a stupid question, but I've been fighting Freenet for
the last 45 minutes trying to figure out exactly how to get at the Freenet
proxy from a different computer. The solutions in the FAQ and
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:41:06PM -0700, NoSpam wrote:
At 05:31 PM 10/28/2002, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Pardon me if this is a stupid question, but I've been fighting Freenet
for
the last 45 minutes trying to figure out exactly how to get at the
Freenet
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 12:42:55AM +, Roger Hayter wrote:
Is there any chance that the file times on the freenetproject.org server
could be converted from some obscure and unstated time zone (does it
have daylight saving, e.g.?) to UTC? Or at least that the deviation
from UTC could be
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:19:31PM -0500, Doug Bostrom wrote:
Pipe still saturates. I cut maxthreads to 40, then 20. Connections stayed at 45,
pooled jobs at 98, java
processes somewhere over 100. Load at 90+.
You did use the up to date start-freenet.sh, or nice -n 10 it directly?
That should
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:28:29PM -0800, Mike wrote:
i just updated to 527, and now im at 89-133% this time , it is dragging my
system to a crawl :P
bleh...
the fun starts.
Use the new start-freenet-sh, from the tarball. Or if in windoze, use
the new wininstaller.
- Original
I've got a firewall machine which I run my freenet node on, but generally I
wish to access fproxy by nodes on my private LAN. This works, however, I get
premature timeouts when accessing from the LAN. I use Konqueror to access
fproxy, but usually before I get the freesite or even a proper DNF
build 527 broke my frosty... AAHH!!!
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
10/29/02 9:59:00 PM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. The bandwidth limiter is not working then?
Not as far as I can tell, or least very little. I have bandwidth set to 8k both ways,
threads set to 20, and
I'm showing something like 200 processes right just now and my
after updating the freenet and changing my port back to I get the
following error in frost.:
java.net.connectexception:connection refused connect
AAHHH!!!
now, how can i fix this? do i need to totally reinstall .5 ?
- Original Message -
From: Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
57 matches
Mail list logo
