Of course, I didn't mean 100 GB per hour but 100 MB per hour!
__
Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193
___
48 hours should get tolerable performance on the current code... well,
for some. For others it can take a week. It's not really clear. The
current network takes too long to learn, that's one thing we're trying
to fix with the 0.7 rewrite. This is assuming you have the ability to
receive incoming
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 06:56:49PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I have managed to start a node on my vServer, but how can I control if and
how it runs? The stats-directory only contains a lot of files with numbers in
it.
And a few questions to the server: I don't know much
You can't. Transient is deprecated. Oh, and thanks.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 11:20:15PM +0200, DreamLander wrote:
I have a dial-up connection to the internet and I read that would be good
for the FreeNet to set from Node Availability to Node is transient.
My current setting is Node
Try running it in bash?
$ /bin/bash
$ source start-freenet.sh
...
?
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 07:57:45PM -0500, Robert Webber wrote:
Hello:
I am trying to run freenet on Solaris 10 (3/05) for Sparc.
I have downloaded the archive and validated that it is intact. When I
run freenet for the
This is on crazy-high-bandwidth?
Suggest you increase the messageStoreSize (this will use more RAM...) if
you want to get rid of the messages... otherwise, just make the node
handle less requests.
It is possible that this is due to a bug. But it's definitely some sort
of overload problem.
On
Hmmm. Don't know then...
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 09:47:17PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, I didn't mean 100 GB per hour but 100 MB per hour!
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible.
