robert fallis a ?crit :
> I've been away for a few weeks. and I now get a message to upgrade my node.
> my node is set to automatic update but it has not worked, How do I
> upgrade my node?
> help please
> bob
Depends on your operating system :
On Windows, your should have a shortcut to
robert fallis a écrit :
I've been away for a few weeks. and I now get a message to upgrade my node.
my node is set to automatic update but it has not worked, How do I
upgrade my node?
help please
bob
Depends on your operating system :
On Windows, your should have a shortcut to update.cmd.
bqz69 a ?crit :
> I am running freenet (ubuntu 8.04) on one box with no open ports, and also
> running freenet on another box with most of the ports mentioned in freenet
> opened - both boxes appears to run fine.
>
> I am using "Firestarter" as my "firewall" as I find it easy to use, only.
>
>
bqz69 a écrit :
I am running freenet (ubuntu 8.04) on one box with no open ports, and also
running freenet on another box with most of the ports mentioned in freenet
opened - both boxes appears to run fine.
I am using Firestarter as my firewall as I find it easy to use, only.
Now my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
> On Monday 04 August 2008 15:46, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
>> Ian Clarke a ?crit :
>>> Setting aside the fact that this guy is clearly an asshole, does
>>> anyone understand what problem he is run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland a écrit :
On Monday 04 August 2008 15:46, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
Ian Clarke a écrit :
Setting aside the fact that this guy is clearly an asshole, does
anyone understand what problem he is running into here?
Ian.
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Clarke a ?crit :
> Setting aside the fact that this guy is clearly an asshole, does
> anyone understand what problem he is running into here?
>
> Ian.
http://ungoth.com/blog/
His website has been viewed 85 times. I don't think we have to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robert fallis a ?crit :
> this is the error message I get while trying to install
>
> The full error message is :
> #
> An SSL exception has occured:java.lang.RuntimeException:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robert fallis a ?crit :
> On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 18:55 +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> robert fallis a ?crit :
>>
>>>>> Julien.
>>>>&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Hecht a ?crit :
> When using Darknet, are requests forwarded by friends that are not
> friends of your node?
>
> For example, if you are friends (via Darknet) with (person A) and
> (person B). And (person B) is friends with (person C) via
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robert fallis a écrit :
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 18:55 +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robert fallis a écrit :
Julien.
have changed permission, but still no joy I have what seams to be a
partly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robert fallis a écrit :
this is the error message I get while trying to install
The full error message is :
#
An SSL exception has occured:java.lang.RuntimeException: Unexpected
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Hecht a écrit :
When using Darknet, are requests forwarded by friends that are not
friends of your node?
For example, if you are friends (via Darknet) with (person A) and
(person B). And (person B) is friends with (person C) via
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Clarke a ?crit :
> Setting aside the fact that this guy is clearly an asshole, does
> anyone understand what problem he is running into here?
>
> Ian.
I'd say that he installed sun's JVM but didn't choose to use it with
java-update-alternatives.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Clarke a écrit :
Setting aside the fact that this guy is clearly an asshole, does
anyone understand what problem he is running into here?
Ian.
I'd say that he installed sun's JVM but didn't choose to use it with
java-update-alternatives. He
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robert fallis a ?crit :
>>> Julien.
>>> have changed permission, but still no joy I have what seams to be a
>>> partly installed system, I have tried to run the uninstaller but that
>>> will not work, is there any way to uninstall. the stuff thats
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robert fallis a ?crit :
> Julien.
> have changed permission, but still no joy I have what seams to be a
> partly installed system, I have tried to run the uninstaller but that
> will not work, is there any way to uninstall. the stuff thats on the
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robert fallis a écrit :
Julien.
have changed permission, but still no joy I have what seams to be a
partly installed system, I have tried to run the uninstaller but that
will not work, is there any way to uninstall. the stuff thats on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robert fallis a ?crit :
| Java.IO. IO. exception cannot run program " home/robert/freenet/bin/
| install_updater.sh Io exception error13, permission denied
It looks like a permission problem. Where are you trying to install the
program ? You should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robert fallis a écrit :
| Java.IO. IO. exception cannot run program home/robert/freenet/bin/
| install_updater.sh Io exception error13, permission denied
It looks like a permission problem. Where are you trying to install the
program ? You should
the Sun packages.
| However, I needed to delete the packages
|
| gij
| gij-4.2
|
| After that I was able to install Freenet.
|
| Avi
|
|
| On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 08:59 +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
| Avi Kak a ?crit :
|
| | gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu6)
|
| You have
the Sun packages.
| However, I needed to delete the packages
|
| gij
| gij-4.2
|
| After that I was able to install Freenet.
|
| Avi
|
|
| On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 08:59 +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
| Avi Kak a écrit :
|
| | gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu6)
|
| You have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
abdussalam Mansoor a ?crit :
| Hello:
|
| I successfully installed Freenet 0.7 , but after opning the browser
| alwys receved "
| Status alerts summary
This is the list of all you node's problems. You can solve them,
one-by-one :
| Click on an item
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Avi Kak a ?crit :
| gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu6)
You have to use Sun's JVM :
$ sudo aptitude install sun-java6-jre
$ sudo update-java-alternatives -s java-6-sun
Regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Avi Kak a écrit :
| gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu6)
You have to use Sun's JVM :
$ sudo aptitude install sun-java6-jre
$ sudo update-java-alternatives -s java-6-sun
Regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
abdussalam Mansoor a écrit :
| Hello:
|
| I successfully installed Freenet 0.7 , but after opning the browser
| alwys receved
| Status alerts summary
This is the list of all you node's problems. You can solve them,
one-by-one :
| Click on an item
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Salvatore Del Popolo a ?crit :
> Hello,
> I installed Freenet 0.7 on a Linux machine, Ubuntu distribution 7.10. I
> downloaded and unpacked the .tar.gz file and I ran the command:
> ./run.sh start
>
> It seems all ok, but when pointed my browser,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Salvatore Del Popolo a écrit :
Hello,
I installed Freenet 0.7 on a Linux machine, Ubuntu distribution 7.10. I
downloaded and unpacked the .tar.gz file and I ran the command:
./run.sh start
It seems all ok, but when pointed my browser, lynx, to
Level 13 a ?crit :
> Would it be possible/feasible to run both 0.5 and 0.7 versions on the
> same computer (for a while)? Or could there be some conflicts between
> the two (and probably significant strain on system resources)?
It's perfectly feasible, if you have sufficient ressources...
Hi,
Just had the occasion to follow a beginner through the installation
process via Java Webstart, on Windows XP. Here is what I noticed :
- The installer is now signed with a Thawte certificate, which is
accepted by default. That's good !
- The two phase install confused the user. He thought
Hi,
Just had the occasion to follow a beginner through the installation
process via Java Webstart, on Windows XP. Here is what I noticed :
- The installer is now signed with a Thawte certificate, which is
accepted by default. That's good !
- The two phase install confused the user. He thought
Level 13 a écrit :
Would it be possible/feasible to run both 0.5 and 0.7 versions on the
same computer (for a while)? Or could there be some conflicts between
the two (and probably significant strain on system resources)?
It's perfectly feasible, if you have sufficient ressources...
Level 13 a ?crit :
> My node (version 0.5) is supposed to allow 90 concurrent open
> connections. However, in the last week or so I've only seen 40 listed
> connections in the Open Connections segment of node's control panel,
> e.g.
>
> Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 40 (0/40/90)
Level 13 a écrit :
My node (version 0.5) is supposed to allow 90 concurrent open
connections. However, in the last week or so I've only seen 40 listed
connections in the Open Connections segment of node's control panel,
e.g.
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 40 (0/40/90)
I read
Hi,
Just upgraded to the latest Ubuntu, which uses Firefix 3. I've got the
usual warnings about the certificate being self-signed, blah blah blah...
But, after I created a "Security exception" to accept this certificate,
I've got another error (sec_error_bad_signature) and the browser stops
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
>>> 1 megabit upload?
>> Yep. 14 down, 1 up.
>
> What's the fastest download speed you've seen? That's a seriously asymmetric
> connection...
It's quite common in France. At least in big cities.
On Freenet, I never saw more than 65-70 KB/s.
On the web, the best I
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
> On Tuesday 29 April 2008 11:56, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm sure a lot of users are interested about that. I've got 128KB/s
>> upload and Freenet limited to 40. Freenet runs on a dedicated computer
>> so resources consum
Hi,
I'm sure a lot of users are interested about that. I've got 128KB/s
upload and Freenet limited to 40. Freenet runs on a dedicated computer
so resources consumption is not an issue. For normal operations, I've
got no problems. But when it comes to online gaming, weird things happen :
Other
Simply Paranoid a ?crit :
> Hello fellow paranoids!
Hi,
> I've spent ~a good hour on the site trying to find answers for 2 simple
> yet important questions regarding insecure mode:
> 1. Can my ISP know what am I downloading/uploading to FreeNet?
No, he can't. This is clearly mentionned in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
My node auto-updated to 1073 yesterday evening and it is not yet up :
Your freenet node is starting up, please hold on.
Current status
INFO | jvm 4 | 2007/11/20 11:08:53 | Moving blocks: 0% ( 12287/1573376)
...
I think it is because I decided
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
My node auto-updated to 1073 yesterday evening and it is not yet up :
Your freenet node is starting up, please hold on.
Current status
INFO | jvm 4 | 2007/11/20 11:08:53 | Moving blocks: 0% ( 12287/1573376)
...
I think it is because I decided
Michael R. Hines a ?crit :
> Oh great.
>
> (I didn't change any default options. I just used the new_installer.jar)
>
> Can I get it from the website, or do I need check checkout a subversion copy?
>
You can download the latest trunk version here :
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/
an ominous cow herd a ?crit :
>I can empathize. Freenet is is one of the first projects that I've seen take
>a working application and push it aside, while directing new users to an
>alpha version. The way it would normally be done is listing Freenet 0.5 as
>the stable version instead of the
an ominous cow herd a écrit :
I can empathize. Freenet is is one of the first projects that I've seen take
a working application and push it aside, while directing new users to an
alpha version. The way it would normally be done is listing Freenet 0.5 as
the stable version instead of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
.7 has very few users, very little content, and no opennet.
It's useless for new users.
I'm not sure stopping linking it on the website would help it have more
users. About content, I see new freesites apearing quite the same rythm
as on 0.5 so it's just a
Hi,
I don't know if it's a known bug but this morning, when I tried to
update my 0.7 node, I found that both update.sh and update2.sh were empty !
Could someone put them on downloads.freenetproject.org so I can retreive
them safely ?
Regards
Hi,
I don't know if it's a known bug but this morning, when I tried to
update my 0.7 node, I found that both update.sh and update2.sh were empty !
Could someone put them on downloads.freenetproject.org so I can retreive
them safely ?
Regards
___
Bob a ?crit :
>Julien Cornuwel writes:
>
>
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>Someone asked me to help him but I don't know what causes that problem.
>>Is logfile is filled with that message (several per second). Do you know
>>
Bob a écrit :
Julien Cornuwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
Someone asked me to help him but I don't know what causes that problem.
Is logfile is filled with that message (several per second). Do you know
what it means and how to solve the problem
Hi all,
Someone asked me to help him but I don't know what causes that problem.
Is logfile is filled with that message (several per second). Do you know
what it means and how to solve the problem ?
QUOTE**
25 nov.
Hi all,
Someone asked me to help him but I don't know what causes that problem.
Is logfile is filled with that message (several per second). Do you know
what it means and how to solve the problem ?
QUOTE**
25
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
>My understanding is that the french crypto regulations were abandoned
>some time ago.
>
>
That law is just a project (no decree yet). For the moment, we're still
limited to 128b.
>Make your own darknet. :)
>Then come to Bristol, take me out for a pizza, and I'll
Matthew Toseland a écrit :
My understanding is that the french crypto regulations were abandoned
some time ago.
That law is just a project (no decree yet). For the moment, we're still
limited to 128b.
Make your own darknet. :)
Then come to Bristol, take me out for a pizza, and I'll connect
Following the post named "Hypothetical question", I'd like to expose you
a practical case : the French community. Stop me when I'm wrong.
We all know each others only by Freenet and it is said that it isn't
enough to form a darknet together, correct ? So we'll have to stay on
the opennet which is
Following the post named Hypothetical question, I'd like to expose you
a practical case : the French community. Stop me when I'm wrong.
We all know each others only by Freenet and it is said that it isn't
enough to form a darknet together, correct ? So we'll have to stay on
the opennet which is
Matthew Toseland a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 06:36:53PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
Following the post named Hypothetical question, I'd like to expose you
a practical case : the French community. Stop me when I'm wrong.
We all know each others only by Freenet and it is said
Hi,
The devs could consider adding the DBR site called "L'annuaire" to the
default bookmarks. It's a french-CPfree-index that seems to be reliable.
I think it could help french newbies to discover Freenet and make some
of them stay with us.
SSK at 5EeRgwKAe9mqZFwqYKNu6uE4l2APAgM/annuaire//
--
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
>Does this happen after you start Freenet up, or had the node already
>been running for a while? It's quite possible we have a slow FD leak
>somewhere...
>
>On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:35:43PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
>
>>
>>I'm cu
Hi,
The devs could consider adding the DBR site called L'annuaire to the
default bookmarks. It's a french-CPfree-index that seems to be reliable.
I think it could help french newbies to discover Freenet and make some
of them stay with us.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/annuaire//
--
Hi all,
After a few month of perfect working, my Freenet box (Sun Java 1.4.2 and
then 1.5 on Debian) began to be very slow.
To the point that it took up to 5 minutes just to show the "Web
Interface"...
The complete error message is :
Caught a java.io.IOException: Too many open files,
Hi all,
After a few month of perfect working, my Freenet box (Sun Java 1.4.2 and
then 1.5 on Debian) began to be very slow.
To the point that it took up to 5 minutes just to show the Web
Interface...
The complete error message is :
Caught a java.io.IOException: Too many open files,
Matthew Toseland a écrit :
Does this happen after you start Freenet up, or had the node already
been running for a while? It's quite possible we have a slow FD leak
somewhere...
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:35:43PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
I'm currently clearing the datastore :-/ Maybe
62 matches
Mail list logo
