because it _requires_ the internet.
Simple as that. :)
Greetings,
David
--
David ‘Bombe’ Roden bo...@pterodactylus.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http
On WOCHENTAG, tT. MONAT 23:21:53 Dennis Nezic wrote:
And, I still don't quite understand why you can't check the status of a
socket, or be notified of wget's FIN signal (It did send one, didn't
it, or am I missing something?) -- isn't that fundamental to any tcp
connection??
As Matthew
On Friday 08 April 2011 17:40:34 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Get a stack trace. Either attach a debugger or press ctrl+c (or was it
ctrl+break? not sure on windows) while it is stalled.
Ctrl+Break in the console window on Windows, kill -QUIT on Linux/BSD/OS X.
David
signature.asc
On Saturday 26 March 2011 20:52:41 CyberLeo wrote:
Since the fetching and decoding are now handled by the node instead of
the client, and the most detailed information offered by the
SimpleProgress stanza is a blind block count, is there an easy way via
the FCP to obtain a bitmap of
On Thursday 10 March 2011 09:04:38 Jean-Francois Romang wrote:
I'm discovering freenet and trying to control a node using FCP in Java. I
downloaded jFCPlib, but the highlevel interface
(net.pterodactylus.fcp.highlevel.*) seems unfinished (ie no way to put or
get some data) : do I miss
On Saturday 26 February 2011 01:01:34 Dennis Nezic wrote:
USK@1WZPo6qZmlCpi6rZWjtz~kig1gcpcnzh5drmqpW9L8Q,ksaFFDkSJfnOXB3ppYhQ2R14z
3WQCYxGqXNERCYcHD0,AQACAAE/wordsoftoad/-1/
I can't access this freesite. Despite hours of trying. (Other freesites
seem to work fine.)
That’s because an
On Saturday 26 February 2011 16:04:41 Dennis Nezic wrote:
The community-censorship idea proposed was retarded, yes.
On the contrary, some form of community-based censorship can be required for
smaller communities to run Freenet in order to keep a “clean” network (by
whatever standards).
On Friday 25 February 2011 21:45:26 folkert wrote:
I wonder why is msdnsdiscovery announcing itself on 192.168.64.1/24:
My guess is that the plugin does not know too much about Freenet’s
configuration and simply announces on the first interface it can find. For
more details, read the source.
On Sunday 12 December 2010 21:44:28 Robert Foss wrote:
Where can I find a compiled version of the jFCPlib jar?
Nowhere, I’m afraid. At least I don’t offer any precompiled versions. You have
to build it yourself.
thanks :)
No problem. :)
David
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Sunday 13 February 2011 02:03:20 Roland Haeder wrote:
I would bet he is not a user. Please take a look at the date he sent it.
I am well aware that the mail is two months old.
Please also remember that Frost has similar legit-looking messages but
they are spam.
I could be wrong, but
On Thursday 20 January 2011 18:24:15 Dennis Nezic wrote:
Fix!
Please refrain from bossing us around. You are not in a position to do that.
David
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
On Thursday 20 January 2011 20:32:30 Dennis Nezic wrote:
Fix!
Please refrain from bossing us around. You are not in a position to
do that.
Please refrain from mis-interpreting my words. (There is such a thing
as 'c-o-n-t-e-x-t', eh?) (Perhaps acquire a sense of humor while you're
at
On Monday 10 January 2011 17:13:17 Dennis Nezic wrote:
Fix!
With /that/ tone you should be prepared to offer money for fixing it;
otherwise shut up.
David
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 04:14:18 Dennis Nezic wrote:
What's going on with the networking code?
Very normal behaviour. Most threads are waiting in ServerSocket.accept() which
is expected as those threads are waiting for somebody to connect. You have a
NetworkInterface (for fproxy), a
On Saturday 16 October 2010 10:58:30 Dennis Nezic wrote:
Oh, right, it is also very insecure. I'm not sure what incognito mode
is, and believe it or not, not everyone uses Firefox or Chrome, but
won't JavaScript still leak information like a drunk widow? (Ie. your
browser, display resolution,
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 13:26:51 Marco A. Calamari wrote:
I'm using jSite to insert an already inserted freesite;
I was unable to find how define and change what files
are included in a container (from the interface).
That’s because it is disabled. (I feel like I have written this before.)
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 20:43 -0400, Michael R. Hines wrote:
> I fixed it my self by removing internationalization call from the faulting
> line.
The l10n call never was the problem, that call was missing the name of
the HTML node (which should have been "#"). Fixed in more recent
versions, sorry
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 13:19 -0400, Michael R. Hines wrote:
> java.lang.AssertionError
> at freenet.support.HTMLNode.(HTMLNode.java:46)
> at freenet.support.HTMLNode.(HTMLNode.java:31)
> at freenet.support.HTMLNode.(HTMLNode.java:58)
Fixed in r15442.
I really wonder why
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 23:47, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote:
> Have you thought about that ignoring reset packets thing that was
> shown to make it possible to bypass The Great Firewall? I mean, I
> don't know too much about it, or if it'd be possible for
> freenetbut it might be worth
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 22:35, inverse wrote:
> beyond harvesting the connected IP addresses to raid their owner's
> homes, one big concern with encrypted protocols is that they can be
> filtered out by application-level scanning firewalls. I think this is
> exactly what's happening in China.
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 22:35, inverse wrote:
beyond harvesting the connected IP addresses to raid their owner's
homes, one big concern with encrypted protocols is that they can be
filtered out by application-level scanning firewalls. I think this is
exactly what's happening in China.
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 23:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you thought about that ignoring reset packets thing that was
shown to make it possible to bypass The Great Firewall? I mean, I
don't know too much about it, or if it'd be possible for
freenetbut it might be worth looking in
On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:06, an ominous cow herd wrote:
> My question, which has yet to be answered, is why did the Freenet
> project break with the previous release model and start directing new
> users to the unstable alpha 0.7 release?
Because Freenet 0.5 and Freenet 0.7 are two separate
23 matches
Mail list logo
