Re: [freenet-support] [Bug report?] NullPointerException in PacketSender

On Monday 27 October 2008 23.49.18 Dan Stevens wrote: > Freenet 0.7 Build #1165 r22843M > Freenet-ext Build #22 r22506 > > After running seemingly just fine for several weeks, I suddenly ran > out of disk space. The problem turned out to be my freenet log, which > was expanding at about a megabyte

[freenet-support] [Bug report?] NullPointerException in PacketSender

Freenet 0.7 Build #1165 r22843M Freenet-ext Build #22 r22506 After running seemingly just fine for several weeks, I suddenly ran out of disk space. The problem turned out to be my freenet log, which was expanding at about a megabyte per second, full of message like this: Oct 27, 2008 22:00:01:27

[freenet-support] bug in r9081 (.7)

Try creating a file called "recreate_secondary_db" in the store directory. On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 05:18:00PM -0500, geckox wrote: > I just upgraded and started it again and got the same problem. Did my > datastore get corrupted? > > Here's the output from the latest. > > Created log files > I

Re: [freenet-support] bug in r9081 (.7)

Try creating a file called "recreate_secondary_db" in the store directory. On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 05:18:00PM -0500, geckox wrote: > I just upgraded and started it again and got the same problem. Did my > datastore get corrupted? > > Here's the output from the latest. > > Created log files > I

[freenet-support] bug in r9081 (.7)

I just upgraded and started it again and got the same problem. Did my datastore get corrupted? Here's the output from the latest. Created log files INFO: Native CPUID library 'freenet/support/CPUInformation/libjcpuid-x86-linux.so' loaded from resource INFO: Optimized native BigInteger library

Re: [freenet-support] bug in r9081 (.7)

I just upgraded and started it again and got the same problem. Did my datastore get corrupted? Here's the output from the latest. Created log files INFO: Native CPUID library 'freenet/support/CPUInformation/libjcpuid-x86-linux.so' loaded from resource INFO: Optimized native BigInteger library

[freenet-support] bug in r9081 (.7)

I seem to have found a problem when I upgraded to r9081. I cannot start Freenet 0.7 now. Maybe this is related to the fact that I do not have X on this Linux machine (since it's headless), so I had to do a manual install around build 643 or so. Here is what I get when I start freenet: Crea

[freenet-support] bug in r9081 (.7)

I seem to have found a problem when I upgraded to r9081. I cannot start Freenet 0.7 now. Maybe this is related to the fact that I do not have X on this Linux machine (since it's headless), so I had to do a manual install around build 643 or so. Here is what I get when I start freenet: Crea

[freenet-support] Bug report : update scripts are empty

On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:33:57AM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know if it's a known bug but this morning, when I tried to > update my 0.7 node, I found that both update.sh and update2.sh were empty ! > > Could someone put them on downloads.freenetproject.org so I can retreive

[freenet-support] Bug report : update scripts are empty

Hi, I don't know if it's a known bug but this morning, when I tried to update my 0.7 node, I found that both update.sh and update2.sh were empty ! Could someone put them on downloads.freenetproject.org so I can retreive them safely ? Regards

Re: [freenet-support] Bug report : update scripts are empty

On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:33:57AM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know if it's a known bug but this morning, when I tried to > update my 0.7 node, I found that both update.sh and update2.sh were empty ! > > Could someone put them on downloads.freenetproject.org so I can retreive

[freenet-support] Bug report : update scripts are empty

Hi, I don't know if it's a known bug but this morning, when I tried to update my 0.7 node, I found that both update.sh and update2.sh were empty ! Could someone put them on downloads.freenetproject.org so I can retreive them safely ? Regards ___ S

[freenet-support] Bug

 Hello!   I believe there may be a problem. I keep getting the following error message:java.io.FileNotFoundException: C:\DOCUME~1\Donald\LOCALS~1\Temp\freenet\tbf_7b3a67 (The system cannot find the path specified) java.io.FileNotFoundException: C:\DOCUME~1\Donald\LOCALS~1\Temp\freenet\tbf_7b3a

[freenet-support] Bug: Missing DNS gives no error

I just restarted my node which had run perfectly for more than a week. But for some reason it would not start. The log ended with: May 21, 2004 2:00:35 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Starting Freenet (Fred) 0.5 node, build #5082 on JVM Blackdown Java-Linux Team:Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM:

Re: [freenet-support] Bug found in 5077

In einer eMail vom Di, 27. Apr. 2004 15:44 MEZ schreibt Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 01:57:41PM +0200, Rama Jagerman wrote: >> Current upstream bandwidth usage  164677 bytes/second (164.7%) [...] >average out to no more than the target. HOWEVER, there is a hard limit >of 140

Re: [freenet-support] Bug found in 5077

On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 01:57:41PM +0200, Rama Jagerman wrote: > Hi, > > First of all, congratulations with the new stable version of Freenet. > > At this moment I am almost sure that there is a bug in Freenet, please > see the next line, that I copied from Performance --> General > Information:

[freenet-support] Bug found in 5077

Hi, First of all, congratulations with the new stable version of Freenet. At this moment I am almost sure that there is a bug in Freenet, please see the next line, that I copied from Performance --> General Information: Current upstream bandwidth usage164677 bytes/second (164.7%) Note

Re: [freenet-support] Bug Report - win32 - freenet.exe - logFile=*path*not handled

Ur, or maybe I hardcoded "freenet.log" in the viewer and never fixed it... my bad. > (fwiw it sounds like it isn't querying the ini file each time you click > View Logfile - I think it's probably just querying once at startup) > > >> Oops, that may well be a very old bug. That shouldn't be too ha

Re: [freenet-support] Bug Report - win32 - freenet.exe - logFile=*path*not handled

(fwiw it sounds like it isn't querying the ini file each time you click View Logfile - I think it's probably just querying once at startup) > Oops, that may well be a very old bug. That shouldn't be too hard to fix, > I'll crack one out tonight. > >> I have changed the "logFile" option in the fr

Re: [freenet-support] Bug Report - win32 - freenet.exe - logFile=*path*not handled

Oops, that may well be a very old bug. That shouldn't be too hard to fix, I'll crack one out tonight. > I have changed the "logFile" option in the freenet.ini file to an other > path. But when I click on "View Logfile ..." in the context menu of the > blue freenet symbol, freenet.exe still shows

[freenet-support] Bug Report - win32 - freenet.exe - logFile=*path* not handled

I have changed the "logFile" option in the freenet.ini file to an other path. But when I click on "View Logfile ..." in the context menu of the blue freenet symbol, freenet.exe still shows me the old unused freenet.log in the freenet directory. Rudi __

[freenet-support] bug report (?)

Sometimes I get this error message on stable build 5068 (and the builds before). I think client programs fetching keys via fcp stall , untill the socket timeouts (If set). I use linux and sun jvm 1.4.1_03-b02. Caught java.lang.IllegalStateException: Not sending a trailer running maintenance que

[freenet-support] Bug report

Hello, I'm using build 5065 on GNU/Linux on i386, with j2sdk1.4.0_02. I got the following messages. Generally, whenever I leave my freenet node running a few hours, it ends up running out of memory (I have 256Mo And 500Mo swap), using a lot of CPU (I have a P3 700 and a 512/128kbps DSL connexi

[freenet-support] Bug?

Hi, i received this message from Fred 5 build 5061: Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 14 in queue, 3108 millis since enqueued last item, 791012 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. kernel: 2.4.20 jvm: 1.4.2_03 bye ___ Support mailing

[freenet-support] Bug report

Hi: Using build 6441, and fred said: Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 15 in queue, 6701 millis since enqueued last item, 291589 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel. Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 6 in queu

[freenet-support] Bug report

Hi: Using build 6440, just downloaded n' fred said: Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 6 in queue, 4401 millis since enqueued last item, 2057 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel. java version "1.4.2" Java(TM) 2

Re: Fwd: [freenet-support] bug in 6430

>> I just do not know, where to report this, (probably it was noticed already >> anyway...), but the bandwith limiting in unstable version 6430 seems to be broken: >> >> Current upstream bandwidth usage 14576 bytes/second (145,8%) >> >> And the node is not QueryRejecting or something like that and

Re: [freenet-support] bug in 6430

On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:10:36PM -0500, Edward J. Huff wrote: > On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 11:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I just do not know, where to report this, (probably it was noticed already > > anyway...), but the bandwith limiting in unstable version 6430 seems to be broken: > > > > Cur

Re: Fwd: [freenet-support] bug in 6430

EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 > >X-AOL-IP: 172.180.239.238 > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > >Subject: [freenet-support] bug in 6430 > >X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >X-Mailman-Versi

Re: [freenet-support] Bug or Feature?

On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 12:14, Rudolf Krist wrote: > Hello, > after I have upgraded my node to the Build 6415, the routing table only > contained nodes with the Build Nr. >= 6415. Is that a new feature? Or > was it not intended? Yes, users of the unstable build are expected to upgrade daily. -- E

[freenet-support] Bug or Feature?

Hello, after I have upgraded my node to the Build 6415, the routing table only contained nodes with the Build Nr. >= 6415. Is that a new feature? Or was it not intended? Regards Rudi ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gman

[freenet-support] bug report

hi, i got this message while trying to request the YoYo frontpage ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/YoYo//) with fcpget from FCPtools v0.4.7: Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 9 in queue, 2599 millis since enqueued last item, 19876 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please report to [EMAIL

[freenet-support] Bug ? report

Hi, freenet sw asked me to report this, I hope I do the right thing... [EMAIL PROTECTED] freenet]$ sh start-freenet.sh Starting Freenet now: Done [EMAIL PROTECTED] freenet]$ requestIntervalDefault: 1000 requestIntervalQRFactor: 1.05 requestIntervalAcceptedFactor: 0.9523809523809523 ---Unexpected E

Re: [freenet-support] bug? Can't set storeSize in human-readable format

On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 07:16:02AM -0600, GeckoX wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I tried setting my storeSize in 0.5.0.3 to 2G and fred wouldn't start. > > Here's what I tried to do in freenet.conf: > storeSize=2G This is only supported in the development/unstable br

[freenet-support] bug? Can't set storeSize in human-readable format

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I tried setting my storeSize in 0.5.0.3 to 2G and fred wouldn't start. Here's what I tried to do in freenet.conf: storeSize=2G Here's the log: Oct 31, 2002 7:10:43 AM (freenet.support.io.Bandwidth, main): new Bandwidth(10,0,BOTH) Oct 31, 2002

[freenet-support] Bug(?) in SplitFileDownloader?

When attempting to download a file via the web interface (eg using 127.0.0.1:), i get this message: Error sending data to browser: java.lang.IllegalStateException: The SplitFileDownloader is already running. the console dumps this: java.lang.IllegalStateException: The SplitFileDownloader is

Re: [freenet-support] Bug?

Mishari Muqbil wrote: > Sebastien: You might want to grab a copy of the SeedNode from CoFE (if > you haven't done so already) he seems to have more entries in it, at the > moment. I haven't. *I* don't want to make any seeds public where the owners haven't explicitely stated their willingness

[freenet-support] Bug?

Hello I may have come across a bug in the 18/10 snapshot of FreeNet. Basically, if I insert the node into it's own seedfile, it connects to itself. Don't know what the implications are, but a situation like this is usually not a good thing(tm) btw, you guys kick ass. keep it up. Sebastien: Y

Re: [freenet-support] Bug...

: Thursday, June 07, 2001 1:15 PM Subject: [freenet-support] Bug... Hi, there, I tried to install Freenet on an Win 2000 Notebook. I get the error, that there is no java environment on the computer and the address of Sun. I visited the Sun-Site, but there is nothing for download. What can I do

[freenet-support] Bug...

Hi, there,   I tried to install Freenet on an Win 2000 Notebook. I get the error, that there is no java environment on the computer and the address of Sun. I visited the Sun-Site, but there is nothing for download.   What can I do?   Regards,   Marcus

[freenet-support] bug repport :(

hi, freenet lauches and appears in the task bar but won't open neither the config window nore http://localhost:8081/ i run freenet 0.3.9.1 win Me JRE v 1.3.0_02

[freenet-support] bug report

hi, freenet lauches but won't open any window, neither the config nore the http://localhost:8081/ one. i run Freenet 0.3.9.1 on Win Me with JRE v 1.3.0_02

[freenet-support] bug

Comme vous l'avez gentillement indiqué, il arrive que freenet après installation ne fonctionne pas. Je fais sans doute parti des nombreux inernautes qui ne connaissent pas la version qui marche... Après avoir téléchargez la version 0.3.9.1, tout s'est passé correctement. L'installateur Window

[freenet-support] Bug in Installer for 0.3.9.1

Hi, I have had problems using Freenet-nojava-setup0.3.9.1.exe. Here are the details. What went wrong: Couldn't start freenet after the installation. Got Error Message: Could not find the main class program will exit. Also: White rabbit appeared on task bar. Selecting Open Gateway or St

[freenet-support] bug in v.0.3.9.1

My setup :  PIII450/128mb/win98se/cablemodem When i updated from v.0.3.8.1 i lost the configuration window. The ini-file is there so i can do it manually though. Besides from that it seems to work fine. Nice work.  It's getting better all the time.

[freenet-support] Bug Report

Freenet Version: 0.3.9.1 OS: Windows 98 Java Runtime Environment: JRE 1.3 Using latest version of Internet Explorer (with Fproxy)   I received the "Warning: Executable code or embedded external links in document" message when attempting to retrieve an html page with a "http-equiv=" tag.  The

RE: [freenet-support] bug report

> I am about to try freenet. I am installing it on Win2000P. The install > process has come to a point where I have to chose a "Java > interpreter". > There are 5 lines displayed, but some directory names are you should be happy to learn, then, that the new (.3.9) installer doesn't behave that

[freenet-support] bug report

Hi! I am about to try freenet. I am installing it on Win2000P. The install process has come to a point where I have to chose a "Java interpreter". There are 5 lines displayed, but some directory names are long, so I can not see the file name, only the first 3 directories near the root directory,

[freenet-support] Bug? Bandwidth limiting not working

All, I'm running 3.8.1, and in my ".freenetrc" I have "bandwidthLimit=10". According to the comment listed above it, this should limit bandwidth usage ( I assume bi-directionally? ) to about 0.8Mbps ( maybe 1Mbps with overhead, etc..). This doesn't seem to work. My node was eating up approx.

<    1   2