[freenet-support] Re: start-problems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Quoting Steffen Schwientek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I can?t connect to my freenet-core. If I point my browser to localhost:, i just get not found. Once you run the startup script, it will take a couple minutes (sic) for the node to start. Believe it or not, this longer startup means faster operation once it does get started. Perhaps minutes, but not hours. I started the freenet-daemon using the gentoo freenet startup script What command did you actually issue? /etc/init.d/freenet start. But that?s worse, because it hides the errors. I now trie the normal ./start-freenet.sh script, provided by the freenet-project. This fails with the following error: ed: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory head: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory grep: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory grep: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory grep: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Starting Freenet now: Command line: java -Xmx128m -XX:MaxDirectMemorySize=128m freenet.node.Main Done The requested libc.so.6 library sits in /lib directory. Perhaps I need to recompile the libc directory. Steffen ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:50:55AM +0200, Garb wrote: Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:55:53 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I installed from Portage, and I was amazed at how well it handled the install. I especially liked the pre-made init script... Yes, it works really well. And the default Blackdown JAVA-install works right out of the box too, eliminating the need for messing aroud with SUN JRE. I've had Freenet running on several distros, but Gentoo is definitely the easiest one to work with. Blackdown works well with Freenet? I heard one bad report... Kudos to the people who integrated Freenet into the Portage tree. Those guys did a very fine job. How did you know to change the paths to /var/freenet and so on? In the ebuild you can see where it wants everything to go Cat /usr/portage/net-p2p/freenet/freenet-0.5.2.1-r8.ebuild -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems
Toad wrote: On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:50:55AM +0200, Garb wrote: Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:55:53 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I installed from Portage, and I was amazed at how well it handled the install. I especially liked the pre-made init script... Yes, it works really well. And the default Blackdown JAVA-install works right out of the box too, eliminating the need for messing aroud with SUN JRE. I've had Freenet running on several distros, but Gentoo is definitely the easiest one to work with. Blackdown works well with Freenet? I heard one bad report... I had a few crashes and then switched to Sun's JDK. Other than that, Blackdown was fine :P Kudos to the people who integrated Freenet into the Portage tree. Those guys did a very fine job. How did you know to change the paths to /var/freenet and so on? In the ebuild you can see where it wants everything to go Cat /usr/portage/net-p2p/freenet/freenet-0.5.2.1-r8.ebuild ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:07:00PM +0100, Toad wrote: On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:50:55AM +0200, Garb wrote: Yes, it works really well. And the default Blackdown JAVA-install works right out of the box too, eliminating the need for messing aroud with SUN JRE. I've had Freenet running on several distros, but Gentoo is definitely the easiest one to work with. Blackdown works well with Freenet? I heard one bad report... This was not perhaps my report? I had serious trouble some time ago (using blackdown on linux ...). But it turned out that there was a change in the way the freenet.conf file was interpreted. Took me some time to realize that the old OutputBandwidthLimit was in kByte and the new one in Bytes. And an OutputBandwidthLimit of 4 Bates is just to slow for every node ;-) Florian -- Serfs up! -- Spartacus pgpjvIa2rgrZv.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems
When was outputBandwidthLimit EVER in kilobytes/sec? Maybe the Windows configurator used kB/sec... On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:46:29AM +0200, Florian Streck wrote: On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:07:00PM +0100, Toad wrote: On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:50:55AM +0200, Garb wrote: Yes, it works really well. And the default Blackdown JAVA-install works right out of the box too, eliminating the need for messing aroud with SUN JRE. I've had Freenet running on several distros, but Gentoo is definitely the easiest one to work with. Blackdown works well with Freenet? I heard one bad report... This was not perhaps my report? I had serious trouble some time ago (using blackdown on linux ...). But it turned out that there was a change in the way the freenet.conf file was interpreted. Took me some time to realize that the old OutputBandwidthLimit was in kByte and the new one in Bytes. And an OutputBandwidthLimit of 4 Bates is just to slow for every node ;-) Florian -- Serfs up! -- Spartacus ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | Blackdown works well with Freenet? I heard one bad report... Unless it's causing my slowness, blackdown works fine for me. I'd rather be using Kaffe, but I've had issues making that work on Gentoo. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBQPNK9HgHNmZLgCUhAQIkdA//b7+KIj/NRy/Yxw+qfaXm5QPloml40RP3 hvcioB86g5cjShysbsXGDIJtA2wYVGiKUiw0CtCBOt3mOM/53vmxbfn6Ti4yktpu 9ChF3YEUoKPpkershJvbSDrdm3rC5GgBUSs7zuGzjbmCCJz25PYE7SadNL9k6klX CyNTkeJawI5RwcFWPeQH0iDevwVDwFl02NAzbf4pUkA8dXMXSmPRTW1lrPFcdjmL 0e6ZF+UJN/ooMjh+XjnaouKhsdmKXqzONf9tWDEU99hhdFMq+NfJdjvLus7pQ7N9 nmSWBs+QeM2UoW3zuL7yg3FyN/6K1ijyD5EeGQW8CoPAdPZntLjRW+rZwI87nZvy HqobquMKpCGnj8tP+vfRg+1pSjAC6xqs5uO0vHHiw+cX/lxK6c/Gjbyn+u6XcHiG CHqn/C0RKUPS2t14nKOu3MVGZv08gs9M5bp4pTGwaj3wSlgcj9BM0jyNf/OtvU9m S/8uDvXNlNJkzW4ClBVrWkSQ7xlbo64NsGb6CIbH6SWVOmdSr08/QiGuyLvIKMMT 3+7g275CZd3c0X55e+Uc0eMP1CWztP3I/CuCLCHUYHPx8pyVQIIzMrlHJ8QH5knL xmU0taGWUwSg2ob7YGSrJt84xEpzvznFOjrSVN/yeZs3bZszAJGj2pAKT/eCyTw/ +dprIWRzZeE= =AAvy -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] RE: start-problems
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:55:53 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I installed from Portage, and I was amazed at how well it handled the install. I especially liked the pre-made init script... Yes, it works really well. And the default Blackdown JAVA-install works right out of the box too, eliminating the need for messing aroud with SUN JRE. I've had Freenet running on several distros, but Gentoo is definitely the easiest one to work with. Kudos to the people who integrated Freenet into the Portage tree. Those guys did a very fine job. How did you know to change the paths to /var/freenet and so on? In the ebuild you can see where it wants everything to go Cat /usr/portage/net-p2p/freenet/freenet-0.5.2.1-r8.ebuild Regards, J ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems
Quoting Garb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I too am running Freenet from Gentoo (kernel 2.6.7), I too! my initial joy over finding it in the portage tree and thus being able to simply emerge it was quicly cooled by the fact, that the configuration E-build appears broken. Wow. I had the opposite experience. I've run from a manual install for the longest time. But here about two weeks ago I installed from Portage, and I was amazed at how well it handled the install. I especially liked the pre-made init script. I didn't have any problems with the configuration. Clever idea, transferring freenet.ini to freenet.conf. How did you know to change the paths to /var/freenet and so on? Rc-update add freenet default With a lower-case 'r', of course. Overall, I'm very happy with the Portage installation of Freenet. -todd ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] RE: start-problems
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:37:19 +0200 From: Steffen Schwientek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] start-problems To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I can´t connect to my freenet-core. If I point my browser to localhost:, i just get not found. I started the freenet-daemon using the gentoo freenet startup script, which certainly starts an java engine, but I don´t know if it also start freenet, since no log is written, and I can´t connect to the freenet port. Any suggestion? Hi Steffen I too am running Freenet from Gentoo (kernel 2.6.7), and my initial joy over finding it in the portage tree and thus being able to simply emerge it was quicly cooled by the fact, that the configuration E-build appears broken. It would simply freeze after asking for my port number, and never get further. This meant that the configuration file was never written. I solved that problem by installing Freenet on a Windows PC and simply copy the file freenet.ini to my Gentoo-box into /etc/freenet.conf. I shall post it at the end of this mail. As you see, it looks pretty normal apart from the file paths seedFile=/var/freenet/seednodes.ref diagnosticsPath=/var/freenet/stats logFile=/var/freenet/freenet.log nodeFile=/var/freenet/node routingDir=/var/freenet storeFile=/var/freenet/store Here you can also see, where the logfile ends up. Notice also that I have the line... mainport.allowedHosts=* ... which allows everybody on the internet to connect to Fred through my machine. This was only for testing purposes and should be changed to something less dangerously. Anyway - after you've gotten the freenet.conf taken care of (changed the paths, entered your own IP and made a port redirect in your router for whatever listenport you are using), it's simply a matter of starting the thing /etc/init.d/freenet start And if everything seems to run smoothly, let it be started automatically at boot... Rc-update add freenet default As far as checking whether it is running correctly, a ps -A should show you not one, but a lot of java processes. And of course you should also be able to connect to Fred in your browser. Freenet runs very well on the Blackdown-JAVA that Gentoo installs - and so does FIW. Good luck, J --- my freenet.conf [Freenet node] # Freenet configuration file # Note that all properties may be overridden from the command line, # so for example, java freenet.node.Main --listenPort 1 will cause # the setting in this file to be ignored # * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # * # * --=== READ THIS!!! READ THIS!!!READ THIS!!! =--- # * # * + VERY IMPORTANT!! + # * # * #something is a comment! # * %something is ALSO a comment! # * # * # * if you change any settings, REMOVE THE % IN THE BEGINNING OF THE LINE! # * # * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # Lines that start with % are settings that have been unchanged from # default, and that are thus ignored by the node (so they don't linger # when we want to change the default settings). If you change these # settings you should remove the %. # This file was automatically generated by Freenet.scripts.Setup (at 02-07-2004 02:07:06) # The IP address of this node as seen by the public Internet. You only need to override this if it cannot be autodetected, for example if you have a NAT (a.k.a. IP Masquerading) firewall/router, in which case you will need to set it to the IP address or DNS name of the internet-side interface of the router, which needs to be static (www.dyndns.org and similar services can help here if you have a dynamic IP). ipAddress=Steffen Schwienteks IP goes here # The port to listen for incoming FNP (Freenet Node Protocol) connections on. listenPort=37407 # The port to listen for local FCP (Freenet Client Protocol) connections on. clientPort=8481 # A comma-separated list of hosts that may connect to the FCP port # (clientPort). If left blank, only the localhost will be allowed. If you set this, make sure localhost is included in the list or access won't be allowed from the local machine. # May be given as IP addresses or host names. fcpHosts=localhost,127.0.0.1,10.0.0.3 # If this is set then users that can provide the password can # can have administrative access. It is recommended that # you do not use this without also using adminPeer below # in which case both are required. %adminPassword=null # If this is set, then users that are authenticated owners # of the given PK identity can have administrative access. # If adminPassword is also set both are required. %adminPeer=null # Transient nodes do not give out references to themselves, and should # therefore not receive any requests. Set this to yes if you cannot # receive incoming connections, or
