"[EMAIL PROTECTED],UUleYfXnBfLThNmkB8dACg" part might
be the bit with which they are having trouble. freenet:xxx URLs won't
change that, but they will introduce a world of pain.
Freenet URLs are much more likely to be given to people in hyperlink
form, in which case the actual form of the URL i
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:03:33 +, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just how are you trying to get people to visit such links? Verbally? If
Thanks for calling Freenet advocates "idiots" - but the reaction is more
pity from my side than anything else. "http://localhost:"; is what
peopl
Troed Sångberg wrote:
You asked what is needed for general acceptance of Freenet, I replied.
And I disagreed.
I've advocated Freenet for a long time along my peers (I'm a
professional Software Engineer, specialising in crypto/security issues)
- and trying to get people to visit links to http://l
