Re: [freenet-support] persistence question

2010-09-01 Thread Eric Chadbourne
>>> so, ahh, what does the persistence column exactly mean in freenet? >> >> Good question :b. found the answer. http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/FCPv2#Persistence_and_the_Global_Queue it has nothing to do with what i had assumed. damn. thanks for your help, eric c signature.asc Descripti

Re: [freenet-support] persistence question

2010-09-01 Thread Eric Chadbourne
On 08/31/2010 11:36 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote: ... > Yea, data persistence isn't that great at the moment. But you "hosting" > all the data just isn't how Freenet works. (Someone correct me if I'm > wrong.) Each node is intended to specialize around a tight keyspace -- > I believe this is intrinsic to

Re: [freenet-support] persistence question

2010-09-01 Thread Eric Chadbourne
On 08/31/2010 11:36 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote: > Yea, data persistence isn't that great at the moment. But you > "hosting" all the data just isn't how Freenet works. (Someone correct > me if I'm wrong.) Each node is intended to specialize around a tight > keyspace -- I believe this is intrinsic to the

Re: [freenet-support] persistence question

2010-08-31 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:41:16 -0400, Eric Chadbourne wrote: > > That would defeat the purpose of Freenet :b. Entirely. Imagine if > > many people started doing this -- the data wouldn't spread properly, > > and would fall off the network fast. We sacrificed latency for > > redundancy (and security)

Re: [freenet-support] persistence question

2010-08-31 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:41:16 -0400, Eric Chadbourne wrote: > > That would defeat the purpose of Freenet :b. Entirely. Imagine if > > many people started doing this -- the data wouldn't spread properly, > > and would fall off the network fast. We sacrificed latency for > > redundancy (and security)

Re: [freenet-support] persistence question

2010-08-31 Thread Eric Chadbourne
> That would defeat the purpose of Freenet :b. Entirely. Imagine if > many people started doing this -- the data wouldn't spread properly, > and would fall off the network fast. We sacrificed latency for > redundancy (and security) from the beginning. i hear what you're saying. and i don't disagr

Re: [freenet-support] persistence question

2010-08-31 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:01:56 -0400, Eric Chadbourne wrote: > hi all. > > when i upload a file, is that file on my local data store? > > what does the persistence column stand for in > http://127.0.0.1:/uploads/ ? > > i would like to upload a very large amount of files and i would like > to *