Sorry, local Americanism, I guess. If is a smile that has an artificial
appearance because the corner of the mouth don't seem to know where they
should be. Usually carries a derogatory implication to the observer,
perhaps "forced grim" would carry the idea. -- Sorry.
Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Has anyone figured out what he had for lunch. The schmerk is almost
missing in his "salute" picture in the USA Today shot by AFP.
Does that stand for Air Force Photograph. I didn't say gone, just
"almost" missing.
What's a schmerk?
Agence France Presse.
Z
--
Framtiden är
Anyway, long live king bush
Has anyone figured out what he had for lunch. The schmerk is almost
missing in his "salute" picture in the USA Today shot by AFP.
Does that stand for Air Force Photograph. I didn't say gone, just
"almost" missing.
___
OTOH woulden't the open proxy be an isp? The proxy is really just a
router between two networks. The networks don't need to have the same
lower level protocalls... The other differene would be that no one is
paying him for the service. But then comes in the free ISPs of the dot
com era. Given the p
Toad wrote:
They are not indexed by google because by default fproxy sends a
robots.txt indicating that it shouldn't be spidered.
Aaah, I see. That explains S' comment too. Well, current
legislation does not require me to learn java, but it
does not forbid me to either ;)
[prosecutor's block orders
Toad wrote:
They are not indexed by google because by default fproxy sends a
robots.txt indicating that it shouldn't be spidered.
Aaah, I see. That explains S' comment too. Well, current
legislation does not require me to learn java, but it
does not forbid me to either ;)
[prosecutor's block orders
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 03:35:40PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
>
> Toad wrote:
>
> >>Well, this contradics what you just wrote above. If you are right
> >>on this point, then your fears about thousands of users leeching
> >>and burdening freenet without giving anything back are unfounded
> >>al
Toad wrote:
Well, this contradics what you just wrote above. If you are right
on this point, then your fears about thousands of users leeching
and burdening freenet without giving anything back are unfounded
already because of this, even disregarding my arguments above. Or
vice versa. Of course, if
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 01:52:05PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
> >People have run public nodes before, but Google never indexed them
> >beyond the main Web Interface page, so their audience consisted of
> >people who a) were already Freenet users and b) knew exactly what to
> >search for in Googl
S wrote:
I don't really agree with the idea that such a pr0xy would bring
exposure or users to Freenet. Joe Surfer, upon finding your gatewayed
content in Google, is going to click through, access the content, and
move on, not realizing that he's ventured beyond the confines of the
normal web. Usef
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"S" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) makes some valid points. I didn't feel like
quoting the whole thing, but...
They are all moot if there's a big banner inserted onto every page which
points to an explanation of freenet (as well as a disclaimer somewhere),
and s
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 02:06:51 +0200
Zenon Panoussis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would really appreciate your thoughts on these issues, especially
> pointers to aspects I've missed.
I don't really agree with the idea that such a pr0xy would bring
exposure or users to Freenet. Joe Surfer, upon fi
The whole load/logging/key harvesting discussion I started here
a couple of days ago originated from my wish to make freenet
searchable, especially to the non-freenet world. So I installed
an open p r o x y in order to harvest keys, so that I could set
up a search engine.
What I only realised when
13 matches
Mail list logo
