Re: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a windows perspective.

2004-08-19 Thread Jay Oliveri
Transient isn't that relevant anymore; the current build in CVS has all 
traces of the Transient property removed.

So you won't notice much of a difference using this property on stable 
(build 5091).

On Thursday 19 August 2004 03:05 am, Don Gregory wrote:
> Well, I HAVE bumped into the half-open connection limit once or twice.
> Mostly it's an issue for people using P2P clients, edonkey, overnet,
> etc...  It's easy enough to fix anway.
>
> I did some reading on the subject, and the recommendation I got was to
> manually change the config file to have "TransientNode=False" in it.
> Apparently Freenet won't integrate into the network as well if you're
> set to transient.  In the process of testing it now.  I'll know better
> in a day or so.
>
> Don

-- 
Jay Oliveri
GnuPG ID: 0x5AA5DD54
FCPTools Maintainer
www.sf.net/users/joliveri
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a windows perspective.

2004-08-19 Thread Don Gregory
Well, I HAVE bumped into the half-open connection limit once or twice.
Mostly it's an issue for people using P2P clients, edonkey, overnet,
etc...  It's easy enough to fix anway.

I did some reading on the subject, and the recommendation I got was to
manually change the config file to have "TransientNode=False" in it.
Apparently Freenet won't integrate into the network as well if you're
set to transient.  In the process of testing it now.  I'll know better
in a day or so.

Don


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Michael DeLisle
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 1:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a 
> windows perspective.
> 
> 
>   I recently installed a new node from scratch on a 
> Windows XP SP2 box, 
> and here are my observations.
> 
>   While there's lots of talk about SP2 limiting TCP 
> connections, I 
> haven't see any real issues with it.
> 
>   On the negative side, freenet-java-webinstall.exe is 
> configured to 
> install Sun JRE 1.4.1, when I believe it should install 1.4.2.
> 
>   After 5 hours of uptime I only have 72 open 
> connections.  This was a 
> problem I experienced on my linux based node too; either the 
> seednodes.ref file is inadequate (weighing in at 26mB!) or 
> Freenet 5091 
> isn't aggressive enough about meeting maxNodeConnections.
> 
>   I would also like to point out that I'm currently only 
> using ~50% of 
> my upstream bandwidth, based on frequent observation of the "General 
> Information" page.  Perhaps Freenet should be more apt to take 
> advantage of newbie nodes?
> 
>   If there's any other information that would be of 
> assistance, please 
> let me know.
> 
> --mikeDOTd
> 
> ___
> Support mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.su> pport
> 
> Unsubscribe at 
> http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a windows perspective.

2004-08-18 Thread Michael DeLisle
	I recently installed a new node from scratch on a Windows XP SP2 box, 
and here are my observations.

	While there's lots of talk about SP2 limiting TCP connections, I 
haven't see any real issues with it.

	On the negative side, freenet-java-webinstall.exe is configured to 
install Sun JRE 1.4.1, when I believe it should install 1.4.2.

	After 5 hours of uptime I only have 72 open connections.  This was a 
problem I experienced on my linux based node too; either the 
seednodes.ref file is inadequate (weighing in at 26mB!) or Freenet 5091 
isn't aggressive enough about meeting maxNodeConnections.

	I would also like to point out that I'm currently only using ~50% of 
my upstream bandwidth, based on frequent observation of the "General 
Information" page.  Perhaps Freenet should be more apt to take 
advantage of newbie nodes?

	If there's any other information that would be of assistance, please 
let me know.

--mikeDOTd
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]