On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 12:49:29AM -0600, S wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 22:57:09 +
> Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So he should link to the project page, first and foremost. That's called
> > "doing your research".
>
> FYI, a Google search for Freenet returns freenet.sourceforge.net
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 22:57:09 +
Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So he should link to the project page, first and foremost. That's called
> "doing your research".
FYI, a Google search for Freenet returns freenet.sourceforge.net as the
3rd result. freenetproject.org is somewhere on the 8th pa
So he should link to the project page, first and foremost. That's called
"doing your research". We could release a 0.6.0-pre1, but it'd be
dubious...
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 04:23:45PM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
> As I said on IRC, a collegue of mine has made an article (well, actually
> more of a ref
As I said on IRC, a collegue of mine has made an article (well, actually
more of a reference/pointer/short description) to freenet, and refered to
the sourceforge page.
Maybe that seems like an obvious mistake, but in any case: why doesn't
anyone who can, update the f- page, there? It's still says
