[freenet-support] too much memory used

2004-01-31 Thread Michael
I keep hearing this too much memory, and let me tell you, folks.  I
run an old-timey AMD 400 and 192 megs of ram.  I leave my machine
running for days with freenet java daemons running constantly and this
is my memory usage:
 total   used   free sharedbuffers
cached
Mem:191064 187444   3620  0  11772 
27172
-/+ buffers/cache: 148500  42564
Swap:   385520 198376 187144
Total used, including swap: 187+198=385+ megs... not too bad, I'd say. 
If I upgraded to 512megs I'd have room to spare.  What I have noticed is
that all yous who have mem problems are running some version of Winderz.
No more comments, 'cept, SuSE Linux is available for free download at
www.suse.com.


On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 04:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Send Support mailing list submissions to
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ject.org
 
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 You can reach the person managing the list at
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of Support digest...
 
 
 Today's Topics:
 
1. Re: Request for help (Ian Clarke)
2. Re: Way to much RAM! Build 5064 (David Masover)
3. Re: Request for help (Toad)
4. potential-bug - report (Tobias Bradtke)
5. Serious JVM bug. (Nick Austin)
6. Re: [freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
   (Sheldon Young)
7. Re: Way to much RAM! Build 5064 (Phillip Hutchings)
8. Re: Request for help (Ian Clarke)
9. Re: Request for help (Toad)
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 1
 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:27:55 +
 From: Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
 
 Toad wrote:
  2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
  This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
  CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
  or similar.
 
 Um, yes - we do, dodo.
 
 Ian.
 
 --
 
 Message: 2
 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:32:11 -0600
 From: David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Way to much RAM! Build 5064
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 
 | Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko or
 
 No, it wouldn't.  Gecko is for rendering (and I'd guess that WebKit is
 also).  It takes html and renders it.  Freenet currently uses html, and
 will probably continue to use it (at least for browsing).
 
 It doesn't use http, of course, but adding a freenet://  URL style
 wouldn't change things too much, since you need the key first anyway --
 it's going to be a long address no matter what.  All that would do is
 allow for URLs to be to somewhere other than localhost, which can
 already be done (not sure if it has) by the server itself.  This is
 better, because it doesn't require modifying a browser, and so far
 there's only one server.
 
 And if you wanted to do such a thing, or the privacy features
 auto-set, you would do it as a browser extension -- notice when it's a
 freenet url, and don't do things like caching it.  For this, you'd
 probably just specify a particular host:port that is a freenet url.
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
 iQIVAwUBQBrpewisZLIF6uqOAQJsuBAAiKP95NiE0ByRAwRamefiEB+jNM5d7wPd
 +QTy7x/s+SrhuarMtvnaGjZIjBzHOjv13lMm/3lA6cDlNOQjCLfapktmKN9mxn9l
 qQHE2ELBi8FQaYeuEkESH4M0TFQYpiUv9Zcxa5+IPzSbWOYfrRKoqUUlLHahsEAl
 mIFizhGfjBKRMKmia0YlcMYlUR6psuhBMVgU+A0N7oCHC8CTKeXM4HvMgUp7DOjK
 M1IS5YW1l7mvE0OXj2Y3+7lW6gFPT1L15qdV46OK1lc9JcUii9MD2T3sKf2Tiq0q
 QLNCGgv1voLkz5LLrOzJnZRAVhryE/nmfKVLlsLD1YFv2d8p5/xGhho66FvwDdRb
 uAwmrjK7sLy8HxSJGcsZO5MEhb+4d4nBUzycT2Xc4lnpEjRaoq0yBnDVPnvIfS3A
 a0GtsAuP69BTJKfM7mo+qZlyYjyBvfsztKXFwxx95F3Hq39+AISuEbdrie4TA7Cy
 8+8MvMfpAoHwC0gUWkuDQLDaKGo8D8HUve2oTZLylhShNvM6wumYUYVx+fL0gViq
 SubnJLi7JLA3ffQ0m24FFjZQJeWAUaddqKnQeTBpNEMDrkigmzPsAens7WnIISvJ
 sA0MF/8TX7pYX+QMfP1AS93+LgbKJUOFCux+aby7CvtIMG3FTxafvZpGWjyqkApW
 21bVOtLCkNA=
 =f50Y
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 --
 
 Message: 3
 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:52:09 +
 From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
  Toad wrote:
  2. 

Re: [freenet-support] too much memory used

2004-01-31 Thread Nikita Proskourine
I run freenet on Windows from command line and JRE caps memory usage at 
64MB. And FreeNet still works great. When I look at memory used in the 
Environment on the gateway, it doesn't even use all of 64MB. I have 
256MB total.

Nikita.

Michael wrote:

I keep hearing this too much memory, and let me tell you, folks.  I
run an old-timey AMD 400 and 192 megs of ram.  I leave my machine
running for days with freenet java daemons running constantly and this
is my memory usage:
total   used   free sharedbuffers
cached
Mem:191064 187444   3620  0  11772 
27172
-/+ buffers/cache: 148500  42564
Swap:   385520 198376 187144
Total used, including swap: 187+198=385+ megs... not too bad, I'd say. 
If I upgraded to 512megs I'd have room to spare.  What I have noticed is
that all yous who have mem problems are running some version of Winderz.
No more comments, 'cept, SuSE Linux is available for free download at
www.suse.com.

On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 04:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

Send Support mailing list submissions to
	[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   

 

ject.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Support digest...
Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Request for help (Ian Clarke)
  2. Re: Way to much RAM! Build 5064 (David Masover)
  3. Re: Request for help (Toad)
  4. potential-bug - report (Tobias Bradtke)
  5. Serious JVM bug. (Nick Austin)
  6. Re: [freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
 (Sheldon Young)
  7. Re: Way to much RAM! Build 5064 (Phillip Hutchings)
  8. Re: Request for help (Ian Clarke)
  9. Re: Request for help (Toad)
--

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:27:55 +
From: Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Toad wrote:
   

2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
or similar.
 

Um, yes - we do, dodo.

Ian.

--

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:32:11 -0600
From: David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Way to much RAM! Build 5064
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko or

No, it wouldn't.  Gecko is for rendering (and I'd guess that WebKit is
also).  It takes html and renders it.  Freenet currently uses html, and
will probably continue to use it (at least for browsing).
It doesn't use http, of course, but adding a freenet://  URL style
wouldn't change things too much, since you need the key first anyway --
it's going to be a long address no matter what.  All that would do is
allow for URLs to be to somewhere other than localhost, which can
already be done (not sure if it has) by the server itself.  This is
better, because it doesn't require modifying a browser, and so far
there's only one server.
And if you wanted to do such a thing, or the privacy features
auto-set, you would do it as a browser extension -- notice when it's a
freenet url, and don't do things like caching it.  For this, you'd
probably just specify a particular host:port that is a freenet url.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=f50Y
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:52:09 +
From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL 

Re: [freenet-support] too much memory used

2004-01-31 Thread Toad
Bandwidth?

On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:52:36PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote:
 No.
 
 Nikita.
 
 Toad wrote:
 
 On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:49:14PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote:
  
 
 I run freenet on Windows from command line and JRE caps memory usage at 
 64MB. And FreeNet still works great. When I look at memory used in the 
 Environment on the gateway, it doesn't even use all of 64MB. I have 
 256MB total.

 
 
 Transient node?
  
 
 
 
 ___
 Support mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at 
 http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 ___
 Support mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at 
 http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] too much memory used

2004-01-31 Thread Nikita Proskourine
inputBandwidthLimit=0
outputBandwidthLimit=4
Could've set it much higher, but didn't want to.

Nikita.

Toad wrote:

Bandwidth?

On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:52:36PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote:
 

No.

Nikita.

Toad wrote:

   

On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:49:14PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote:

 

I run freenet on Windows from command line and JRE caps memory usage at 
64MB. And FreeNet still works great. When I look at memory used in the 
Environment on the gateway, it doesn't even use all of 64MB. I have 
256MB total.
 

   

Transient node?



___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at 
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at 
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   

 



___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]