Hi, I have some questions concerning Load Balancer and Failover, hope
that someone can help.
1. I have configured the load balancer for 2 physical interfaces (WAN
OPT1). I monitor the states table and realized that the icmp packets for
monitoring purpose were fired only from the OPT1
Regarding 1: we'll check this
Regarding 2: Yes, you are right. You typicall want to even create 3 pools for
this: one loadbalanced (WAN+OPT1), one failover WAN to OPT1 and one failover
OPT1 to WAN. Then just create firewallrules to make use of either of the pools.
This way you can have
Hi Holger,
1. I take back my words. WAN interface fires icmp poll too, but strange
that the icmp poll fired by OPT1 is found in the states table but not
for the one fired by the WAN interface. I found this on a reject log
in firewall log. I configured the firewall rule for WAN interface to
accept
1. What Version of pfSense are you running? If it's not a recent snapshot
please upgrade.
2. Yes, that is correct.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kelvin Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. März 2007 12:36
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: RE: [pfSense Support]
Hi Holger, we built it on 31st Jan 2007. Has there been significant
change since then?
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:42 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer
1. What Version of pfSense
new snapshots come out at least once a week and sometimes sooner.
each one has bug fixes and enhancements in it.
I usually upgrade everytime a new snapshot comes out.
-Sean
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: support@pfsense.com Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007
22:19:23 +0800 Subject: RE: [pfSense Support]
For sure. I remember that there has been a rule issue with pings that also
resulted in wan quality rrd graph showing constant packetloss which was fixed
and your problem seems to be similiar.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kelvin Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet:
Luca Lucchesi wrote:
I setted up the PPTP server on a pfSense system.
The clients can connect to it from Windows XP with a natted ADSL
Internet connection, but if I try with a dialup connection I get a 619
error.
619 is typically caused by blocking or NAT breakage of GRE. If you try a
There are instructions on how to remount the flash drive into RW mode in
the FAQ.
http://faq.pfsense.org/index.php?action=artikelcat=11id=171artlang=en
There's the rope, I hope it is enough. pfflowd shouldn't be writing
when in use, so this should be safe to use. Remount to RW mode, install
Hi,
This worked fine when I was using a switch with no VLAN configuration ,
but as soon as we defined VLANs on the switch, it seems that the PFSense
machine has lost contact with all other machines, both virtual and
physical. Are the VLANs defined at the switch level transparent to the
If you try a different dial up provider does it work?
If I try a different dialup provider it doesn't work...
If you try a different PPTP connection on the same dial up provider does it
work?
No, it doesn't work...
My first guess is the dial up ISP is doing something to cause it to not
Would that mean one could configure dialup failover?
If so that would be really cool.
Kind regards
David
- Original Message -
From: Luca Lucchesi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 9:08 AM
Subject: [pfSense Support] Can't connect to PPTP with
Looks like a client issue then. Do you run any so called mtu optimizers or
webaccelerators on the client? Some hardcode a higher mtu if you tell them to
optimize for dsl-lines for example.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Luca Lucchesi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet:
No, this is something completely different. We don't support any kind of dialup
connections. Only ethernet type interfaces are supported.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tortise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. März 2007 20:43
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff:
Ok, Thanks Holger
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 10:44 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer
For sure. I remember that there has been a rule issue with pings that
also resulted in wan
Thanks Josh, doesnt seem to be enough though.
It seems to remount itself RO as soon as i try to write to it.
# mount -o rw -u /
# mount
/dev/ufs/pfSense on / (ufs, local)
devfs on /dev (devfs, local)
/dev/md0 on /tmp (ufs, local)
/dev/md1 on /var (ufs, local)
/dev/ufs/pfSenseCfg on /cf (ufs,
Hi All
I have pfsense 1.0.1 running on wrap. I have troubles passing Linux-NFS
from/to LAN/WLAN. Somehow Linux sets Don't Fragment and additional
Fragments. pfsense is dropping such packets...
I have found in advance settings a checkbox for a workaround that pfsense is
clearing the DF-flag,
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Daniel Harzenmoser wrote:
Hi All
I have pfsense 1.0.1 running on wrap. I have troubles passing Linux-NFS
from/to LAN/WLAN. Somehow Linux sets Don't Fragment and additional
Fragments. pfsense is dropping such packets...
I have found in advance settings a checkbox for a
18 matches
Mail list logo
